Planetary scars Plasma Cosmology Astronomy
About | Information | History | Online | Facts | Discovery
Plasma Cosmology. Mysterious planetary scars on the planets and moons of our solar system. These continue to shock, surprise, and confound mainstream astronomy, although there are simple, verifiable answers at hand. Birkeland, Alfven, thunderbolts, lightning, thornhill, perratt, talbott. Thunderbolts of the gods. Electric Universe. www.thunderbolts.info www.plasmacosmology.net
Comments
-
@soupdragon42 This Keijo Parkkunen is really intresting old fellow(born 1927!), his book("Sadan Vuoden Harha-askel" in engl "One Hundred Years Falsestep" ) came already 1984. He has studied those ´holes´ and also so called ´devils-fields´, which are full of round rocks and has come to conclusion that all these are formed in big cosmic catastrofe: Bible´s deluge, where heavens waters rained with heavy thunders and electrical forces 40 days and nights. In utube there´s interview in finnish.
-
What about round holes in rocks which are quite common in Scandinavia. Official theory is that they are formed in ice-age by water and stones and millions of years(to science everything is possible when you take at least million of years). Finnish ice-age critic Keijo Parkkunen has studied those holes(in finnish they are called "Hiidenkirnu") and find that they were actually formed by great heatness, because there was trace of melt rock at bottom.
-
I need a scientist or an engineer that understands electromagnetism to contact me immediately. I am a serious as a heart attack. I have no need for cash proceeds and this is not a sales offer. I just want credit, because I will not tell someone about my thought unless I get credit for it.
-
@alien8ted Like FTL?
-
@RedressOfGrievance I also agree with this.
-
As much as I love new theories, speculations and facts (mostly facts). This video seems to bother more on clashing with something the author labelled as "mainstream", seemingly more preoccupied with some kind of a political issue then anything else, and that NASA comment right at the end is just the final kick in it. BUT, since it caught my interest, the theory itself, I'll visit the sources, I do advise as a constructive criticism, to focus more on the theory and leave side issues apart. Cheers
-
@soupdragon42 Me too! People who consider themselves to be intelligent piss me off when I tell them my view and they really can't see it? The 10 commandments have been replaced by the laws of physics. For a while now many celebrities have been helping to usher in the scientific religion and I'm positive it will be much like christianity in the next century. Only time will tell.......
-
@russthekaiser You have no idea how long I've been trying to tell people this!!! Science IS the new religion and it's been so cleverly manipulated that people actually think your mad if you say that because the general public believe science regardless of what you tell them, our generation has been brought up to think science = truth/fact ie "it's a scientific fact" it's the perfect religion in term's of what me and you consider religion to be....if you know what I mean. I'm so relieved.........
-
Nothing so Advances the Cause of Science as the Death of Old Scientists.
-
In time you will come to understand science has been very similar to religion.
-
maybe, just maybe an impact to the crust of the Earth can be deep enough to disput the magma underneath it and you occasionally for a volcano in the center of the meteorite impact due to that being the point of penetration. Common sense humanity, there is no need for your self induced headache.
-
mabey they'll build a bigger one
-
Has anyone ever stopped to think about frame drag? Electrons have some mass. Electrons are moving at extreme speeds. Frame drag compresses space time. One drop of water will not move a mountain but a flowing river can completely destroy it. Can electrons coming in from multiple directions compress space-time? Where will people turn when the Bose-Einstein Condensate turns up missing at CERN? What will people do when they come to the conclusion that there is no such thing as a graviton
-
Of course the grand canyon was created by erosion. But....what erodes on those plantes? does water flow? do you think god created planets in perfect shapes with smooth surfaces?
-
Great video. Keep up the good work
-
The Grand Canyon is an example of large planetary electrical scarring. If you look at an elevation map, the start of the river goes OVER the plateau instead of around it. Also the debris is not present at the end of the river, or anywhere for that matter. google planet X
-
Finally. It's good to see good, reasoned arguements that actually set out ot answer these questions. It's like we have been told by our forefathers for 5000 years that the skies have changes, well now we know why. Plasma is very very memorable.
-
This video, and conversation, is about mainstream astronomy and their mainstream scientific theories. Why are you being deliberately obtuse? Well, at least I hope it's deliberate.
-
Uhm, did you forget we were talking about astronomy and cosmology?
-
When was the last time your mainstream theories have predicted ANYTHING correctly?
7m 57sLenght
82Rating