Jupiter is an Electron - Scale Fractal Cosmology
About | Information | History | Online | Facts | Discovery
Explaining how the scale value between the cosmological and quantum scales, called "Reality Scale Constant S", was derived and the discovery of how Jupiter's mass equals an electron charge. Documented in an ebook titled "The General Principles of Reality A" an early work by Robert L. DeMelo (www.gpofr,com)
Comments
-
I have read notale's work to a degree and its very different than mine. first off only my framework produces the precise results in my work. technical details matter. also check robert oldershaw's work.
-
Sorry.....but any mass of any size or even two jupiters will attract.....its two like particles of the same charge that repell......
-
:) They are related... Correct you are sir... Hence various gravito-magnetic effects. So go good luck with the theory as we do need some form of relation b/w very big and very small... and stop making me understand... ignorance is bliss :)
-
I am afraid you are confused. As mainframexi says you can relate G waves to EM waves by simple scale manipulation, which means they are the same type of thing. There is no difference in them, as we've found with a larger scale the force gets weaker. I have valid reasons why, but with all particles I think it's farely obvious this is true, thus as string theory says, all the same stuff, different magnifying glass.
-
It is simple to create a curve in space-time that is in the other direction (that repels ordinary matter - as bump or mountain if you will) all you need is negative mass or negative energy... but I have not seen any or heard of any way to create it. Certainly gravitational waves exist but they are actually the ripples of space-time itself and not just a particular field (e.g. EM) And - this being a thought experiment - we can have as many identical massive bodies as needed to prove a point :)
-
Actually you can create negative interference waves which act as mountains in space time instead of dips, thus repelling. Gravity acts like a wave as every other thing in the universe does. Hope this doesn't turn into a physics argument about such an unrealistic subject as identically massive bodies.
-
nah... i change my mind... now that i think about it two identical non-rotating bodies would not emit any gravitational waves (appart from when they appear somehow)... it is the curvature of space-time itself that causes what looks like attraction to us... forget destructive interfering... they will always move towards each other with the familiar formula in play F=G*((m1m2)/distance) :) just got carried away a second ago...
-
:) You're suggesting the extremely improbable scenario of two absolutely identical massive bodies appearing at the same time* (as measured from exactly between them) amidst spacetime and generating gravitational waves that destructively interfere... while i agree that's interesting to say the least... i recon that the best case scenario is they stand still... not repel... That's my gut feeling on this issue :)
-
Though this video presents a very interesting derivation directly relating a gas-giant mass to an electron charge through scale, it is a very early work. Since then my results have grow considerably, and myself. My latest unpublished work is perhaps the best so far. Though this is very radical, I am very confident that this is on the right track because of the many results. This is why I'm not deterred.
-
I tried to send this previously, I don't know were it's gone. I was looking at a hypothesis by the (biologist) BenjaminSteber, who thought of a new way to look at dark matter. could you have a look at it. I can't find anything wrong with it, so I was wondering if you would. Reductio ad absurdum. Sorry for bothering you, but I think that this means something for scale frctal cosmology, and you could use it to build on your theory.
-
I know, I did not mean it in that way. I meant that it can solve anything that has so far been proven. If anything changes, string theory doesn't work.
-
@Daniel Lyndon pardon my limited replies. i'm on my mobile. your belief string can solve anything maybe misquided if you believe in scale fractal cosmology. string theory doesnt include invariant scale cosmology.
-
@Daniel Lyndon given the results derived and the simplicity of the framework along with my recent work, yes.
-
personally I think string theory solves any problem, but it still doesn't make it the right way to solve it, you know. I was merely checking to see if your mathematics are linked in any way to it.
-
Do you think that scale fractal cosmology is going in the right way here? I was just looking at an experiment, basic I know but fundamental; light refracts when it interacts with glass particles. This lenses it, are you sure that if these particles interact with, as you say, light that doesn't exist like that in their scale, objects in our scale couldn't interact with light on a higher scale. Do you think dark matter is just a photon that has mass in an even higher scale.
-
After deriving very precise and interesting data from my framework, along with seeing how less complex my work is, I am less inclined to think string theories are on the right track. Of course assess for yourself. First off, there are so many variations that the name string theory is misleadingly generalized. Do I believe in some of the approaches used in string theory are good? Yes.
-
In my framework, the density of quantum particles are extremely dense compared to macroscopic object which they constitute. This in a way makes quantum particles similar to black holes. The neutron was derived to be quantum versions of rock planets due to no charge, or virtually no charge, nature. This indicated neutrons are very small if macro mass translates to quantum mass (charge). I haven't focused closely on fractal nature of black holes.
-
Actually they do repel each other, but putting anything, even air between them would create a saddle warp between the gravitational ridge between these massive bodies, which if in any way asymmetrical to one, would cause the wave of one to overlap the other. this is one reason why the direction acceleration of a mass m into a mass M is invariant of m. Even the particles between the opposing grvitational waves would be counted here as factors of M as Mi Mj etc. NO system can be symmetrical 100%
-
You know if you have two black holes that have the same proportions to each other in pure mass (and mass alone- one 1/1836 or whatever times heavier than the other), they would orbit each other like an electron orbit's a proton. This was proven by observation. Your theory I think does say this, but I have two questions from this:1 Where does the neutron fit in, 2 what about the virtual fractal states inside the black holes' horizon? PS are you for string theory, or not?
-
Considering my previous reply, the lensing of light (bending) would then arise on the macroscopic scale from the mechanism of gravity involving mass, which is further intrinsically connected the fractal construct of space and matter including charge. Hope this helps. I don't have all the answers, but scale fractal cosmology the way I've defined it may help decipher them.
6m 36sLenght
41Rating