New Discovery Invalidates The Big Bang
About | Information | History | Online | Facts | Discovery
This video highlights a recent discovery that invalidates our ideas of expanding space and the "Big Bang". For more information on how we know the Big Bang never happened, check out the Thunderbolts project at http://www.thunderbolts.info or visit my personal site at http://sites.google.com/site/cosmologyquest/default You can also watch a full feature length video on the subject at: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4773590301316220374&q=electric+universe&ei=pcZFSJG2D4TQ4gKD-8WJDA&hl=en This video and my web site are not affiliated with the Thunderbolts project. Some published papers on the subject: http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0203466 We present new spectroscopic observations of an old case of anomalous redshift--NGC 7603 and its companion. The redshifts of the two galaxies which are apparently connected by a luminous filament are z=0.029 and z=0.057 respectively. We show that in the luminous filament there are two compact emission line objects with z=0.243 and z=0.391. They lie exactly on the line traced by the filament connecting the galaxies. As far as we are aware, this is the most impressive case of a system of anomalous redshifts discovered so far. http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0401147v1
Comments
-
Hello Cosmology Quest can you give me the title of this ? please.. cause the link is dead... good work bye bye..
"You can also watch a full feature length video on the subject at:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?doc..." -
The Big Bank Theory was invented by a priest. It is just another creation myth.
-
Ok. I gave this a chance and thus I was move... I'm joking, these galaxies could be coliding due to gravity. Just another fool trying to debunk the big bang with one weak point.
-
the bright object that appears to be connected to the galaxy on the right by a plume of plasma is a quasar. the quasars are heavily red shifted. according to red shift theory they should be 11.9 billion light years away and the light from them would not have reached us yet anyway but yet there the quasar sits very bright in the night sky. Its red shift also says it is travelling many times the speed of light too. The explanation is. red shift theory is totally wrong or at best entirely in accurate. hence the doubt about the so called big bang theory.
-
you forgot one thing if one of those galaxys was indeed twice as far as the other one the much further galaxy would be MUCH redder and they're pretty mush the same color
-
Halton Arp found other examples of this phenomenon. There are other reasons that the big bang theory is questionable at best..
-
big bang exist from a speculative mind or something really imaginative person, you know who they are...
-
It is a matter of FAITH
evolutionist have faith in a big ban theory a theory not factual
and the other team has faith in a Creator
Has anyone seen evolution actually occurring before their eyes?
Last time I checked explosions only destroy matter...I was in my beloved US Marine Corps and blew shit up in Iraq... -
yes excellent version of the moonlight sonata taboot
-
Halton Arp
-
After the discoveries made public the other day maybe you should take this video down you dumb fuck.
-
... well the music is excellent anyway
-
Wait, the 2 scientists were not americans so their finding mean nothing.
They're probably mexicans. -
Everything in NATURE is incredible and scientists only begun scratching the surface, if you walk into a museum of art you would not speculate the paintings just appeared or maybe an explosion made them possible, RIGHT? Use your logic assholes, things were created, intelligent designer GOD...
-
Yes GOD created the universe
-
I'm curious, elsewhere you point that the time correction for gps is too small to be considered fact, but the milliarcs correction to Mercury precession is ok? Evidence to RT is abundant and convergent. Like any good theory, RT also makes previsions, which were all falsifiable and proven true. Heck, how magnets and electricity work, and I'm pointing special relativity, which was an idea just waiting to be formulated by a number of scientists in early 1900's.
-
Plasma Redshift ?!?! Are you real?! It doesn't match the observations, and science is all about observing the universe/nature around us! Observations point away from this speculation, you cannot even formulate an hypothesis. I used to work with radioisotopes back in university days, I can tell you first hand, Iodine, Calcium, Phosphorus, Sulfur, Cesium and Carbon decay are pretty much constant. Where do you get your "facts" from? Neutron stars have not been observed, but white dwarves do.
-
*Sigh*... I used to work in the telecom industry. GPS is not a dogma, in the first stages of the GPS implementation, technicians disabled the clock correction in the satellites just to see what happened. Guess what? Error accumulated on daily basis. Ofc scientists knew this, that's why they designed the system the way it is in the first place, but skeptics had to check. Satisfied, they turned the internal clock on and proceed with the deployment. Do some checks beforehand, please.
-
Oh, dear. Relativity, special or general, is everywhere, proven time and again, where do you live?! Time goes faster for someone in speeds well above ours, sounds crazy? If you don't correct for relativity GPS wouldn't work, the clock in the satellites ARE different from Earth's. Eclipses showed gravity bending space and showing stars that otherwise would be behind the black disc. Laser, plasma on TV, Neon adds, Fluorescent light, the evidence is everywhere in the technology we use 0.o
-
The many technologies that only work if we account for relativity...are all very strong support. For example, GPS would be too inaccurate to be practical at all, if not for calculations involving relativity. When things works because we assume something to be true, and don't work when we assume them to be false, it is stupid to continue assuming them to be false without a better alternative.
2m 33sLenght
177Rating