NASA's Unmanned SpaceX Rocket Explodes Minutes After Launch

About | Information | History | Online | Facts | Discovery

1. NASA, saying there not involved, Bullshit !! Govt, NASA lies more then people realize, then fails again and again lucky it didn't kill any one. Wasted billions. Give it a break DUMBASS
2. well that turned in to the worlds most expensive firework.
3. SpaceX "challenger incident" spaceXversion
4. oops!
5. Luckily, the next one will have some americans on board it...
   Don't worry, Elon was insured and he'll have figured out why it blew up by the next flight... probably. Maybe.
   Anyhow, don't worry... Elon is insured, as well as not aboard
   Who wants to be an american astronaut now?
   Get in line... no pushing at the back.
6. "vehicle on track ....................................vehicle on track.........boomboomboom......... appears to have had a launch failure........... appears to have had a launch vehicle failure....... standing by..........." So who makes these things?
7. WAIT WAIT I THOUGHT WE HAD THIS FIGURED OUT IN 1969?!!!! LIOLOLOOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL YOU GOTTA BE AN IDIOT TO BELIEVE IN NASAS GARBAGE LOL KEEP DREAMIN ABOUT HELIOCENTRICITY....WHEN IT EXPLODES.....BRING YOUR EYES BACK DOWN TO LEVEL.... AND LOOK AT THE FLAT HORIZON LINE.....THEN THINK ABOUT HOW YOU WASTED YOUR TIME LOL.
8. This is what happens when there are too many Indians in NASA. LOL...
9. Stop falling for the hoaxes people. You have been brainwashed over time with Hollywood fantasy and nasas fake Hollywood imagery and animations.
10. NASA prepares ahead for 4th of July with pyrotechnics. 
11. "NASA's Unmanned SpaceX Rocket Explodes Minutes After Launch"
    What? It's not a NASA rocket, the title should be "SpaceX's Unmanned Falcon 9 Rocket Explodes Minutes After Launch"
12. To all those commenting about NASA. This is a SpaceX rocket. Also, the Falcon 9 aims to be reusable. This is an ambitious task that requires a lot of trial and error.
13. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eFbIYobTh4s
    
    The National Aeronautics and Space Administration also known as the Brotherhood of LIES they are only showing us the DisneyWORLD version of space and everything else to do with the universe communications is also a lie, This is the information age and WE KNOW, they cant hide anymore soon their evil maSONIC empire of lies and deceit MUST fall!!!! I see no evidence of satellites for example seeing your car other than google earth still shots I think its all done with airplane reconnaissance .. military government use high altitude drones for REAL TIME spying also we must remember nano tech and secret classified tech that does not include space orbiting satellites, when you look up at the night sky and say look satellites going across are really secret high tech real time drones reconnaissance and wtf are chemtrails for and the unconventional looking plane sprayers check out this video -
14. Apollo and Nasa Lies revealed by Marcus Allen
    
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hGwIpx67s9w
15. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wxFWF8NPOio
    
    The sheer number of inexplicable anomalies and apparent impossibilities shown in some of the Apollo photos and videos has led me to the firm conclusion that they were not taken under the conditions that NASA has led us to believe.
    
    Using photo and video editing software, it is often possible to detect how a photo or video was put together. Many of the NASA Apollo images and videos allegedly taken on the moon, show tell-tale signs of crude compositing and re-touching, as well as the use of studio lighting, stage backdrops, scale models, Scotchlite screens and even chroma-keying. These photographic and video anomalies alone are enough to cast serious doubt about whether they were taken on the lunar surface, but this represents only a small amount of the large body of evidence proving that Apollo moon landings, as shown in the official NASA archives, are an elaborate work of fiction.
    
    From my observations, I have come to the conclusion that all of the 12 alleged moon walkers presented to us in the Apollo videos and photos, were actually played by the same two actors. From a production perspective, there would be no need for any more than 2 actors, as their faces would be hidden by a visor for all of the moon landing footage. They probably also used some audio and video footage of the real astronauts taken previously during training simulations. Most of the Apollo space program was real, including blast-off and splashdown. But the part about landing on the moon was fabricated.
    
    As with all conspiracies of this magnitude, the only way the truth can ever come out is if the perpetrators openly admit what they did. Unfortunately, this rarely happens. However, if the Apollo landings were faked, there are a number of good reasons why the truth will come out soon. Firstly, there are many more space agencies on the planet than there were a few decades ago, that are all interested in exploring the moon. And some have already made good progress. If any of these space agencies attempts a manned lunar mission in the future, and the photos and videos of the moon differ significantly to those of the Apollo missions, then people will start to ask serious questions. Within another few years, it may even be possible for individuals to send their own probes to the moon's surface and beam back video straight to their iPods. And if any of this imagery contradicts NASA's Apollo moon imagery then this would blow the whole scam wide open for all to see. But you don't need to wait until then to confirm for yourself that the Apollo moon landings were faked. All you need to do is listen to NASA's excuses as to why they haven't sent a human being further than 300 miles from Earth since 1972.
    
    If NASA wants us to believe the Apollo moon landings were real, the onus is on them to provide irrefutable evidence to support their claim, and they have failed to do this. The photo and video evidence can be discounted because of the many inexplicable anomalies they contain, and by virtue of the fact that it is possible to create realistic images of the moon using a studio set up. The moon rock evidence can also be discounted because the same rocks can easily be found in Antarctica. Also, a piece of moon rock that NASA gave to the Dutch national museum turned out to be nothing more than petrified wood. In any case, in order to collect rocks from the moon, you do not need to send humans there. The Soviet Union was using robotic landers to collect moon rocks in the 1960s and 70s. As for the laser reflector on the moon, this does not prove that humans landed on the moon. A reflector could be landed on the moon just as easily as a probe. But in any case, in the 1960s the Soviets showed that they could bounce laser beams off parts of the moon's surface without the need for a laser reflector. So we can't even be certain that there is a laser reflector on the moon anyway. And as for claims that the Soviet's were able to track the Apollo craft all the way to the moon and back, well that's a big red-herring because the Soviet's were only able to do this from 1972, which incidentally, was just a few weeks before NASA cancelled the Apollo 18 mission and abandoned the rest of the program altogether. None of NASA's so-called evidence proves they actually sent humans beyond Earth orbit or landed them on the surface of the moon. On top of that, NASA has made itself look even guiltier by attempting to cover up their sloppy mistakes in the photographic record of the Apollo program. They have recently been caught altering and removing the incriminating photos from their website in an attempt to cover their tracks. 
    
    As for a conspiracy like this needing thousands of people to keep secret, well that's a red-herring too, because in reality, the Apollo program was completely compartmentalized so only a handful of senior insiders would have needed to know the big picture.
    
    Peace out,
    John Watkins (formerly known as NufffRespect)
16. se wird smook frome the top and bottum just like the challenger
17. "Well. There's your problem." -  Adam Savage. lol
18. Play on slow motion, You see 2 to 3 orbs flying away from the rocket.
    UFO's shot it down!
19. NASA is full of shit
20. good job and just continue laughing at china made rocket,hhhahahahah