Vedic Cosmology Part 1 of 6

About | Information | History | Online | Facts | Discovery

1. reality and science are evolving and what is complete nonsense to you today may be reality tomorrow. All scientific theories are constantly changed to accommodate new findings. Scientific spirit is not comprising of "I know all attitude , this is wrong that is wrong. Our senses and capabilities are limited and imperfect so let us tread cautiously in terming this is correct that is wrong. 
2. vedic mathematices,philosophy,ayurveda,astronomy are impressive
3. lol. typical pseudointellectual bullshit. Are you aware that M-theory is just an hypothesis? I hope you know what an hypothesis is. And hilariously you are using an unproven theory to explain and defend some stupidity. Please read and learn about vedic cosmology. Look at the order of planets as per vedic cosmology. Then talk about those parallel universes. Where are all those lokas as per vedic cosmology?
4. I completely disagree with you simply because with your high intellect you seem to be completely ignorant about the M theory which explains the analogy of the lokas as parallel universes in a Multiverse theory. I believe one should wait for the presence science to mature over time with results from LIZA observatory and Kepler(currently down due to system failure) to unravel these theories.
5. the way the cosmos are interpreted the creation and destruction cycle are all scientifically proven, we are formed by protons and electrons moving in different patterns forming atoms that bond to create elements and these elements when exposed to different frequencies combine to create what we know as life but really its the vibration (AUM) which formed us. 
6. No.. but you see.. I the modern world if a person can get such knowledge in a Gurukul system of education. It will be beneficial.. 
7. Vedic knowledge is available everywhere! "Should be given...?" Are people sheep?
8. that is what science estimates its not proven read this wwwhitxp com /articles/veda/veda-age-universe-bigbang/ and you may not believe in god but the some of the greatest civilisations which helped develop mathematics,science, archetiture all believed in god or gods and also sri bhagatam says The present Manu has already lived for 4,320,000 years multiplied by 28 which is approx 12 billlion which science says 13 billion close wouldnt you say
9. You don't what you are actually talking about. I did not deny that hinduism says so. But what I said was that its wrong. You must be poor in maths and astronomy. Take your own time to understand my comment. Please write clearly. FYI age of EARTH is 4.54 billion years and the age of the UNIVERSE is 13.7 billion years, which is different from the age of EARTH. What about all those lokas and oceans mentioned? Where are they?
10. you know nothing Hindu cosmology, a universe endures for about 4,320,000,000 years this is only one day of brahma and according to hinduism in about 400,000 years 500,000 years left then it will start over and the cycle will continue total for 40 billion and then brahma will be created again and hinduism also talks about multi universes and also says there are more animal species than humans which science has confirmed
11. first we dont do idol worship we dont believe the idol is god but we believe its part of god we believe god is present everywhere in humans,the universe, fire etc the people and im against caste system because the way they show it down grades hinduism the castes were status of life anybody could achieve with hardwork its like struggling and working hard to become doctor but some illterate people made this a status you get when your born which isnt true it doesnt say this in the scriptures
12. im theistic hindu but i agree astrologers are fake they are just tricking hindus
13. the concepts like eclipse can only be understood by going deep into hinduism there are many scientific facts in hinduism
14. Respecting is different and accepting it as science is different. Right? We respect our parents. But do you believe them if you know that they are lying? When astrologers say that rahu and ketu affect you in so and so ways, for me its complete nonsense. How come invisible(in fact non-existing hence no material) affect in anyway and more than the rest of the asteroid belt present in our solar system and more than any other heavy object near us on earth ?
15. 'Some of the knowledge in the Vedas is true, but the rest of it I am sure it is not true.' Thats exactly what I say. That some is very very few. And most of the knowledge after vedic periods is also attributed as vedic knowledge. Like works of Aryabhatta, Madhava, Bhaskara I & II etc.
16. ooh really. The fact is your brain is damaged or you are in illusion. You call evolution a lie. I think that argument with you would be nothing but futile. 
17. close guess? NO. I already gave the numbers. its 34,000 times higher. Where is 4.54 billion years and where is 156 trillion years. I don't call 156,000 is approximately equal to 4.54. If it is +/- 10 or even +/- 100 I would accept it as close guess. My speculation is that there is nothing scientific thought in it but its purely based on the scales used by them. And age of earth is different from the age of universe.
18. Let me clearly put it to you. I appreciate vedas for the knowledge they have, because they were developed in times when Indian culture was advanced than others. I respect their thoughts even those times. I respect ayurveda for medicine and yoga to enhance body and mind control. Just because I say that I respect vedas does not mean that I should take everything in vedas for granted, even when I know that they are wrong. Right? I am talking vedic cosmology here.
19. The age of earth in vedas is totally wrong. Though it is in higher numbers, the number is way too high. Age of earth as per modern science is only 4.54 billion years but as per vedas it is 156 trillion years, which is 34,000 times higher. And earth formed after about 9 billion years after the universe was created. There is no mention of this in vedas.
20. The heliocentric model is not there in vedas. The model of universe in vedas is a fantasy. Heliocentric model was proposed by Aryabhatta who lived much later than vedic times. Aryabhatta did great works in maths and astronomy but its not vedas. For his work he was even exiled from his CASTE/community. only speed of light mentioned in vedas is true. But even there was no mention of HOW it was calculated.