Lecture 2 | Quantum Entanglements, Part 1 (Stanford)
About | Information | History | Online | Facts | Discovery
Lecture 2 of Leonard Susskind's course concentrating on Quantum Entanglements (Part 1, Fall 2006). Recorded October 2, 2006 at Stanford University. This Stanford Continuing Studies course is the first of a three-quarter sequence of classes exploring the "quantum entanglements" in modern theoretical physics. Leonard Susskind is the Felix Bloch Professor of Physics at Stanford University. Complete playlist for the course: http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=A27CEA1B8B27EB67 Stanford Continuing Studies: http://continuingstudies.stanford.edu/ About Leonard Susskind: http://www.stanford.edu/dept/physics/people/faculty/sussk... Stanford University channel on YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/stanford
Comments
-
plug your ears LMFAO nice haha
-
thanks for making these available. LOVELY lecture series ^___^ hopefully we see a lot more of this type of content =] I particularly liked the walk-thru on matrices <3
-
He reminds me of George Castanza's father (or the King of Queens father).
-
Question: What happens if two entangled particles are put in the magnetic field? They should both point north but entanglement doesn't work that way right?
-
Question: The energy emitted by the electron when aligning itself to the magnetic field is either 0 or a particular value say E. Is it possible that electron is radiating some energy which we are not able to detect, as in something very small than E?
-
The electron vector can still be explained classically. if you imagine the vector being elastic not rigid, it bends up to a point, then if you force it further it yields the energy then it straighten itself up.
Another way is unless the electron is ready to emit the energy it continues the precession indefinitely. This is still quantum but it is imanginable -
earthquakes are sear motion exmple?
-
but spin up and spin down are not orthogonal at 1:05:48
-
how does north pole of electron point towards north pole of magnet at 18:21
-
Let's say we have N electrons (a very large number) and the energy required to flip an electron's spin from south to north is just "E". Then, if we prepare all the electrons to be in a "horizontal state" (90 degrees, so that in principle the probability of measuring each of the two possible states in the vertical direction is 50%), we turn the VERTICAL magnetic field and we measure the radiation energy, will we measure something close to N*E/2? Or will we see something else?
-
I love his lectures. my only problem is when he starts throwing math on his whiteboard I get lost very quick
-
i just fell asleep watching this, and i had a dream that i drew a picture of Richard Simmons on his white board as an equation and he got really pissed..... Is Richard Simmons the key to quantum entanglement ?
-
Some of the questions asked by the students in this class were ridiculous, it's like they didn't even listen to the lecture. This is pretty basic stuff, stop with the stupid questions and LISTEN!
-
"DIRTY DICE" I searched it in google thinking I would get a very interesting figures..and pictures..and boy I did..
-
This professor is the brain rewiring master i have never in my life learned so much in so little time.
-
if an electron is a perfect sphere , how or what does up or down even mean?
-
I love how at 1:13:10 the wrinkles on his wonderful forehead actually crank the encryption algorithm into rendering interference.
-
Explain why people are living after they are dead explain that science!
0m 0sLenght
1163Rating