The Perfect Cosmological Principle | Return of the Steady State Universe
About | Information | History | Online | Facts | Discovery
According to modern cosmology, the Steady State model of the universe, an alternative to the Big Bang theory, is now obsolete. Yet, modern cosmology faces devastating blows to Big Bang cosmology. "Dark matter" weakly interacting massive particles (WIMPS) have not been detected. Super-symmetry particles have also not be detected. The recent observation of gravitational waves has been discredited. The absence of these discoveries is a devastating blow to modern cosmology placing it on shaky ground. As the Big Bang and Inflation theory begin to loose their luster, the return to a steady state theory of the universe seems inevitable. We’ve been exploring the idea of three-dimensional time and applying it to physics. Multidimensional time isn’t a new idea by any stretch. Yet, a unique way of deriving three-dimensional time emerges from a set of simple and peculiar equations. Let’s suspend everything we know about time for a moment and open up our imagination. The concepts of ordinary time and time dilation found in physics have equivalences with our use of multidimensional time and are easily accounted for. These equivalences gives rise to temporal mechanics, a new approach to the concept of mass and how it relates to energy and conservation laws. Can multidimensional time be used to solve the unresolved problems in physics? existics101.com
Comments
-
Have you ever looked at Eric Dollard talking about electricity?
-
time, in one conceptualization, is an infinitely recirculating QM vortex at every scale, revolving on a super conducting zero axis (of "entanglement"). The measurable features are the interference results of superposition of one connection point/information identified by the combined function. So description is reduced to one featured identity "at a time", and it's always now.
-
time, in one conceptualization, is an infinitely recirculating QM vortex at every scale, revolving on a super conducting zero axis (of "entanglement").
-
The problem is most physicists have been looking at the universe back-to-front with the big bang theory, because by tracing time back to a single point in the past is a huge misguided misconception!!!.. . .
The zero point field now is the very beginning of Absolutely Everything .. . .Giving us a fresh starting point, or concept of zero in our mathematics.. . .Every moment is a new beginning +1=0 now -1 passing forever at the quantum level relative to their Own Energy or Mass as time unfolds C2 into the future.. . .With antimatter implosive energy compression representing the past, and potential future enfolding an organization process +1=0 now for -1 the continuous disorganization of statistical entropy as time unfolds.. . .Because our universe is really made of Spherical Standing Wave Structures.. . .Thus time space is quantized into becoming +1=0 now -1 passing moments.. . .
Only the frequency now is relative at each dipole magnetic moment of time becoming +1=0 now -1 passing forever.. . .Because Absolutely Everything is formed by a surrounding 4pi Spherical Inward Absorption +1=0 now -1 outward emission of electric waves.. . .All motion is 2pi Spiral therefore Schrodinger's Wave equation represents the forward passage of time itself.. . .And all 3D directions are 4pi Spherically curved therefore Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle is the same uncertainty an observer or observed will have with any future event photon by photon, quanta by quanta, or moment by moment.. . .We see all objects as they were in the passed from when those light waves were emitted.. . .Which is hardly the beginning of the entire universe.. . .And antimatter is just the opposite phase, or Vector Compressing Energy Contraction Absorbing Input +1=0 now at the center of their Own 3D Centered ref-frames.. . .Therefore explain the red shift with distance with Two Satellites Absorbing Energy receiver +1=0 now -1 sending output to each other as time unfolds into the future within there Own input +1=0 now -1 output Hubble Spheres.. . .And because they share 99.9999% of a common Hubble Universe.. . .Then their space-times overlap and therefore can interact exchanging energy input +1=0 now!.. . .But as their space-times become further apart then the time interval of information exchanges become longer with distance as they share less energy exchange with distance.. . .Just Take Two Input +1=0 now -1 Output Hubble Spheres . . ...Vibrate the side of a round bucket of water. . ...Because they have opposite vectors and quantum spin forming the positron +1=0 now -1 electron Wave Center.. . .4pi R2=/N pi Re2.. . .Or any dipole moment !!.. . .And then mathematically move the Two Satellites input resonance Vector directions +1=0 now away from each other.. . .Therefore what they are really observing is a division just the never ending expansion of time independent of the motion of their sources.. . .Just like dropping a pebble into a pond +1=0 now -1 the division expanding outward in between the crests and troughs their spiral wavelengths eventually become longer as their light spheres spread out over billions of light years relative to the input resonance vector direction of an outside observer Absorbing information +1=0 now sees longer spiral wavelengths first.. . .Wouldn't it be funny if its just because red light spiral wavelengths are longer.. . .And blue light has shorter spiral wavelengths LOL!!! -
The first principle is to denounce man made global warming and the universe is yours.
-
at 4:00 , the extra dimensions of time according to gavinwince are the Lorentz transform and its inverse. This is like saying there are extra dimensions of velocity in which "fast" is considered a dimension and "slow" is considered another dimension. This guy is pissing me off. Of course fast and slow are not dimensions because they are opposite values on the same scale, just as the Lorentz transform and its inverse are also just opposite values on the same scale. Opposite values are NOT extra dimensions.
-
This is amazing, I've long thought 3D space and 1D time can't possibly be sufficient to describe the universe. In many ways an arrow of time always pointing forward in time has an equivalent in gravity which acts as an arrow of space always pointing downward in space. My father the late physicist J P Wesley, author of the book "Ecophysicis" referenced in the book "The Singularity is Near" by Ray Kerzweil also wrote a number of books supporting steady state models.
-
The redshifting of photons is fascinating. The implication, if I'm understanding correctly, is that photons can, in fact, "age". If we assume that to be true, how then, could we devise an experiment to determine a photon's age... or rather... it's shift? Perhaps we could induce redshift in a photon travelling through some medium or perhaps run a photon past a massive nearby object (like the moon) and test its wavelength before and after?
Great videos! Looking forward to the next one! -
Congrats ! Brilliant & Elegant Insight. This has Great Implications on Travels... Nothing need be invented to benefit from the Dilation ! DR. TM HIMES
-
Hello Gavin Wince. Quite a brain you have there. Three dimensions of time. Been thinking about this for a while. Hah. It probably will sound out of left field, have you heard of Nassim Haramein? If you haven't, i would just like to ask you give his talks a listen. He claims to have measured the exact size (relatively)of the universe among other things?, due to a holofractal relationship between the plank length and it's bounded surface area to that of its information bearing content and ability for information to interact with the rest of the universe only across its surface? Ok I cannot explain this concept explicitly very well. He also has interesting demonstrations on wave particle duality as being an artefact of 3D vortex being represented incorrectly as a 2D sine cosine wave, all things spin and curl through torque? Not wave but spiral. The last thing I can remember off the top of my head that I could understand was his explanation of complimentarity of finite and infinite systems not competitive. He demonstrates this using the Star of David to show infinite fractal regress in a finite space. Sure you are familiar with that. My point mainly is that he inspired me to understand physics topologically and intuitively, and I haven't been as impressed with someone's conceptual ability since coming across your work so far a couple of days ago. You may well be horrified with Nassim Harameins work or it's direction or conceptual model, but could you take a look, as brief as long as it interests you, and comment on the cosmology as a whole? A specially the fractal nature. Fractals and the continuum and finite and infinity and the nature of dimension all interrelated and consensus definition of what these terms ..."mean" needs an infinite improvement :) hope you are well and using peer pressures that you encounter to further our understandings. Or highlight the relevent areas for development. Good use of calories, the greats always approve.
-
The moment when a truly gifted individual says brilliant ideas and no one else takes notice...
-
Dear Gavin, I like your ideas and the form you present these (in a modern way). Videos are really good and I am happy that the audio of this last video is finally normalized to the same level it is more enjoyable this way. I watched this and the previous videos several time.
My question is do the highly appreciated scientists in this video know about your work in this topic and if yes what are their opinions. -
Do charged particles have mass? To say Omega r is almost equal to 0 means nothing is false...it's everything. The negligible amount of mass in a charged particle suggests that a positive and a negative charged particle could join together in the same space but doubling it's mass and forming a 'light' neutron.Incidentally, a charged particle sounds suspiciously like perpetual motion.
-
This keeps me up at night! Could you engage with PBS Space Time to compare notes somehow? I need to know whether Existics is a math trick or a fundamental piece of the way we understand matter, time and cosmology, as a lay person. Both Wince and PBS are finally explaining physics in accessible language... now I need to see Wince's concepts tested and integrated more widely. Thanks!
-
What effect does the recent detection of gravitational waves have on this hypothesis?
-
This is very interesting. I wish I had the knowledge to either confirm or debunk this. But intriguing. IF this is quackery this is still genius level quackery then. Go vegan Gaven.
-
I cant stand KRAUSS he gives me the shits....
-
Let me start by saying that this is coming from a layman and as I'm typing this I'm only at the 50 minute mark (going to have to take a break and finish watching later). Assuming that the math hasn't just been pulled out of someone's ass, you seem to have a nice hypothesis going. Before any of this can become part of generally accepted theory, you'll need ways to prove and falsify the hypothesis. Once you're past that stage I'd say you'd be justified in having Chopin's Marche Funebre playing in the background while someone is talking about the Big Bang ;)
-
Hello Gavin, hope you're well, the original motivation to be here was similarities of aspects of your work - namely the all important insights peppered throughout - and the work of someone else. I'm more familiar now and the similarities really go deeper than I realized. As I say, it's the insights not the math, all which being brilliant and original to you. But the insights are fundamental as they guide the direction of math and knowing the outcome radically simplifies the challenge. I have requested an email address you can be contacted at, I don't know if you have not seen these requests or have forgotten or do not wish to provide it to me. You seem polite so I'm guessing you haven't seen my requests, as you've never responded at all, and I think it would be normal to say a few words if for whatever reason you didn't want to provide your email. Like I said, it only takes a minute to set up a new email account on Google, so if you have reasons to prefer not to share your regular email, you could easily do that. If at all possible please do provide me a way to write to you. You could do that just by emailing me...I've provided my email a couple of times.
0m 0sLenght
320Rating