Wal Thornhill: The Star ‘Proto-Saturn’ | EU Workshop

About | Information | History | Online | Facts | Discovery

1. On reviewing this talk I find the sound could be turned up a bit. The content of this material is truly important and needs to be heard clearly.
2. To Wal Thornhill I would expect people to not use metal much at all. Not with the environment charged to what I would expect much higher levels than we experience now. a small metal object would likely be a lightening rod.
3. Man, i would give practically ANYTHING to have this dude come to my house and sit there all day just talking about and explaining the universe. I feel like such an unintelligent child after watching these videos, lol, knowing practically everything I was told about the universe and "black holes" and stars and such were lies. If I had the money to pay him for a lecture, I would. Just out of curiosity, how much would that cost???
4. What does everyone think of Ken Wheeler's "Magnetism Secrets" in regard to Walt Thornhill's "Electric  Universe"?
5. It's amazing how anyone can come up with such an amount of retarded bullshit.
6. If we were in a brown dwarf and there were no seasons, wouldn't plant fossils support this? I've never seen fossilized trees with no tree rings.
7. This guys monotone speaking voice is so mind numbing I can't take it. I think my text to speech module on my commodore 64 had more inflection. Seriously, for a public speaker, this guys speaking voice is a total disaster. Is he on valium or something? I am always interested to hear what he has to say, but I can never stand the monotone droning sound of his voice for more than a minute.
8. are you saying that nitrogen exposed to a hot iron surface converts the nitrogen into carbonmonoxide? so, protons, neutrons and electrons rearrange completely due to the presence of hot iron?? one element turns into 2 other elements, right? in which universe this should be true again?
9. I also am glad I have lived long enough to watch this and be satisfied with this theory over all others.
10. this could also explain how we moved those megalithic stone blocks back in the day, gravity?? less gravity less weight, they could just simply be able to pick them up, no one have ever been able to explain this.
11. Wal, based on Jupiter(Saturn)'s current orbit, can we guess-timate the charge potential that was unleashed to take it from its inception location in Sol-ar System (dropping off the inner planets in its wake) to its current location?
    
    Thanks.
12. can,t here a dam thing  keep your audio levels high we can allways turn it down.. but not up..think man think.
13. at 24:00, Steamers coming of Venus and the effect of our sun on those streamers caused it to turn backwards, NO. He is saying that the overwhelming effect of the electrical field, and that is a field of a sun and its planets Spiraling through space and 60 thousands of miles an hour. VENUS should be turning the same as the rest of the planets. That is the big crack in his theory. ALSO, Saturn's rings could have came from the planet that was blown up between Mars and Jupiter. IF Venus was part of the Nibiru system and the Nibiru lost Venus to our sun, then it would be easy to see how Venus turns backwards.
    He says Venus has mountans that have St Elmos Fire but does NOT explain why. I will tell you why, it is because Venus turns backwards and causes electrical stress and causes this fire/plasma. My theory is just as good as his, using his most of his own information.
    Fist up, Fight for Truth.
14. Ein Plasmaverse ist logisch.
    Warum deppatieren die Astronomen, welche der Standardtheorie anhängen nicht mit den Plasmakosmologen?
15. Wait so how did Jupiter get between Saturn and Ourselves? Why isnt it our proton Sun instead? we do have a different tilt to it but i dont get why the sun was able to rip Mars Earth and Venus away from Saturn either. Titan and Ganamied (however that is spelt) have stayed with their respective planets. Both are bigger than Mercury
16. I thought stars twinkled because of our atmosphere, and that our atmosphere is the reason we can even see the light from stars because of refraction. No matter, no refraction, right? So now you're telling me that if leave the atmosphere and observe these objects with NO LENS I will see electric light?
17. official subs please
18. +ThunderboltsProject
    Wow. The Saint Elmo's fire comment resonated. The Pyramids of Earth doing axactly as they are named. (And possibly Mars pre our present Sun's interaction)
    The ability to send a balloon aloft and generate electricity in our current atmosphere amazes me.
     I have a question. Would a lesser gravity environment make this method of capturing electricity more or less effective? And if so how?
     I'm still a newbie so if this is a dumb question ....
19. Proto Saturn is very interesting theory. But Velikovsky theory says that it was Jupiter that ejected Venus, not Saturn. Are you suggesting that Velikovsky misinterpreted ancient texts? In your opinion, what was the role of Jupiter in the early Solar system?
20. This is not meant in a negative way, but please permit me some critique(meant as points for improvement) to the approach you took : you could probably take more time to explain the assertions you make even if that means you cover far less points. As things are, the presentation ends up as a very long list of assertions, many with little to no stated support- this leaves the listener feeling that the balance is unsupported. if the electric universe theory is tp have real validity, then we must strive to explain each claim made. There is ZERO value for an assertion left without logical or evidentiary support. However if only a fraction of the points you made here, would be detailed out with full explanations, they would be much harder to reject.
    i would love if you did a longer version, in which, when you say "that explains...." you take the time to specify how. for example, you said the red dwarf's lack of regulation explains salty oceans. you should explain how regulation happens, how red dwarfs are deprived of it, how charges cause the ejecta and how that ties in to sodium chloride. Again, i am a fan, and i too would love to see this theory gain support.