Starburst Galaxy Surprises Astronomers | Space News
About | Information | History | Online | Facts | Discovery
According to a recent press release, galaxy NGC 1222 is a “peculiar example” of lenticular galaxy. It is peculiar because lenticular galaxies are supposed to have used up the material available for new stars to form. NGC 1222, on the other hand, is described as a “starburst” galaxy, since new stars are said to be forming at a surprising rate. In this episode, TPOD managing editor Stephen Smith explores the Electric Universe explanation for this astronomical mystery. Original article (adapted for this Space News): https://www.thunderbolts.info/wp/2016/11/14/most-atypical/ If you see a CC with this video, it means that subtitles are available. To find out which ones, click on the Gear Icon in the lower right area of the video box and click on “subtitles” in the drop down box. Then click on the subtitle that you would like. SUPPORT US ON PATREON AND WATCH OUR INFLUENCE GROW: “Changing the world through understanding of the Electric Universe." https://www.patreon.com/tboltsproject Subscribe to Thunderbolts Update newsletter: http://eepurl.com/ETy41 The Thunderbolts Project Home: http://www.thunderbolts.info Essential Guide to the Electric Universe: http://www.thunderbolts.info/wp/eg-contents/ Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/thunderboltsproject Twitter: @tboltsproject Electric Universe by Wal Thornhill: http://www.holoscience.com/wp/ Electric Universe T-shirts and Gifts: http://stickmanonstone.com/ The ideas expressed in videos presented on The Thunderbolts Project YouTube Channel do not necessarily express the views of T-Bolts Group Inc or The Thunderbolts Project(TM).
Comments
-
What pisses me the fuck off is that I had to come across this theory on my own after decades of confusion trying to understand mainstream science and it's Big Bang , gravity BS. The fact that this theory doesn't get more complicated as more discoveries are made makes it one worth getting the funding not the Biblically correct Big Bang.
There's no reason we shouldn't be tapping into this vast battery right now as this would be an endless and probably virtually free form of energy and that's what I think is the main reason it isn't really pursued by the mainstream. -
highly interesting, merci.
-
Electrocinating! Thank you, Mr. Trump.
-
A very cohesive video, effectively summarizes without unnecessary ad hominem. Great job.
-
As always, easy to comprehend when it's the truth and makes sense. Can't believe more people can wake up.
-
<3
-
This really is history repeating itself. Electric Universe vs main stream science is like main stream flat earth model vs Galileo's round earth model, back in the 1600's, all over again.
-
The Electric Universe Theory is the only one that makes any sense, from the electric scarification of Mars to electric comets and stars. I believe that Sprites (a plasma event complete with Z pinch) are actually dispersing energy from the magnetosphere into the atmosphere during thunderstorms to equalize the charge and balance, not the other way around as main stream science suggests. Since when do Lichtenburg or dendritic figures indicate the coalition of energy? They always indicate disipation in other examples in nature. Our atmosphere is charged like a capacitor in my mind. I've seen street light fixtures light up during a dust storm as we were placing them, no conductors terminated yet. Motion frees electrons. Tesla was right. Thank You Thunderbolts Project. (Watch the Lord Kelvin water drop experiment.)
-
Yes, mainstream has a serious "gas" problem. It seems they can't even force themselves to use the correct terminology "plasma" because of the implications using the correct science would apply. But of course because they use the wrong physics in a universe 99.9% plasma they must insert 96% ad-hoc theory to make the numbers add up from using the wrong physics to begin with.
-
I am constantly amazed when scientists call plasma, hot gases and dust. If the universe is greater than 99% plasma, then how can most observable astronomical structures be hot gases and dust? Where is the plasma? Yet they rarely use the term plasma. If they would, they would realize that plasma behavior and properties must be more applicable than hot gas, and that the electric force dominates in a plasma universe, not gravity that is trillions of times weaker. It's like the brain filling in words that don't exist to arrive at meaning. When they see the stars and galaxies they see hot gases, and miss seeing the plasma reality that is right in front of their eyes. Wash away the dogma sleep from their eyes and they will clearly observe and understand the wonders of an electric plasma universe.
-
Tipping point?
-
star trek episodes from the 60s have more insight than current theory, which seems to be failing at warp speed
-
One day the mainstream scientists just might wake up to "smell the roses" of our Electric Universe, although their explanations and theories of the universe is a good place to get a laugh and shake your head at their utter stupidity and "fairyland".
-
When is main stream science going to realize that the Electric Universe Paradigm is the future of Astronomy?🤔
-
Fascinating. I wish more scientists would just accept this theory and really get started unraveling the truly interesting things. Not crazy ideas like dark energy, dark matter and black holes. The last I heard, was that apparently there's not just one type of black hole anymore. Gosh.
-
Stars do not explode.
-
Thank you
-
The evidence is really starting to be overwhelming. Thanks
-
Yet another example of how these idiots have NO idea of what plasma is...
6m 6sLenght
460Rating