The Electric Universe—Why Should I Care?

About | Information | History | Online | Facts | Discovery

1. 2:10 The Rainbow Serpent of Australian Indigenous legend?
2. I love this. New knowledge is tremendously important for inspiration.
3. all hail the Monster Magnet...
4. The youth aren't held back by disinterest.
   
   They're held back because science is seen as expensive.
   
   Money always get's in the way.
   
   "The entire money structured society is a false society."-Jacque Fresco
5. Don't blame youngsters. Blame your sell out generation for continuously voting for war criminals and imperialist maniacs throwing all of our tax dollar into Israel and an unexplainable insanely ginormous war budget. It's your fault, old man.
6. Most don't; not enough money or time to waste on crackpot theories; legitimate scientists have a hard enough time getting funding without putting up with the big foot, tin foil hat crowd; you tube is the proper place for em;
7. would this be considered pseudoscience in the mainstream community?  
8. i think we need to rediscover science.especially physics and electricity.
9. that is at the root of why younger generations are not exited about discovery now,as the video says we think all of the major discoveries have been made.,,imho
10. Nailed it on the head. Mainstream science is more interested in being part of a society rather than part of something greater. 
11. The Electric Universe Thunderbolts guys got it going on! Its like, you can feel it when its going in the right direction! Thanks so much!!!
12. how come whenever I go to watch an EU video, there's all this junk in the side bar about secret societies, comet Ison, holographs and some absolute nutter trying to say plasma is "poppycock"? Why so many whack jobs? Plasma cosmology is a science. A serious science. No one cares if you're saddened that plasma cosmologists "fail" to address your pet theory, whether it's "the holographic nature" of the universe or whatever. If it's not Plasma Cosmology, why would they address it? It's another field
13. Well said. Electricity can describe the mechanism, not the origin. I am saddened by by the unwillingness of plasma cosmologists to address the holographic nature of the universe in spite of the fact that plasma physics, like holographics is scaleable. The wave structure theorists also fail to address these things. The secret is in the similarities.
14. Enough to launch this planet along with its shining moon back into a guided and traveling through space satellite. 
15. no, it's not. it's beyond our comprehension if we do not realize that consciousness has a part to play in the Universe's making. 
16. We don't know how the universe began, thats just stupid to suggest such a thing, its likely something beyond our comprehension, that is, something emerging from nothing...
17. Yes!! I've been dying for a video like this.
18. But we must try our best not to let emotions blind us to the truth. Pseudoscience, rather than proposing and testing falsifiable hypotheses, tries to appeal to emotions. What you want to be true or what you fear to be true should be given no weight in evaluating what is most likely to be true. The hawker of pseudoscience is a preacher or a snake-oil salesman, not a scientist. Plus, I personally suspect that morality has solid roots in science. Emotions can just as easily destroy the world.
19. Exactly. Objectivity is rendered impotent if Bias doesn't exist. Same thing with the knowledge of good and evil and practically every opposites. One is rendered impotent without the other.
20. You realize that practicing science without emotions is IMPOSSIBLE? Show me one scientist that is totally devoid bias or emotions having no personal or emotional values whatsoever. You realize that practicing science without emotion can be dangerous? For the unbridled pursuit of knowledge someone tests a weapon that can potentially destroy the earth giving no care whatsoever to the inhabitants.