Space-time explained

About | Information | History | Online | Facts | Discovery

1. Yes!  Space-time mixes to give light and mass.  When I hear light particles hitting my brain I see rays of space time circling the universe, but most people, like you, probably can't.  I can because I only move with brownian motion.  Since 6 x 7 = 42 and Pi is less than half of that --  you see what I mean...   Anyway, keep up the good work.  Scientists all over the earth will have to sit up and listen.  Truth!
2. I think x-rays are made by bouncing an "electrons" or lights through a low-energy-region, off of silver. I think the "rainbow-creation-effect" of visible light passing though a prism has same effect on light reflected off that same surface. Different space-time concentrations and patterns alter light(s) differently. Something about silver's space-time pattern @ to this one...interesting. So space-time condensed outer silver/thermal reflects to higher frequency. Light compression.
3. Very interesting. Explains X-rays too and how frequency is lowered to UV light thus allowing you to see skeletons.
4. Excuse me. I looked at what I wrote "out the other side of the wall at a much higher" should read as lower or longer wave length. Like converting 430 to 790 terra hertz visible light to something lower like thermal or infrared. Some lower frequency/wave length. Coming out of a black hole...could be a frequency near zero. You'd have to consider that gamma radiation frequency would be near zero also but still of a bit higher frequency.
5. I thought of a better way to explain a "wall". Say you shine a light on a black metal plate for a while. The plate will get hot. Feel the plate on the opposite side of the light and it will be hot. Heat is a form of light. A wavelength longer than visible light. Thermal. So yeah. Some light does pass through the wall and is "stretched" by the space and time of the atoms. Some walls are made of different atoms. Some atoms are more and some are less concentrated space-time.
6. Wouldn't need be shining for long. The space time warping causes space to curve. You may want to look at the BEC (Bose-Einstein experiments with light) Some of the light that hits at certain angles probably gets slowed in time and goes out the other side of the wall at a much higher and undetectable wave length. It would take a very long time for enough slowed light to leave a super star in order for it to lose enough mass to become visible.
7. 1:16 Then is it possible that if I shine a light at a wall, given enough of our time, the light will pass through? If the high density of a black hole has been "trapping" light in a slower space time, with enough time will the light eventually pass through, making the black hole become a sun?
8. I think at one time Einstein was using "vacuum energy" as a term instead of "ether". I think I see what he means by vacuum energy now. "low energy regions". This may be a "re-picturing" and it may be radical to some but I'm pretty sure the pictures and understanding I present (even though "rough") are as close to what is really happening (fundamentally) everywhere and in everything than anything previously written anywhere to this date. Surpassing Einstein in some ways. Believe it or not
9. I hope you're not suggesting I re-write this to show electrons to be something other than space-time compressed light because it is not. The same holds for all other subatomic particles and anti-particles. If you like being a stickler for precision language you should love reading the terms from QM. That language has no precision of understanding. I try to enlighten to the true nature of light frequencies, space-time warping/harmonics. Modern standard model terms are distraction at best.
10. That is not really willful sloppiness. I could do better on grammar. Hard to correct once I get it wrong in Mspaint. Some of what I'm trying to explain has no previous terminology. (You could say that my "plain language" can't get any more clear at times). I may try to make another video to make it more clear sometime. If you want to get hung up on grammar and let it discredit my understanding of space-time then so be it.
11. I could have put the grammar and ideas together better in some cases. I did the whole thing on Microsoft paint so that adds to the fragmentation but allows for some freedom. I'm a little worried that if I use big words the QM people might not understand what I'm talking about or (even worse) use it to come up with new terminology that makes no sense. I tried to stick to plane and accurate language. The whole thing could have used a lot more polish but if it gets the message across, meh.
12. What you write has no reference. QM people are confused. They are not tying the math to reality. Take a closer look at my videos. They make it much easier to understand real space-time than does old relativity and Einstein's publications. I don't understand the new importance of "information" in the QM arena. Practical? This is as practical as it gets. This is real. There is only one reality but at different times. 
13. Data could be relative but information cannot be relative. There is no information has relative structure. Information cannot be true and false at the same time or doesn’t change but data can. We are pulling out info from data by intelligence. Intelligence doesn’t accept relative info. Throw that ‘wave particle’ explanation. Make it practical information. If it is an ‘Information’ then it fits to everywhere in this SINGLE REALITY. My principle fits in for Zero, Gravity and on every QM detail. 
14. Maybe you should check my other videos. Wave particle is pretty simple.I've got a real solution based on the fundamentals that make up everything. d and t. space and time. Crossing light waves create amplification and interference as standing wave space-time differences. Those same differences (but from other sources), like atomic core, create things like magnetic field lines. Particle is just light as it passes through a lower energy region of space time. 
15. Is there a reason people spread disinformation about the reality of space-time or something or is QM so far gone that the people using it just go ahead and make up stuff as they go? My videos are based off of real understanding of space-time. You know, relativity. e=mc^2
16. Also wave and particle mixture is in lack of explanation. But now, there is a ‘Practical Explanation of Particle’ without insisting in ‘Wave’ dilemma. I’ve solved ‘The Double-Slit Experiment’ :) What do you want other than solution. 
17. You must understand things practically; as Einstein said, it must be simple. When you understand everything by physic, even mathematic is in contradiction; so it is not practical. Empty paper is a zero in geometry. If you draw circle on it, you divide zero as inside and outside but mathematically you are not capable to do the same. Also zero is not physical. When you understand existence of ‘physical zero’ or simply QM, these contradictions are making sense otherwise don’t use zero, ever.