Why space and time have a cryptic connection
About | Information | History | Online | Facts | Discovery
Space and time seem like the simplest, most fundamental, concepts there are. And yet...we really don’t know why they behave the way they do.
Comments
-
It's just Two Wave's.. . .!!
-
You deserve more views
-
I DO NOT TALK OF THE BEGINNING OR THE END
https://plus.google.com/113206833774432390918/posts/bUp8yFZGk59 -
Great vid. You sound like chef John.
-
Man I love Ted-Ed! Wait, you mean this is, oh.
-
This is a GREAT presentation because it gets right down to the nitty gritty of what physicists do not know about space and time. Physicists know that spacetime exists yet have no clue as to how it exists or how it came to exist. This video states that reconciling space and time can be done by not considering them as fundamental features of the universe, that they would have to be considered as coming from something else. The trouble is that physicists have no idea what that deeper fundamental "something" is. This video then gets to the essence of the problem of truly understanding the universe (the Theory of Everything) which is the mystery of space and time that must be confronted.
Notice that the narrator states that space and time come from something else and are not fundamental features of the universe. The key to understanding space and time as part of our universe AND yet not seeming to be fundamental features of our universe is explained by Gordon Energy states. Spacetime is composed of massless entities (entities, not particles because particles exist "in" spacetime whereas these entities exist "as" spacetime. These entities are called Gordon Omnipresent Dots or GOD entities. They organize into a stable lattice alignment and are associated with energy. The energy associated with spacetime is referred to as E0 energy as it is proportional to c^0 (it is this energy that comprises most of the energy in our universe) . Before the big bang, the GOD entities were initially aligned in others region of energy on the same planar alignment. During the Big Bang, the GOD entities found a true "hidden dimension" (their axial alignment) and this led to a vacuum decay phenomenon as the GOD Entities rearranged from a planar alignment to a cubic alignment. Some of the GOD Entities were accelerated to a great enough velocity so that they could not settle into a position within the new cubic alignment. Once the cubic alignment of GOD entities was complete, these GOD entities moving at "c" would be destined to move at "c" forever and their associated energy that is now proportional to c^1 will remain "locked" out of the E0 energy of spacetime forever. This "locking out" of energy means that these energies will coexist in the same space. It is the coexisting of these energies that provides a particle's mechanism to create its energy fields. It also provides the basis of the law fr the conservation of energy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0sYgju-M4EY
The answers that physicists seek are in the book "The GOD Entity: Gordon's Theory of Everything" (www.thegodentity.com) where it explains everything about the spacetime energy medium. (yes spacetime is a medium but try to tell that to a physicist) This book was not written by a physicist (I am an engineer - Sorry Sheldon Cooper and the rest of you physicists , Howard Wallowitz and us engineers did what you could not -- LOL!) The Book did not come from within the hallowed halls of academia nor from any of the prestigious institutes of higher learning and therefore I suspect it will be ignored. It will also be ignored because I used the acronym GOD for the entity that builds spacetime, this acronym is like kryptonite to physicists.... LOL! In any case, the answer is the answer and it does not change nor will it go away. I will patiently await my "Max Planck" to bring this book and Gordon's Theory of Everything to light. -
We were with you up until quantum mechanics.
-
This one wasn't totally terrible, you're making progress ;)
-
First of all why we have to work according to the Einstein Formula or any formula such as speed = distance/time. Why you think this formula is correct? Time itself is motion, but repetitive motion. Only for convenience we use the formula. Time is not same every where, if you increase the motion, number of cycles of motion will increase. So time will increase. And you use this motion to measure another motion that is not repetitive.
Here is a question to understand it better.
Take a cutter whose cutting motion is constant. Now change the motion of the wood with which it is inserted. If we insert wood faster, it will cut the wood into larger pieces i.e more amount of wood passes the cutter, similarly if we insert the wood slower, we get smaller pieces i.e. less amount of wood passes the cutter.
Similarly you can imagine motion of cutter changing. Faster cutter will cut wood into smaller pieces and slower cutter will cut wood into larger pieces.
Does it mean motion detects motion, we really don't require the TIME.
From this motion or change, we can derive any thing that we see, hear, feel etc.
To understand where this equations are being derived:
http://bioinsilico.blogspot.in/2015/10/is-our-universe-mathematical-or-its.html
Fundamental flaw is this formula speed = distance/time. -
Wait but if the photons are traveling at a certain speed, be that the speed of light, maybe for them they've reached from point A to B in no time what so ever but to me the observer they've reached point B after some time, so how is it possible for them to get there in no time?
2m 24sLenght
309Rating