Stephen Hawking on black holes - Professor Stephen Hawking
About | Information | History | Online | Facts | Discovery
Stephen Hawking on black holes - Professor Stephen Hawking Subscribe to the Guardian HERE: http://bitly.com/UvkFpD Highlights of a talk by Stephen Hawking, director of research at the Centre for Theoretical Cosmology within the University of Cambridge, covering black holes, M theory, the past and future, as well as lost bets. Hawking gave the talk at the Science Museum in London at the start of its exhibition on the Large Hadron Collider Click the Guardian for more on this article: http://www.theguardian.com/science/video/2013/nov/15/stephen-hawking-black-holes-video Click for more Guardian talks from the Science Museum: http://www.youtube.com/user/theguardian?sub_confirmation=1
Comments
-
stephen is a man following god but not religion.
-
Any facts on space ? Becausevi have a project on space due TOMORROW SO PLEASE
-
Speed it up to 1.5 your Welcome
-
U are so cool
-
Wait so our planet has more gravity than space so does that mean that in earth time is slower?
-
Smartest man on the internet
-
How can black holes exist, if the star, as it collapses, sheds off matter, how could it then be dense enough, to form a singularity or black hole?
Einstein said, they were not possible in the annals of mathematics in 1939. -
"The blacker the berry, the sweeter the juice."
-Steven Hawking on black holes. -
Q:
Do there exist galaxies with a constant
redshift,
or are all redshifts increasing? -
I
Stephen Hawking, an outstanding Scientist, an admired Man (read a Hero), a typical empirically biased Truth Seeker, by now unable to see that tackling the ALT, the Abstractest Layer of Thought, implies properly using the notion of infinity-The Only Independent Logic Tool-to correct the Emphasis upon (read Slavery to) the Finite given Language by Sensorily Biased Interpretations of Experience.
On the other hand Steph is a superb champion of "Fatti non foste a viver come bruti" !
II
"Creation" is from Sanskrit "kriyā", "activity", and was (not exclusively) used by Christian Leaders to mean "creatio ex nihilo" for (very disputable) reasons of their own.
The problem with running Physics (and Science in general, for that matter), as I see it, is that She has no human concepts to match with Experimental Discoveries cause Her vocabulary is "linear" (just like the vocabulary of Common Sense, one of whose Learned Extensions She certainly is) while Quantum Mechanics clearly points to the "Non-linear".
In other words, each and everything-in one's (obviously linear) experience-appears coming in and going out only because it complies with the Universal Condition, that is, with "Non-linearity" or, if so one prefers, with the Unmanifest / Aleph / Sagunabrahma / Tao (with name) / (Wittgenstein's space-time-less) Eternity / Simultaneity, etc.
The Universal Condition, on Her turn, rests upon infinity like Relative Numbers do upon Zero.
III
It was The Downfall that Thale's and Anaximander's Start of Logic passed far above the heads of their Peers and Descendants who reverently and vaguely called Her "philosophy", just Love for Knowledge, "Sophia", when Sophia mainly meant Esoteric Knowledge, exactly what The Two Milesians, the Authors of the Transfer from Myth to Reason, couldn't have meant !
So Newborn Logic shrinked down abruptly and Philosophies throve on feeding up Common Sense Language.
IV
What to do ?!
An Abstract, Human Language to match with Scientific Advancements is badly needed but (almost) None seems to be aware of the irreplaceability of Anaximander's ápeiron, of what can be grasped by the Subtlest Intellect alone !
(For details one can peruse my Yahoo Answers activity or G+).
[mkp th10mc16 16a41] -
i LOVE HIM
-
I don't think hes got it figured out. Were not supposed to know how all matter came into existence. I don't think everything just magically appeared. I believe theirs something else we have never known to be that is responsible for creation.
-
if he's so smart, why doesn't he walk?
-
respect to this man
-
If the world's leaders are going to take any notice of anyone n stop this madness leading us all to ww3 n distraction this is the man they should listen to professor we all thank you
-
its not possible to merge quantum size with General relativity because quantum turns into general relativity in fact it is an expression of itself just as a tiny seed turns into a big beautiful flower the seed expresses itself into the flower just as quantum expresses itself into general relativity it turns into beautiful equasions and eventually life itself ...once it turns and in fact is expresses we can,t merge it back into what it was anymore than we could put our bodys back into our mother,s womb ..we must look at it in this way and then when we use the geometry to go back only then will we be able to see why quantum atoms cannot re-emerge with itself once it has been expressed, its almost like us trying to fit into our little baby shoe,s when we are 25 yrs, old, ...take it from here Mr, Stephen Hawking,*
-
stephen I just can say well done
-
ask permission to share ...
-
He was trying to talk about himself and his family and friends. Not about science. And he realized that people simply considered him a robot man. And he started talking about science. I adore Mr. Hawking. He's not just a man in chair he's very proud of his family and friends and let him express it.
17m 26sLenght
622Rating