Space Conspiracies with Bart Sibrel - Canary Cry Radio 086

About | Information | History | Online | Facts | Discovery

1. There are many excellent interviews with Bart Sibrel. But, in my opinion, this one has too many Biblical quotations.
2. amazing the Bart can believe in the Bible and not the moon landings
3. hey is Bart that fat pussy that got punched out by Buzz Aldrin? Like the fat annoying guy who looked like a massive cunt?
4. S as in sam B as in boy ... SamBoy it is.
5. Bart Sibrel was punched by Buzz Aldren for verbally harassing him. About the video that Bart "exposed"; they were far away from the moon after one day because the spacecraft moves faster nearer to earth and slower nearer the moon. Because the moon has a lower gravity and therefore a lower escape velocity than earth. I HOLD THIS TRUTH TO BE SELF EVIDENT: the united states landed on and claimed the moon for all humanity, in order to claim sovereignty over the earth and everyone on it. Because going to the moon is a lot EASIER than providing everyone with clean drinking water.
   AS FOR THE ORIGIN OF LIFE - it has to do with the formation of biomolecules being favoured by entropy.
   READ: https://www.quantamagazine.org/20140122-a-new-physics-theory-of-life/ .
6. why drag the bible into this? I mean sure you can do it from a scientific perspective (not necessarily in a mainstream science fashion) but talking in a religious way doesn't bring you far since the bible is also full of shit.. for example it promotes violence- raping and killing, etc. so what do you have to say about this? That God didn't mean it like that? I'm confused.. And what's so irrational about life on other planets? Didn't "God" create the whole universe, not just earth? Wouldn't that mean that he's in one place (like it says in the bible) meaning in one universe or whatever you might want to call it? And he's impartial meaning he doesn't take sides on different species (humans vs. other forms of life on other planets)? So many questions.. I just can't believe people drag religion into this.. It doesn't explain shit if you take it's teachings literally..
7. Great topic. BTW I cringed while watching "Astronauts Gone Wild". Great documentary and I appreciate the effort required to document this huge deception.
   
   As an issue of common sense the this lie is mortally arrogant. All one has to do is apply it to one's life. A family would not buy a $750,000 home when they fail to make the household budget each month. The arrogance of suggesting our government budgeted a multi million dollar effort to travel 300,000 miles away to explore the moon suggests there was no poverty within the United States in 1968. It would be sinful to budget such a project while ignoring our poor.
8. When people invent elaborate mythologies and fictions like the Apollo moon landing hoax conspiracy theory, it's important to remember, that it's never about the theory, it's about the theorist. Conspiracy theorists latch onto a few perceived anomalies as the basis of their theory and ignore the mass of contradictory evidence. They also tend to ignore any reasoned rebuttals of their ideas, and any information that would tend to contradict what they are presenting, no matter how convincing. They are always willing to replace the obvious with the preposterous, because it's really not the theory that's important, but the idea that they have special knowledge that the rest of the public does not have, and that they have uncovered a secret that most of the rest of society is too blind, brainwashed or stupid to see. These things are very important and dear to our conspiracy theorist. They will look past reams of evidence and testimony to find that one little bit, the hair on the negative, lens flare in the photo, the misspoken word, the missing document, and conflate this into a massive myth that literally requires the collusion of thousands of people to seemingly be possible. This is how the legend of the Apollo moon landing hoax was born, when one disgruntled ex-technical librarian with an axe to grind made up a story about faking a moon landing. People being who they are, some believed it, since they have a need to believe in secrets and conspiracies, even though the information in that book was quickly debunked and shown to be nonsense. But it survives to this day, providing more fuel to the people who feed off conspiracies as a way to feel special and superior. Since the Apollo missions are now some 45 years in the past and we have several generations who didn't witness them or understand their context, they continue to find a ready audience for their nonsense. All the sensible people can do is continue to point out the truth as history has recorded it.
   
   The Apollo program and lunar landings were undertaken with the expectation that other countries, particularly the Soviet Union, would also be landing on the moon within a few years or perhaps even months of the NASA effort. Faking the Apollo missions would have been a seriously risky proposition, based on the fact that not only might another country choose to land near an Apollo site, but eventually others would explore or colonize the moon and find out that the missions had been faked. Therefore, regardless of the many debunked claims made about inadequate technology or deadly radiation, or other such nonsense, there was no real incentive, ever, to "fake" anything about Apollo, given the whole thing was under world scrutiny. What would NASA have done if they had faked it, and then 5 or 10 years later somebody else had landed there and found out the whole thing was a hoax? It would have precipitated a major political crisis, obviously. So given that, it's pretty clear, aside from the mountains of evidence and data freely available to anyone, that the Apollo program was genuine and the landings happened as recorded, that "faking it" would have been completely unacceptable, even assuming there had been any motivation to do so, which there was not. The many thousands of engineers and scientists who developed and worked on the Apollo program were honest people with scientific integrity. No one has ever seriously called that into question, nor has anyone ever come forward with the slightest evidence of dishonesty or deception. People making these claims do so only out of their own personal delusions and vendettas, and lack both knowledge and credibility.
9. Bart is gonna get waxed
10. Check out "bad astronomy" guys
11. Bart Sibrel is just a stupid money grubbng lying fat jew.. he is 100% wrong.
12. Bart Sibrel you are the bumbest fuck ive ever seen.Buzz changed you face very nice i would do the same.Its paradoxal that the religulous people who do not "believe"in evolutin are acting like the monkeys,not even some advanced spieces of monkey,you are just the bumbest baboon on the savannah.
13. Very good interview. Thanks for posting it!
14. What is this 3 minute musical travesty shit openning up this gig? Someone got baked and got carried away thinking he's a genious.
15. This moron imagines he can figure out everything totally without knowing anything. What he doesn't realize is that Carl Sagan was talking about HIM!!
16. IT IS REALLY A SHAME THAT PEOPLE WITH INFO TO SHARE TOTALLY INSIST ON PLAYING LOUD CRAPPY MUSIC WHILE THE AUDIO IS PLAYING SO YOU CAN'T HERE WHAT IS BEING SAID WHETHER OR NOT IT IS LOUD MUSIC INTERMITTENTLY OR DURING THE ENTIRE VIDEO PLEASE GET RID OF THE LOUD MUSIC
17. lol at 1:20, how even our old government could be made happy with a balloon and a lollipop. i really am from the dumbest country in the world. no wonder i turned out like this
18. Armstrong was done in after his heart surgery because he was becoming a loose cannon. Perfect time to do it. His operation and recovery went perfectly and then all of a sudden he dies? Tried to look up what actually killed him but nothing of any specifics could be found. Then he is of course cremated and thrown in the sea..Bart if you want to do something new in research about the moon hoax look up the specifics of Armstrong's death.
19. lmao this guy thinks he can interpret the bible.
20. Alot of good points from Sibrel (and his docus), thanks guys. You show great impartiality as interviewers. Can't wait for this all to come together. Aliens may be bs, but is space bs too?