Imagining the Tenth Dimension part 1 of 2
About | Information | History | Online | Facts | Discovery
NEW VERSION! Imagining the Tenth Dimension - 2012 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zqeqW3g8N2Q (and thank you to Discovery Channel News for calling it a "Gotta See Video" http://news.discovery.com/space/imagining-the-tenth-dimension-gotta-see-videos-120816.html ) Want to know more? Try "Imagining the Third Dimension" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-D4swzK4sKk Check out the Scientific American article praising this project! http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/2011/08/22/has-science-gone-viral/ Watch Imagining the Fourth Dimension for more about this idea. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MN4KC_zlW4g This approach to visualizing the fifth dimension is now seeing support from scientists at Oxford: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o87TkFOR_Js You should follow this project on twitter: http://twitter.com/10thdim Watch the annotated version: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XjsgoXvnStY This is the first part of the animation illustrating the concepts found in chapter one of the book "Imagining the Tenth Dimension - a new way of thinking about time and space" by Rob Bryanton, from tenthdimension.com
Comments
-
dafuq?😐
-
Where do the concepts of dimensions even come from? I don't understand how we can just come to this notion or idea that dimensions are more than just descriptions or models. We seem to think that our human conceptualizations are inherently correct if they're logical. But even our logical interpretations of the universe are still human ideas, there's nothing there telling us that we're correct. Yet we continue evolving these ideas without considering the idea that our observations of dimensions could be leading us to the wrong ideas about what reality is. When considering the ''big picture'', is there really dimensions, aren't they all simply just the same thing; reality models? Descriptions of observations that we detect using our senses?
It just seems that we forget to realize that any description of the universe is inherently a fragmentation of the entirety. By dividing things into dimensions, like the 2nd dimension being an impossibly flat plane, aren't we just deducing this idea from the notion of what the 3rd dimension is? Like: ''oh hey, how about we just take the Z-axis out''. But what if the 2nd dimension isn't an impossibly flat plane, what if it's a liquid state of somethingness and the 3rd dimension is actually more than that? Basically what I'm trying to communicate is that our vantage point could be more than what we think it is, but because we see it a certain way, we're deducing other systems from it without realizing that the original conceptualization is false? -
I PERSONALLY doubt that the fourth dimension is time. Maybe the "flatlanders" think the third dimension is time, too. I bet the fourth dimension is just a direction we can't point in that's right under our noses. But don't trust me, I know pretty much nothing about quantum mechanics.
-
hi there cool vid got a new sub
-
I watched it so many times try to understand the things after 5th dimension and ... all it does is hurting my brain...
-
Hello sir that made this video.
I have a question.
Can i make a transalted to portguese version of this video and post it in my channel with the all the references?
Please respond me ASAP -
hard to grasp
-
a 2 dimentional creature sees in 1 dimension, a 3 dimensional creature sees in 2d.
-
how can a flatlander even see if there is no height? no matter can exist in 2D because even an atom has a height
-
Oh you guys are so smart. Yeah right! You're to busy thinking with half of your brain you don't even realize how fucking stupid you are. My fucking god!!
-
Some ppl have a really hard time thinking of theoryz!! in hypothetical ways. Come on, ppl! It's not meant to be taken so literally!
-
Those 'arrow shot from a boy'-like sound effects were so annoying xD
-
I
-
I watched this entire series' the summer before 9th grade.
-
Plot hole: what happens if a object is broken into 2 parts? Would there be 2 new 4d objects?
-
im here because of dr monster deadly bear vs leperchaun
-
In the end the Alpha is the Omega and vice versa.
-
I was 5 when this was uploaded
-
This is REALLY old
-
So basically the scientists just assumed that there are other dimensions, which they explain away with dots & lines. I always have questions when I'm being presented with info such as this one. When they say there's a dot, what does that even mean? How is a dot explained in this reality? When they say that in the 2nd dimension we are flat like cards, how flat exactly? Even the flatness of cards can be measured, some are thinker then others. Although I do believe that there are other realities/dimensions, I still don't know if scientists explained them correctly. For example, who's to say that time exists in other dimensions, or if aging processes exists in other dimensions. Or if there is matter in other dimensions like in our 3D world. Im always curious when it comes to these things.
6m 49sLenght
14036Rating