Imagining the Fourth Dimension

About | Information | History | Online | Facts | Discovery

1. Or do we enter the fourth dimension once we die? Death is something we cannot see but we are surrounded by it constantly? We cannot see what really happens to us when we die because its beyond our dimension? Perhaps whatever force or energy runs our body will continue on into the 4th dimension.
2. Go through a black hole and then you will experience the 4th dimension and die. Sometimes, science shouldn't stick its nose where it isn't welcomed. This is a warning from the future. DO NOT ATTEMPT TO RESEARCH THE 4TH DIMENSION OR YOU WILL NEVER SEE THE FACE OF THE EARTH ONCE THIS KNOWLEDGE IS WEAPONIZED
3. How can I perceive the 11th Dimension?
4. Don't you think 1D line (length) is something undefined as 1D line is represented by 2D multiple dots on same reference line. Neglecting any of dimension used to define dot(length, width) will neglect the existence of dot. 1D can be referred as single reference not length or width. This part is unclear to me...
   Second, the way we keep on increasing the existence of dimension isn't it possible for some greater number of dimensions or may be infinite D?
5. different dimensions dont exist
6. WE DONT KNOW 4D!!!!!! JFGWUBEKVNEKKODISJDOHHNGFJF....,.,.,?!.!?!.,,, SO LET US STOP EXPLAINING 4D !!!!!!!! ITS LIKE A 2D GUY EXPLAINING 3D!!!!!
7. the fourth dimension is the now, each frame of this third dimension that we observe in the second dimension is what it is. it's just a big blur being experienced a layer at a time, no other way to experience it all, only through what we've done, are doing, and will do.
8. There is no 4th dimension.
   
   Everything could be simply explained if there was an ether through where light waves.
   This is tested ONCE, by checking if light moved faster towards the east, and slower towards the west at noon.
   And since it didn't differ, we concluded that there couldn't be an ether, and thus light had to be made out of photons.
   
   The mistake:
   If there is an ether, it'll be gravitationally bounded, as we see in a light mill, and around stars.
   Therefor, the ether will fly with our earth, and thus light can wave at the speed of light in any direction on earth even when the earth itself is moving.
   
   Conclusion:
   Time isn't relative! Distance is relative (relative to the gravitational bounded ether)
   
   Sorry guys, no time travelling! Ooooooh!
   Science still interesting enough?
9. why is that universe is considering i this phenomena
10. So you mean.......... I am going to watch PewDiePie
11. we live in the fourth dimension but can't see it
    this is the time & space
    this is GOD
12. speak english
13. Flat Earth
14. you can't say you have experienced the 4th dimension by watching this video in our 3 dimensional universe on your 2 dimensional screen in you 1 dimensional brain
15. like on donnie Darko what He saw Everyones Path..
    remember they had like orb snakes coming out of Them..
16. my brain just got fuked up
17. J.
    
    You think in all-or-nothing terms. Something is either right or wrong, good or bad, perfect or a disaster. You tend to think in one extreme or the other, rather than seeing the characteristics of people and situations existing along a continuum. For example, you tend to think, "She is mean,” instead of, “She can sometimes be mean.”
    
    You think, and then act, in extremes. Have you ever acted on a sentiment like this, more than once?: "I had one cookie and screwed up my diet...I might as well eat them all.”
    
    You can’t trust others to do a task correctly, so you rarely delegate. Others may see you as a micro-manager or control-freak, but you see your actions as just wanting to get the job done right.
    
    You have demanding standards for yourself and others. You believe in always giving your best and you expect others to do the same. And you are scared to death of looking like a failure.
    
    You have trouble completing a project because you think there is always something more you can do to make it better. You obsess about sharing your book, project, meal, invitation, business card, website, article, or speech with others. You want to make sure your work is the best it can be before revealing it.
    
    You use the word “should” a lot. “I should do this," and “They should do that,” may be common phrases, both out loud and inside your head. You have certain “rules” you believe that you, and others, should follow. And when those rules aren't followed, you are not pleased.
    
    Your self-confidence depends on what you accomplish and how others react to you. You strive for excellence and need validation from others to feel good about your accomplishments. What’s more, once you have achieved a goal, you quickly move on to the next one.
    
    You tend to fixate on something you messed up. You may have done something right, but still focus instead on the one mistake you made.
    
    You procrastinate, or avoid situations where you think you might not excel. It may seem counterintuitive, but many people who procrastinate or avoid doing something are actually perfectionists: They're afraid they will fail. Their rationale is, “I might not be able to do it perfectly, so why bother at all?”
18. I appreciate the upload but I have major issues with the manner in which the makers of the video went about making it. It pretends to use sequential logic, but in reality, jumps all over the place with a "concept" here and an out of context quote there. For example, there is reference to the fact that dimensions are at right angles to one another, three or four times at least, but each time, it is mentioned, but also made to be an explanation, though it, in and of itself, is never actually explained. That's not just unnecessarily confusing, but also wrong; that is pretending to seem knowledgeable instead of actually guiding and teaching the audience, which then makes it condescending. Furthermore, there is reference, as aforementioned, to an Einstein quote, preceded by the idea that light has no speed. True. But what was not elaborated on, was that it has a velocity... A high school freshman knows that velocity is just speed with a direction, while a college physics student might even be so bold as to tell you, correctly mind you, that it is a speed with a direction in a specific time frame, or that is to say, point in time. So to say, "light has no speed" without further elaborating upon that is just placing a "factoid", a not wholly correct one at that, in a place where it doesn't belong, only to have the narrator not even make use of it beyond that whatsoever; genius. Want to heave the 4th dimension explained in a video that makes it seem like ASMR instead of kickass science? Watch the Carl Sagan version. It's better and not illogical and poorly portrayed trash.
19. So the 4th dimension Where Time is Spacial ?
20. absolutely stupid, makes no sense at all. just talking gibberish without actually saying anything.