The Bankruptcy of Modern Cosmology, 2 of 3
About | Information | History | Online | Facts | Discovery
A new theory is on the horizon which removes non-causality and irrationality from outer space. Its about time!!!
Comments
-
So even though I think Talbott's (and his very regrettable convincing of Thornhill on this fact) belief that the Earth orbited and survived the breakup of a brown dwarf star a few thousand years ago ("proto-Saturn") is nuts, Alfven, the majority of Thornhill's beliefs, Eric Lerner, etc., and I'm leaving out many who should be named ... are on to something. It may not be the whole answer, but electricity and plasma have been given WAY short shrift in cosmology.
-
I think plasma cosmology has been short shrift. My thinking has been prompted into new orbits after years of passionate layman's studying the standard model. But ... Talbott influenced Thornhill to believe, based on a selective reading of myths and glyphs, that Earth orbited a brown dwarf star within human history, it broke up violently, became the 4 gas giants, and Earth settled into a habitable zone orbit around the Sun with humanity living to record the trail sans extinctions. Unlikely.
-
you are an idiot! go and study!
-
Haha, you'll find out why soon enough. You've taken the red pill. Welcome! And you should also be forewarned; the mainstream is going to attack you for this, hardcore.
-
""I dont know why this is supposed to be a new theory though" Well, Ive never heard of it. And if it is so old, why has it been in the background?" Its been in the background, because its observations, and Powerful predictions threaten Funding, Egos, Dogmas, History as we understand it. How do you imagine the masses would react, when they realize that the Earth is moving through and interacting with the Suns electrical environment, and all that can be implied from that?
-
I am dumbfounded, and I believe that philosophy is foundation for science, so i agree there. But you are wrong about an electrical theory explaining dark matter. You are very wrong about Relativity being merely fashionable. Do you understand at all what has been tested by experiment, which parts of this theory must remain in any improved version. btw, gravity is the weakest field, not "dominant"... we see its affect on large scales only because it is so weak.
9m 59sLenght
24Rating