Quantum Cosmology and a Theory of Everything Physical

About | Information | History | Online | Facts | Discovery

1. isnt Jing and Yang an ancient visualisation of WaveParticle interaction.. just percieve it in 3D and 4D..
2. I was just curious if you've heard of the Collignon flat map projection of the Earth and if you might consider its potential concerning quantum mechanics ?
3. Wtf Pinoccio is that you?? Fucking super cringe video I hate when people use cool looking pictures as bait for their videos.
4. *writes a couple little equations on his whiteboard to make himself seem smart.
5. The logical inversion of an expanding universe with static contents is a static universe with collapsing contents. The latter is the correct conceptual model for interpreting quantum mechanics. See C.M. Langan's CTMU theory.
6. You seem very open minded and intelligent. You should look up the CTMU by Chris Langan...its fascinating 
7. Would love to see a video about the breakdown of the physics of a Black hole.
8. uncertainty prediction, light, with no relative mass(if it did its said it would be around 4*10^-48g), and no relative charge, but still effect particle momenta and velocity
9. kool ty
10. If light is a wave, then what is waving? I mean, water waves, but it consists of water molecules. Are there some kind of light "molecules". Or is light space itself waving? And Nassim Haramein explains that gravity keeps atom nucleus together, so no strong force is required.
11. I am suspicious of any theory that is published or popular. The most guarded technologies would not be taught in every university in the world. There is a book called The Trouble With Physics by Lee Smolin where he explains that physics professors will not allow students to stray from the approved lesson plan. These so called experts and others are guiding everyone down the same path with no room for deviation. I believe this is a disinformation campaign designed to keep everyone from finding out the truth.
12. Man made number will never reveal the truth of the universe.  To define the whole of the universe mathematics will have to be too fine tuned to describe this notion.  We cant even define the exact area of circle for Christ sakes! how can we even begin to understand the universe if we cannot know everything of a simple two dimentional object such as a circle!
13. So the crystal ball in theory could actually work?
14. I think the term should be intellectual arrogance--that we somehow have a complete understanding of everything at this moment with what we know now.  Think of how destructive this is because where we be without pure research or inquiry just for the sake of curiosity?  Great work.  Thanks.
15. I'm not a scientist, I will be honest. But I know science is a dogmatic materialistic cesspool of slavery. Can you guys please explain to me if you share the same mindset as Jason Verbeli or 77Gslinger?
16. Please be better than kako or what ever his name is and get back to me. 
17. Tetryonics no ego go see how simple quantum physics is when you know the very thing you are describing with all those numbers like square numbers are really just triangles 3300 illistrations
18. Now u have 2 pi that you can see. mathmatics is the langauge of the universe but geomitry is the grammer. sorry my writing grammer sucks like our current physics....Tetryonics
19. What. is energy? The achants are yelling the answer. Equal lateral. triangle. we call them energy quins. like a coin 1 side positive. 1 side negitive. draw a circle around it
20. This is another open call to you AS. love the talk and agree with it all. however the most important thing is missing. you mention it so much. plancks distance. Einstein called it quanta and your teacher telling you. not to question to shut up and calculate. the answer is simple and elegate.