Impossible Quasars Shatter Theory | Space News

About | Information | History | Online | Facts | Discovery

1. Dr Tom Wilson knows his stuff well and does a good job explaining the conundrum regarding quasars. Dr Halton (Chip) Arp did some very good work on this topic as well. I thank Tom for his work and hope to see him again at the 2017 thunderbolts conference.
2. What happens when a UFO flies in front of an image of a distant object? It pulls the light and space time for a time nearer to other objects such as us . this is just another added notchnin favor of our celestialn sisters
3. I hope there will be an South Park episode of the Mandela Effect
4. Black holes. When I hear any of the prattle from BBHypothesis I get angry. How can such gibberish contine in our time of great discoveries. More and more are calling for the end of the rubbish science of dark matter and black holes. The only dark holes that stand in science are the vacuous holes in heads leading physics departments. Time to shut them down.
5. The old Standard model is falsified once again. The Electric Universe model is elegant, beautiful and predictive. And each new observation of electrical/plasma phenomena in the larger Universe adds to it's vigor as the model that best explains what we actually see.
6. "Certainty junkies" LOL THAT is the foundation of beliefs. Beliefs are the most dangerous of all man made inventions and the reason for genocidal wars. AND they crush real science.
7. At this years EU Conference Tom showed that the feeling of certainty could be duplicated by stimulation of certain parts of the primative human brain.
8. Love the EU and Thunderbolts work.
   
   Can you editors please begin including links to all of the articles and sources of quotes that you incorporate in your videos? If you show the clip, you must scan the original and post it online, or else - in the mind of a scientist - it may as well not exist.
   
   I find that most standard model acolytes have no tolerance for video presentation and require the text reference to satisfy their requirements for validity and reproducibility. On-screen references need to be reproduced in the video descriptions below for easy linking. Full text of the presentation monologues WITH links would be ideal.
   
   Also, I can't find any white paper or long-form experimental videos by DZ Parker or Billy Yelverton, which are bread and butter to EU rhetoric. I feel that their lab experiments concerning crater formation and dust storm phenomena are some of the strongest examples of EU theories in evidence and yet, both researchers and their work are enigmatic black holes in the EU academic universe. And yet their work should be the most easily reproducible.
   
   I would love to share white paper on their work with astronomers and cosmologists that I know. Very frustrating when I can't dialog in their language. They won't tolerated video.
9. How does electric universe explain Gravitational lensing? In the picture 11:24 you guys cite, that very picture shows how gravity effects light. It's clearly bending the light around massive objects, If gravity (in the einsteinium model) isn't real, what is causing the lensing?
10. It is amount of red shift that changes.because path of light from quasar encounters different space debris clouds as things drift around in space.
11. I have calculated the age of the universe to be in excess of several trillion years old. It doesn't seem at all reasonable that the universe is only a little older than the Earth. It's time to wake up.
12. I get your point overall.  Maintain an open-mind and keep in mind your own personal Ludeck Pachmann Moment (LPM).  In science it appears from your presentation one needs fewer HIQIs and more folks with a BDQ (Bullshit Detector Quotient) of about 130.
13. i watched a show about black holes on the bbc a few days ago... they claimed that the quasar effect was due to a galactic centre black hole "feeding" on a gas/dust cloud, and accelerating and compressing the cloud as it approaches the event horizon...  it seems to me perfectly reasonable that the arrival of such a cloud would cause a sudden flare up around the "hole", and that the "quasar" would dim fairly rapidly once the cloud was consumed...   I realise that the thunderbolts crowd doesn't generally accept that black holes exist, and wonder how you all would explain the observed rapid orbits of several stars around the empty space at the centre of the milky way?..   is it just the idea of a singularity that disturbs you? do you figure there's simply a superdense, supermassive, dark object there?
14. what I always thought was funny is that we are weightless in space yet the planets are not.
15. Black holes (dark matter and energy) gravitationally holding in Higgs bosons.Unified Certainty Theory.
    I'm not certain; star, sphere, e- probability pattern on the z-axis, S-shell add photon = hourglass and a ring or two, quasar, supernovea, galaxies, solar systems, atoms, e- probability patterns on the z-axis, P-shell, F-shell, D-shell subtract photon = sphere, star.
    Wondering if the shape of the big bang is half of the hourglass shape? Equal and opposite action. I'm certain, I'm guessing, the Universe is the F-shell. I heard the F-shell means life, two hourglass shapes opposing and two rings opposing, yin/yang.
    Scalable Universe.
16. This knowledge is very ancient.
17. http://www.gizmag.com/gravitational-waves-black-hole-light/41882/
18. wow that was a nice thx for sharing ;)
19. I just had my mind blown. Brilliant work! Thank you!