The Missing Ceres Craters Mystery | Space News
About | Information | History | Online | Facts | Discovery
Scientists studying the surface features of the dwarf planet Ceres are proposing a new theory for its geologic history. One problem facing NASA investigators is the absence of exceptionally large so-called impact basins from collisions, which planetary scientists believe must have occurred over the dwarf planet’s supposedly ancient geologic age. Rather than considering that these giant impacts may have simply never happened, the investigators are proposing that mysterious processes have smoothed the surface of Ceres, erasing its largest craters over time. In this episode, we explore the evidence that electrical processes rather than periodic impacts created Ceres' craters. One of the numerous articles on the subject: The Case of the Missing Ceres Craters http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.php?feature=6577 SUPPORT US ON PATREON AND WATCH OUR INFLUENCE GROW: “Changing the world through understanding of the Electric Universe." https://www.patreon.com/tboltsproject Subscribe to Thunderbolts Update newsletter: http://eepurl.com/ETy41 The Thunderbolts Project Home: http://www.thunderbolts.info Essential Guide to the Electric Universe: http://www.thunderbolts.info/wp/eg-contents/ Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/thunderboltsproject Twitter: @tboltsproject Electric Universe by Wal Thornhill: http://www.holoscience.com/wp/ Electric Universe T-shirts and Gifts: http://stickmanonstone.com/ The ideas expressed in videos presented on The Thunderbolts Project YouTube Channel do not necessarily express the views of T-Bolts Group Inc or The Thunderbolts Project(TM).
Comments
-
SCIPOLICORP!
Is an ass!
( :O ) -
Please everyone, LIKE SHARE AND SUBSCRIBE! The future of mankind depends on information such as this. The future of mankind depends on YOU!
-
First of I want to say that I'm not the sharpest rake in the shed, so I do not claim what I will say is correct. But bees make hexagonal shapes, but in reality they build them round and then physics take over when the space inbetween them are filled up, so we know that this shape is not impossible to make naturally and that it just require a circular force.
Let say that something hit a smooth asteroid, this will create a almost round crater when the force is spreading out evenly, but if the same asteroid had areas that was mush harder and the asteroid landed near a area like that, then the spread of the crater can not be even. one side of the shockwave will stop first, but the forces is pressed out towards the sides, but some of the energy may bounce back in the other direction in a almost straight line, when that happen we have two straight shockwaves and the intersection will be at 120 degree and that forms a hexagon.
I know that I have a very hard time to explain this due to that English is my fourth language and that I'm not well educated, but is not the explanation that hexagonal craters can form due to different densities in the asteroid/moon more logical than space electricity? -
THANK YOU! At last most all the obvious things I have been commenting on for a long time on other sites is packed into one 6:13 video. This is a slam, elbow through the rim, in your face, triple reverse, dunk a punk, three point plus move. Way to own. Like most watching these vids know, we can't say everything is directly related to a plasma discharge, we can for sure call out our naysayers to justify there lack of experimental evidence that supports there opining's.. Videos like this make it impossible for any intelligent person to continue resisting an honest in-depth look, if for no other reason to try to prove these statements wrong and keep there University of higher learning positions. You have heard the saying "each one teach one", I say we should, "each one teach one, every day we can"
-
What if the planets start very hot, almost melting, which results in these craters we see on many of them?
-
Please note the odd features on the crater wall in this photo: http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/spaceimages/images/largesize/PIA20831_hires.jpg
It looks as though material has collected on the upper rim of the crater, reminiscent of wax drips on the side of a candle.
How would those be explained by the EU theory? -
NASA is a hoax. Using their data to critique their ridiculous theories is pointless unless you see the bigger picture. It's all fiction
-
Call them as you see them, if you don't see them make them up.Current science is so blind,Billy Y. has proven so much,I wish I could have seen show 12-13,000 years ago.
-
The only way for a meteor to accumulate charge is if it travels through electric fields, something Ceres does not have. No charge accumulation means no detonation. Ceres is now a dead world, as Steve mentions. The craters and other features formed centuries ago. No magnetosphere around Ceres, but it most likely was immersed in electric fields that are now gone.
-
why don't mainstream astronomers just keep quiet until they figure stuff out instead of coming up total nonsense... pre-existing stress patterns; it would be more likely that they were used for test firing a spaceship weapon. But hey, let's go with the most unlikely probability imaginable to explain something.
-
"when the dwarf planet was electrically excavated from a larger planetary body"
>'when', 'was' is past tense
> larger planetary body
Catch up, the EU community has moved past this.
I think its just Talbot that's stuck on this. Most EU adherents accept virtually all electric weathering is and was dark and glow mode, and continues at a normal rate today. Can't have arcing in a conductive medium. -
This research group is the number one.
-
Thank you 🌌
-
Remember "Omni" magazine, Thunderbolts needs a magazine like that filled with the sexy stories my parents didn't know were in it, that way the growing up nerds today can have their closet Penthouse and something to consider.
-
Was the Tunguska event also possibly an discharge event ? Reports state that it was very very bright.
-
Quick question. As we see little evidence of massive electrical discharges hurling ceres size chunks of planets skyward in the solar system today, is it the hypothesis of E.U promoters that one upon a time more free electrons existed here? Also the claim that electric discharges only strike straight down rather than at angled or glancing arcs seems contrary to our observations of the phenomenon: see every lightning picture ever. https://www.google.ca/search?q=lightning+strikes&client=ms-android-samsung&prmd=vin&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjDw7K95rbOAhWD7yYKHb5jCAsQ_AUICCgC&biw=360&bih=559
-
Could the bright spot then be a glass from the plasma discharge that simply didnt get dusted over?
-
hexagonal formations? Devil's table, Giants Causeway, Bolivia salt flats and a honey comb. Earthly formations unless micro sized meteors have struct inside of the hive.
6m 14sLenght
462Rating