What is the Speed of Gravity? | Space News
About | Information | History | Online | Facts | Discovery
Quantum experiments have long demonstrated that subatomic particles somehow “know” about each other instantly, and at great distances. Institutional science utilizes terms such as quantum entanglement and spooky action to describe the phenomena. But the Electric Universe theory offers a very different perspective. The speed of light limit to communication imposed by the theory of relativity is not a universal speed limit. In this Space News episode, Nicholas Sykes elaborates the fundamental differences in this regard between those of the Electric Universe and standard cosmology. Previous Nick Sykes Space News, "Are the Dominoes Falling for Standard Cosmology?": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZEYdsZFNOrE Wal Thornhill EU 2015 Presentation: The Long Path to Understanding Gravity: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YkWiBxWieQU If you see a CC with this video, it means that subtitles are available. To find out which ones, click on the Gear Icon in the lower right area of the video box and click on “subtitles” in the drop down box. Then click on the subtitle that you would like. SUPPORT US ON PATREON AND WATCH OUR INFLUENCE GROW: “Changing the world through understanding of the Electric Universe." https://www.patreon.com/tboltsproject Subscribe to Thunderbolts Update newsletter: http://eepurl.com/ETy41 The Thunderbolts Project Home: http://www.thunderbolts.info Essential Guide to the Electric Universe: http://www.thunderbolts.info/wp/eg-contents/ Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/thunderboltsproject Twitter: @tboltsproject Electric Universe by Wal Thornhill: http://www.holoscience.com/wp/ Electric Universe T-shirts and Gifts: http://stickmanonstone.com/ The ideas expressed in videos presented on The Thunderbolts Project YouTube Channel do not necessarily express the views of T-Bolts Group Inc or The Thunderbolts Project(TM).
Comments
-
the speed depends on the planet.
-
I suggest this not as a solution, I'm no scientist, but as a thought experiment.
There is only Now. The past does not exist; there is no reflective residue that we can return to, only the series of antecedent Nows in our records.
And no future exists either, but by understanding the series of Nows, we can predict the Nows which will follow with some accuracy. The time-delays are fictitious, There is an interaction NOW, regardless of our ideas about the time needed to travel the distance,
Now is constant and the link is either already established, or will be established in some future now, or dis-established. Time is largely a construct of planets revolving around suns, but at any given moment, the relationships of Now prevail. Time is not real even if experienced. -
holy shit. a second falling domino to trigger a collapse of a credible theory of relativity.
-
The graphic @4:43 just doesn't make sense. The centripetal gravitational vector displayed doesn't even point toward the source of gravity (the sun), therefore it could never be experienced at that particular orbital angle.
-
but maybe we are recieving the gravitation of 8 minutes ago. If sun dissappears one day maybe after 8 minutes we will go out of orbit.
-
I simply cannot take anything a preacher says seriously.
-
good job
-
Thank you so very much. 😊😊👍👍
-
how fast are the gravity waves measured/claimed by LIGO ?
-
This one really hit home for me. I have been thinking that
gravity holds lots more secrets than we yet understand. (Also magnetism).
I also gave lots of thought as to what could be faster than light, and
all I could come up with is thought and perhaps magnetics; though I
cannot prove thought. Thought can reach Pluto in a split second, but
there is no measurement possible, so distance traveled is probably more
imagined than real. If a light went off on Pluto when I thought about
it, that would be real measurement. But in the case of gravity or
magnetism, we do have real "communication" between two entities showing
that something is going back and forth.
Gosh, I wish I had a mentor in this realm. This has been stewing in me
since I was young. -
Gravity wave in this theoryis imposible even a mesurement is wrong in speed of light
-
this is absurd.
-
Awesome points... although I would like to see the Gelgameks and the Queen Spider weigh in on this.
-
Excellent points! Thank you! Remember Susan, "The only thing we have to fear is fear itself." FDR fireside chat
-
3 times the speed of darkness.
-
In his video presentation "The Long Path to Understanding Gravity" Wal Thornhill points out that theoretical sciences assume that the role of gravity is settled" when it is not settled. There are many who disagree with EU and Thunderbolts Project that seem to know a lot of things that just aren't so but they state it as fact. Take, for example, the speed of light. They will tell you light travels at 186,000 miles per second, but they'd be wrong as pointed out in the above video 0:29. In their mind, however, it is a settled fact. Hence, discussing it with them is futile as they seem to know a lot of things that just aren't so.
-
the title is a rhetorical question as i could not answer before you give the answer. lol... i did have a clue prior to this video, from watching Wallace Thornhill.
gravity = E.M.? -
A further thought: Gravity and Dark Energy don't actually have to travel very fast as matter doesn't travel very fast - relative to the speed of light - as they are fundamentally part of the matter that is moving about in a relatively leisurely fashion.
-
While I am a big fan of EU, this description of super-hyper-speed gravity transit seems invalid.
Gravity, iff electrically set up over thousands of years for any given part of the Electric Universe might just be THERE i.e. not going anywhere, or 'fit in like a block in a wall', or solid as an annex of an already existing building.
Speed of gravity, should be deemed an intellectual non-sequitur as 'gravity' never goes anywhere i.e. it's always where it was (painstakingly) laid down. -
"The Earth would be pulled to where the Sun appears in the sky and not the Sun's real position in space." What? This doesn't make sense to me. The Sun is not moving it's position in space. Let's say gravity was a slow 186,000 miles per second. It does not send out a point of gravity to the Earth like a string. The Sun is spherical if you hadn't noticed. Gravity's influence or pull is also spherical. The Earth cannot lag behind a spherical pull. The pull of gravity from the Sun is constant; there is no point in our orbit in which the pull of the Sun starts or stops. You might as well argue that the light from the sun is too slow and the Earth might outrun it. Even IF the speed of gravity was that of light, the Earth is locked into its pull and that spherical pull cannot lag behind the Earth or the Sun.
Or am I confused...
8m 59sLenght
575Rating