String Theory: Explained in 3 minutes

About | Information | History | Online | Facts | Discovery

1. The music was so beautiful it made it hard for me to pay attention to your words. You helped me get an idea on the string theory though. Thank you
2. W against T, reference required.
3. misleading title..
4. Platonic string theory and the movies in your mind
   
   Dr Roger B Clough (NIST, retired) 7-2016
   
   Abstract
   
   Quantized perceptions enter the timeless, spaceless individual mind as a rapid sequence of harmonically vibraing strings (Schrodinger eigenvectors- the basis of strings ) which are instantly processed trifold and semiotically into conscious experience. To the everyday mind this appears as a movie.
   
   Introduction
   
   Here we model experience by incorporating basic concepts of quantum mehanics into Peirce semiotics and Plotinus' universal Mind (See Appendix A). These are bits of rapidly changing timeless, spaceless quanta in the mind (strings), which are the same as eigenvalues of consciousness in universal Mind. The bits of experience in perception (strings as signs) are moreover like movie frames, rapidly displayed to conscious mind so rapidly that experience, like a movie, appears continuous.
   
   --------------------The origin of strings----------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
   
   Roger Penrose [ ] has given us the quantized form of a raw experience. Since the quantum is in timeless spaceless mind, we can use the (rapidly changing) time independent Schrodinger equation on this on this time-independenent string:
   
   (-h.2m)*(d2 psi(x)/d2x ) + U(x)*psi(x) = E*psi(x) (1)
   
   
   This in turn is a string based harmonic oscillator with a discrete spectrum of rapidly changing eigenvalues (those of strings)
   
   En = (n +1/2)*hf (2)
   
   Discussion
   
   Why must conscious experience be processed as timeless, locationless quanta (strings)?
   
   a) All mental operations are processed in the timeless, placeless realm of Plato's Mind (These "snapshot" frames are then displayed as frames of a seemingly continuous movie in you mind).
   
   b) From Leibniz, we know that bits of experience are received as simple partless substances (monads), in other words, quanta.
   
   
   Leibniz's monad is not the same as the more familiar mathematical monad, it is a piece of mind.
   
   But although it is without parts, the mental monad is one aspect of a philosophical monistic dualism, the other aspect being a particle of brain flesh.
   
   
   The quanta are semiotic signs like the individual frames of a movie. Besides being rapidly changing, each sign is processed further into C S Peirce's Firstness (the Representatmen) Secondness (the Object or meaning) and Thirdness (conscious awarenesss by the One).
   
   i) Firstness. This is Penrose's quantum sensory nerve signal, which we refer to as raw perception, still unconcsious.
   
   ii) Secondness or apperception - each perception quantum is intended or thought on by the One, which makes them conscious.
   Otherwise, if not intended on, they remain unconscious.
   
   iii) Thirdness or self-awareness results from apperception.
   
   These are rapidly displayed in Plato's mind under cybernetic control by the One, and perceived frame by frame, but sppearing as a continuous "movie" by the brain and everyday experience.
   
   Conclusions
   
   Unless we are anesthetized or our eyes are closed this continues at least until the individual mind recedes into the universal Mind (the One)at death.
   
   
   ------------------------------------------------------------
   Appendix A
   
   What is Mind ? The One, which cybernetically controls the Many [monads].
   
   
   “The elements in their totality, as they stand produced, may be thought of as one spheric figure; this cannot be the piecemeal product of many makers each working from some one point on some one portion [materialism]. There must be one [top down] cause; and this must operate as an entire, not by part executing part; otherwise we are brought back to a plurality of makers. The making must be referred to a partless unity, or, more precisely, the making principle must be a partless unity not permeating the sphere but holding it as one dependent thing. In this way the sphere is enveloped by one identical life in which it is inset; its entire content looks to the one life. Thus all the souls are one, a one, however, which is infinite. ”
   
   - Plotinus, the Enneads, VI (9).
   ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   
   References
   
   1. Leibniz, the Monadology
   
   2. Peirce, Introductory works on his semiotics
   
   3. Penrose and Hameroff
   
   4. Plotinus, the Enneads
   
   -Ever since Hume, science has imprisoned us in the dark cave of materialism and empiricism and needs to restore us to the
   quantum sunlight of plato (plotinus) -- see my website https://independent.academia.edu/RogerClough
5. Wtf is this...
6. This kinda makes me wander... So, some people believe in more than one god, right? Maybe they talk about gods from other universes too?
   
   But for me, who only believes in the one and only, I wander if, when he talked about heaven after death in the Bible, maybe he meant a better and more prosperous universe. I know more than one church that believes in reincarnation and this just add to that.
   But then, it's just a theory. sigh Moments like this is when I want to see the world in 100 or so years from now!
7. I will pursue this theory, just because you cannot see something does not mean it is not there.
8. hey this is awesome !!! you connected lots of things together !!!  BTW this looks like some thing from FRINGE(TV series) [especially the part where multiple universes vibrate in different energy levels] 
9. Good for you!  Creative thinking lets you become a leader, a pioneer.  The alternative is to wait till someone else proves these theories.  We have people who believe the moon landing was a Hollywood stunt while at the same time others are busy planning our first Mars colony.  Technology is always light years ahead of the closed minded.  There is little difference between those who are unable to think and those who refuse to do so.
10. Hey lady! I liked your explanation of the String THEORY - key word. This sounds like a conversation I have amongst friends, when we are talking about 1 thing and end up jumping around to everything because EVERYTHING IS CONNECTED. It's all relative [theory] lol.
11. what is the music?
12. Editor's note: This is a speculative work of pure horsepucky from a devout and practicing moron. 
13. What the hell was that?
14. It's funny when evolutionist run out of fairy tale stories they end up making up more stories to fit their failed agenda lol
15. Reminds me of my ex . She didn't make any sense either.
16. To those who don't like the video and ask me to delete it, too bad.
    I tried to be frank in the explanation when I said this was done for a college class. I did use information from my own understandings as well as research out there. I also only had three whole minutes. The string theory is hard to summarize in so short a time. I also stated how DIFFERENT this would be.
    Also, you should just suck up the fact that it is a THEORY! It is meant to be discussed, contemplated and it is flat out not proven. Until more research comes out, this theory is basically a conversation starter. If I didn't know what I was talking about I wouldn't have done it, nor received the grade I did.
    I posted this on here for family and friends because they wanted to know what I was working on.
    I'm not going to delete something I find fascinating just because people don't like it.
    As for educational....it's really hard to find anything out there on the string theory. I very well could have misunderstood something but educational opportunities does not necessarily have to be robotic. I have a brain and ~I~ understood it this way.
17. You should delete this.
18. I admire your understanding!!
19. you should definately change the title of the video....it lurs people into thinking this is educational
20. You shouldn't talk about thinks you don't understand