Plasma Physics' Answers to the New Cosmological Questions by Dr. Donald E. Scott - Full Video

About | Information | History | Online | Facts | Discovery

1. who was the person that was being quote at 1:00:50 ?
2. Just to be clear. Electric Universe Theory has NOTHING to do with 'Jesus Christ' or 'God'... Not all EUT community is subsumed by creationist nonsense or theology. It annoys the hell out of me that there is a pocket of EUT advocates that use it to somehow justify their religious beliefs when quite clearly the ONLY creation myth that does support their beliefs is the standard 'Big Bang' model.
3. To bad the obvious reality that the electric universe theory is correct will never change the mainstream paradigm. Because a closer look shows that this would them lead to the truth of Jesus Christ having created the universe.
4. N atonal
   A nal
   S ex
   A trocities
5. 69 is not bad at all.
6. took them chumps to school.
7. why bring up buy bull crap, love the thunderbolt stuff but a lord and savoir I can't do, I was almost enjoying the common sense of it until the Jesus crap, I'm sure all religions have a basis of truth but this guy lost me with the Jesus bull!
8. @ 12:20 - I am astonished that Dr. Scott neglected to mention Nikola Tesla's name again here in conjunction with the discussion of the explosive effects of high voltage DC dynamos. In the late 1880's, Tesla was hired by Edison to study and fix this exact phenomenon. He made corrections that prevented this occurrence and also developed his high frequency apparatus based solely on the observation of the explosive force that this transient wave produced when confronted with the high impedance of the transmission line. It is appalling to me that Alfven was given credit for a discovery which Tesla made almost an entire century prior.
9. @ 10:00 - Dr. Scott neglected to mention Nikola Tesla who experimentally replicated the aurora borealis in his laboratory at regular atmospheric pressure with high voltage high frequency apparatus circa 1895. Tesla often spoke about how the sun was responsible for the Aurora Borealis, and he had publicly held university lectures which touched upon the detailed theoretical and experimental analysis of this connection. Too bad his name is scarcely mentioned in any of the sciences which he personally laid the foundations for.
10. Science is a collective effort and accumulation of knowledge. While people get credit for their discovers, they become the bricks of the structure of understanding being built.
11. I have been fortunate enough to meet Dr. Donald Scott at the Kronia/thunderbolts meetings in 2000 in Portland Oregon. I have a signed copy of his book, ( The Electric Sky ) which is a very good book, well put together. Don says he is happy to be a thunderbolts member, and I am glad he is, as he adds much to the electric universe paradigm. For those of you who are like me a student for life his talk here is like getting to get an added education for free. James M. Kenyon
12. "And then along came James Clerk Maxwell"--I think not. Henry Cavendish originated just about everything concerned with electricity---including all of the ideas of Maxwell, Ohm, and others. Again we see the scientific community virtually stealing the work of one and crediting another with that work.
13. there are writings of thousands of years ago that the universe sun moon earth are electric "EL"  least we forget some of these early scientists were readers of such ancient wisdom's such as Hermetic science and other little known and well kept secrets from our history.The electric universe theory or science is as old as dirt just hidden and forgotten over all from the masses. I guess we could say all the years in between these early wisdoms and current hack theories we were actually going backwards with such ideas as quantum physics or theoretical physics. Red shift and expansion are just blow me ideas they are not true as we will learn Again in the near future.
14. This lecture is fantastic. I often think that science is hindered by the lack of interdisciplinary research.
15. Thank you for uploading this video.
16. A well delivered speech by Dr Scott. This is a speech on plasma cosmology and the "Electric Universe" theory at NASA's Goddard Centre. Enjoy
17. I am a cautious supporter of the model put forth by the plasma physicists and electrical engineers referred to as the "electric universe" model of cosmology. Their theories are more coherent and make more sense than the gravity based theories. They don't require the laws of physics to break down, are consistent with laboratory results and correlate well with new radio telescope data.
    But I have a an issue I would like Mr. Scott to address regarding a point he emphasized during this presentation. The Magnetic Reconnection Experiment is a small experiment going on at the Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory. They have published about a hundred studies which seem to confirm the concept of magnetic reconnection starting in 2003 and the latest being in 2013.
    The concept of magnetic reconnection is employed to explain the exceptionally high temperature in the corona vs. the relatively low surface temperature. This poses a big problem for the standard model of nuclear fusion generated energy radiating from the core of the sun. Mr. Scott has stated that magnetic reconnection does not exist. How then, does he explain a decade of published work coming out of the Princeton Plasma Physics Lab??
18. I wonder what are your thoughts on the Geocentric view of the Universe? There appears to be a lot of evidence in favour of this understanding. I think you might have something interesting to say.
19. Put this guy on TV with rest of the Thunderbolts crew and get rid of the so called experts that talk RUBBISH.
20. I love everything tesla and plasma physics