This IS a Dielectric -Magnetic - Electric Universe

About | Information | History | Online | Facts | Discovery

1. As I am no fan of the time Hawking has wasted for me- I DO like his one offering - 'If the Universe were infinite- then any point is as valid as any other to being the center'
   
   It's a neat meditation
   
   I see Hawking is starting to bring out the eraser for his black hole theory as of late.
   
   In the end he'll say- bleh- it was wrong.
   
   Ok to be fair he's currently reconsidering the entire 'event horizon' theory - trying to solve that dilemma of can information ever be lost in the Universe.
   
   He is once again- trapped into causal thinking
   
   He CLEARLY did not read Wolfgang Pauli's unique paper on acausality- 1953 if I recall- and Carl Jung got in on that one.
   
   I was reading Jung said he and Einstein would spend a lot of time- and the 'poor man would ramble on about higher mathematics- and he didn't know I didn't understand a thing he talked about'
   
   Jung said THEN one day Einstein asked Jung about the psyche- after Jung was done - Einstein said something of the order 'It is too bad that one practically has to specialize in certain domains of knowledge such that they become unable to share their field with anyone else- as it requires specialization'
   
   Now that IS a unique dilemma
   
   But Hawking's If the Universe is infinite- then anywhere is it's center - heh- I really like that one.
   
   I DO LIKE Hawking- I just don't buy into his peddling of black hole theory.
2. I love the hosts comment about people clinging on to their models where gravity is king - hahaha...
   
   So true
   
   I too am no fan of red shift. People often compare it to the Doppler effect in physics, but acoustics of physics doesn't map to electromagnetic phenomena - by analogy sure but not in reality. The entire 'Universe is expanding' model hinges on red shift, I once again think red shift is due to a combination of gravity and electromagnetic influences on light. This also explains why we can have varying red shifts in objects near each other, plus I am no fan the Universe exploded from a big bang - more backwards retracing using red shift theory.
   
   Seems to me - if the Universe came out of nothing- TRULY nothing? I'd argue REAL nothingness is ALWAYS nothingness- and it would still BE nothing if it ever WAS nothing at all - ever... Clearly it couldn't have come out of nothing, or it would still BE nothing if it truly did.
   
   Either way- while every 5 year old objects to big bang as well- demonstrating newly learned command of intellect - causality ? every 5 year old gets to 'and what came before that' - until the parents ALWAYS just fold - the LEAST they could do is sell the child 'It's turtles all the way down' (Originally Elephants in ancient India- as to the expression and origin).
   
   It's far more rewarding to me when looking at the night sky to think- it goes on forever (totally jaw dropping in awe) vs... it all came from nothing (an intellectual frustration).
   
   The ENTIRE expanding Universe model HINGES on red shift- and red shift is wrong.
   
   So bye bye big bang- bye bye black holes - NEVER buy into abstract theories in physics 'just because' think about them - challenge them - TRUST your intuition - you NEED intuition in the dark abyss of the undiscovered universe - it is your guide. Intellect merely becomes a tool to validate intuition in the end for me.
   
   Just watch the floating frog and sort it all out from there- that's what I did.
   
   Replace frog with center of galaxy, you'll get an idea of what I'm suggesting goes on at the center of the galaxy, an INTENSE electromagnetic field - so strong it negates any effect of gravity.
   
   This ALSO explains HOW you can have stars flying around SO fast at the center of the galaxy and yet ? gee- if was due to an intense gravitational field ?they'd be torn apart- not so- they fly around SO fast because they - like the frog - are not subject TO gravity due to the - just like the giant electromagnet surrounding the frog at what was it ? 20 gigawatts ? they - like the frog are surrounded by an INTENSE electromagnetic field.
   
   Guess where that field comes from ?
   
   ALL THE STARS NEAR the center of the galaxy- they act quite similar to the giant electromagnet surrounding the frog.
   
   You can actually GO to this facility in Europe and play with this
   
   http://www.ru.nl/hfml/research/levitation/diamagnetic/
   
   With even MORE energy- yes- you can watch a human being spin freely- on earth - with ZERO effect of gravity.
   
   I LOATHE 99.9% of physicists who tell me this is 'just some fluke'
   
   I argue the hair brained addiction to classical physics where gravity rules is more of the fluke.
   
   The missing piece is G/sqr(e)=c^2/m
   
   I woke up one morning and one hour later settled on that - it solves for G, and it's relationship to energy and mass.
   
   Check the math - it works. It's how G fits in related to electromagnetic.
   
   It's the grand booby door prize of theoretical physics! heh
3. Ever since I saw that silly frog freely floating in an electromagnetic field - completely overriding gravity, I became interested in diamagnetism and electromagnetism. I have since thrown out the model that the center of the galaxy as a 'black hole' such that it has intense gravity, I think it's quite the opposite - I think the center of the galaxy is like that frog - in an intense electromagnetic field and the reason you see stars moving SO fast and free around the center of the galaxy is just as the frog- diamagnetism.
   
   I am so happy to see you too have this hunch - I have found very little on the subject, actually, nothing until now.
   
   It makes so much more sense to me too- if a Sun basically engages in fusion due to pressure of gravity - up to what ? iron or nickel ? clearly the intense force of this alleged black hole with intense gravity? I argue a black hole would continue fusion upwards past nickel, but the key is? A black hole is merely a matter eating and CONVERTING machine, so there IS no mass left, alas, no intense gravity- just an intense electromagnetic field - SO intense - thus making anything in it's range demonstrate diamagnetism.
   
   There is a unique relationship between electromagnetic and gravity- I see them as two facets of the same thing.
   
   Clearly - bottom line- that frog floats (type in floating frog into youtube) due to diamagnetism and electromagnetism, so - as I ALWAYS hear physicists say 'oh Tim, that's just some fluke called diamagnetism' I say- nope - end of day- diamagnetism and electromagnetism override or 'beat' gravity in my book.
   
   Indeed - I contend that just as gravity can attract mass, electromagnetic fields are the opposite- the create near ZERO pull, so what do you get VERY near the sun in my arm chair theory ? you get some gravitational pull BUT - you have that negated due to the electromagnetic field the sun produces as well.
   
   In my intuition - the center of each galaxy isn't so much a gravitational pull, I believe it's MOSTLY electromagnetic and diamagnetic - virtually NO pull.
   
   I never was a fan of black holes, think about it- you can't compress mass without forcing conversion to energy, you just can't - even the atoms break down. Whoever sold this model leaves me wondering how so many people ever bought it - black holes being gravity giants- they can't be- that very conversion of mass to energy produces intense electromagnetic fields which in turn, back to the free floating frog- cancel out gravity.
   
   Thanks so much for making this video
   
   I haven't even watched more than a minute yet but I can tell right off you are onto the same hunch I am onto.
4. Your video states that the neutron star, black hole and pulsar/quasar models are fabrications due to scientists ignoring electrical forces. You should provide the electrical explanation for each, as a counterpoint. Without that, you are simply making an assertion without the support of theoretical or experimental evidence. This is what i find to be the common denominator in most so called fringe science, namely, the lack of structured counter-explanations. Most videos spend a great deal of the narrative on accusatory claims, generalized platitudes or downright childish but most lack the very simple statement: "here is how this really works" . The use of scientific terminology and the inclusion of establishment scientist names or theories stands in balance with the clarity or completeness of the alternative explanation. Why would anyone use so much time and effort in describing the "conventional" explanation that they stand against, and spent hardly any in describing their own position, for which they (arguably) feel passionate about. Seems to be common sense: speak about your idea, and allow us to decide if you are believable, don't waste time criticizing established ideas, at l;east not uintil your point is clearly made ands has some support
5. Birkeland died under 'mysterious circumstances' in Tokyo. Authors have claimed that he committed suicide. Go figure :/
6. THE WAY I'VE DESCRIBED IT IS TO JUST IMAGINE TWO MAGNETISED PARTICLES SPINNING IN SPACE WHERE THERE IS NO FRICTION WHATSOEVER AND AS THESE TWO PARTICLES SPIN THEN IT BEGINS PULLING MORE AND MORE OF THESE MAGNETISED PARTICLES TOWARDS IT AND THAT IS WHAT CREATES THIS GRAVITATIONAL PULL IS THAT SPIN, WHICH CAN THEN PULL ALL MATTER TOWARDS IT. ANYWAY, I THINK THAT'S HOW ALL THESE SYSTEMS ARE CREATED. IT'S NOT JUST ELECTRICITY ITSELF, BUT MAGNETISM IS WHAT ACTUALLY CREATES THE ELECTRICAL CHARGES. IT IS AN INVISIBLE FORCE, ONE THEY STILL CANNOT EXPLAIN, BUT OBVIOUSLY IT DOES EXIST. THEY KNOW IT'S THERE, BUT JUST DON'T KNOW WHY IT'S THERE. I'VE NEVER HEARD OR READ ANY GOOD EXPLANATION FOR THE PHENOMENON OTHER THAN IT JUST EXISTS. POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE CHARGES, BUT THAT STILL DOES NOT EXPLAIN WHY THIS INVISIBLE FORCE EXISTS IN THE FIRST PLACE EVEN THOUGH IT CAN BE SEEN THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE UNIVERSE.
7. Hmm. There seems to be a lot of evidence for a lot of the things you talked about. For instance black holes. There's been evidence of objects moving around very small areas with very high velocity that can be only explained by an incredibly dense object. This is how the supermassive black hole at our centre of our galaxy was shown to exist. What do you think about this?
8. Incredibly interesting subject matter. Thank you for sharing this.