How Life Began Origins Nova Neil Degrasse Tyson

About | Information | History | Online | Facts | Discovery

1. As for evolution, it is not a science. It is a philosophy. Like Christianity, it attempts to explain how we all have come into existence. The forward in the 1971 "Origins of Species" says, "...belief in evolution is exactly parallel to belief in special creation". You have to use faith in both cases because we are talking about events that are not here to TEST, STUDY, or OBSERVE. Without that ability it will never be a true science no matter how much its followers wish it to be. We can not test the past. We are left with two options concerning man's existence. Creation or evolution. (1) The very First Law of Thermodynamics states that energy can not be created or destroyed. So, where did energy come from? Evolutionist tell us that "all energy was condensed into a tiny speck....and the laws of physics can not account for this". They can not logically account for all the energy, yet want the status of being called a science. Evolution must by-pass this law and many more for it's hypothesis to even have a chance. Stating that the energy came from somewhere else is no different that telling us that life on earth was seeded from aliens. It doesn't answer the question. That alone is an logical fallacy that should end the discussion here but as we all know, they are the ones with the microphone and power today, so we will continue. (2) What about all the matter that exists in the universe? Where did it come from. Their answer. "The tiny speck began to expand. At three minutes atomic nuclei appeared". Evolutionist have no idea when the universe came into being, yet want us to believe they know what happened at the three minute mark? (3) In 2004 dozens of scientist spoke out against this hypothesis and stated in the the New Scientist Journal, "The big bang theory can boast no predictions that have been validated by observation". A few observations that discredit the big bang theory are, Uranus is tilted on its side, Venus rotates in the opposite direction, Mars atmosphere is too thin and Mercury too dense. The letter goes on to say, "The big bang relies on a growing number of never observed entities. In no other field of Physics would this continual recourse to new hypothetical factors be accepted". It's supported for one reason. Evolution is a philosophy, not a science. (4) It is now known that the Red Shift in starlight does not support the big bang. Second order Doppler effect, gravitation, and photon interaction cause this red shift. The bible states that God stretched out the heavens. They are stretched out. The appearance of expansion is due to these other phenomenons. (5) Also the BB does not account for the smooth MBR (microwave background radiation) observed. We now know that all stars give off MBR. (6) If the BB were true and it occurred 15 billion years ago, all matter would be evenly distributed in the universe. It's not. Instead galaxy's are tightly wound up and separated by huge voids. Evolutionist acknowledge this and call it the Wound up Dilemma. (7) The Law of Biogenisis, "Life only comes from living matter", is yet another law that must be asked to pause so this hypothesis deemed a science can be considered. They teach as a "fact" that all life came from non life, yet admit that NO traces of these events remain. I know of no discipline in science that gets away with this. But this is how the left operates. Experience will prove this to be true. A clue is by observing their reaction when you disagree with them. You become a flat earthier no matter how smart you are. (8) All living things require left handed amino acids and all right handed nucleotides. Just pause and consider how this could possibly have occurred by chance. Impossible right? Of course. In a natural setting, these molecules are 50% left and 50% right, yet they MUST be all left or all right!!. (9) It has been calculated that the odds of just a simple protein forming on its own, even given the left handed amino acids and 15 billion years would be 1X10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000. Probability and chance is a science. BTW that number is greater than all the known atoms in the universe. Also, the simplest cell requires 600 of these proteins!! (10) A bacterial flagellum is made up of over 40 different proteins and is irreducibly complex. How did that possibly come about? No answer. (11) To make matters worse for evolutionist is the fact that these flagellum are put together by many regulatory machines which are irreducibly complex as well. (12) The Urey-Miller experiment never produced life in the lab, only non living molecules that were so caustic that they would have killed any nearby life. Yet we are told that life was created in the lab. Think for a moment. If life actually had been created, wouldn't that be proof that intelligent design is needed to create life? Non the less, the experiment is like producing calcium in the lab and saying you created life. (14) DNA is the most complex molecule in the universe. It is estimated that the chances of it forming by chance would be 1x 10 to the TEN Billionth power.!!!!! You have a better chance of winning the lottery every week for 27,000 years in a row. (15) So WHY would anyone believe or teach something mathematically impossible? A Nobel Laureate, Dr. G. Wald from Harvard said, "I do not want to believe in God. Therefore, I choose to believe in something that is scientifically impossible". The simple fact that God exists is too much for many people to handle. Immediately they realize that there will be a judgement. Belief in evolution only pushes the can down the road, for God says in Revelation that, "every knee will bow and every tongue confess that Jesus is Lord". (16) Another quote from a HS science text book, "We do not believe in spontaneous generation, but since it was the first living thing, it had to come from non living chemicals". Think about it. We are being told that life arose on its own, on its own, when scientists with all the equipment and money to spare can not even produce it in a lab. (17) Science should and has been in the past, the search for truth. Evolution has a history froth with lies and deception. There are too many professors to count who have been fired because they disagreed with evolution. That's not science. That's a fanatical philosophical belief system. (18) There is no observable evidence of Darwinism occurring today, yet every day we see millions of biblical KINDS giving rise to their KINDS. Pause for a second and take that in. Everything so far mentioned is one logical fallacy after logical fallacy yet one is taught in schools and the other is not. In simple explanation its a spiritual battle for the minds of people. Jesus calls Satan a liar and deceiver. (19) Are you aware that new modern equipment has found C14 in EVERY layer of the Grand Canyon and in EQUAL amounts? That C14 has now been found in Diamonds which evolutionists believe are billions of years old? That soft tissue including blood cells, blood vessls and proteins have been found in dinosaur bones? This is all a big problem for old earthers because C14 decomposes completely in 30,000 years and DNA remains viable for only 2,500 years at 20 degrees centigrade. (20) In closing, though I have so much more that can be said, here are three FACTS that absolutely destroy evolution. ONE. All animals and plants posse DNA CODE BARRIERS which prevent them from ever giving rise to anything other than what they are. TWO. Micro Adaptations or put another way, the changes we see in varieties like dogs or humans or plants, result in the LOSS of genetic information. This is called GENE DEPLETION. In other word there is a weakening in the the gene pool. This is the exact opposite of what Darwinism needs. They need a method to add new and beneficial information to get new species, yet we observe the exact opposite. A weakening or wearing down of the gene pool. The second law of thermodynamics. Yes? THREE. Scientist today know of NO WAY for nature to add appreciable amounts of new and beneficial information to a gene pool. Everywhere we have witnessed information added, it has been done by a creature of intelligence.
2. Can we please disable comments i cant help myself reading them, and before post such arrogant stuff on them in videos like this
3. Why do they let stupid people in comment sections? There should at least be I.Q. tests for youtube sites like this. Folks, excuse me...if you didn't come in here wanting to sincerely digest science, there are plenty of other sites...there's one where a baby poops. There's one where a dog eats said poop. There are re-runs of Honey Boo Boo. Such a vast array of entertainment for you.
4. ok ok, loonies,  relax,,   no one is asking you to accept science,,,  don't worry about it,,, leave science and thought and logic to us,, we'll handle it,,,  go back to your snakes or speaking in tongues or anointed oil stuff,,   it's ok we understand ,,
5. hahahahaha
6. What a great example of pseudo - science.
   
   http://www.livescience.com/18565-life-building-blocks-chemical-evolution.html
   
   Just as species are thought to have evolved over time, the individual molecules that form the basis of life also likely developed in response to natural selection, scientists say.
   
   What is remarkable, that the author , Root-Bernstein, is mentioned as " In 1981, he was awarded a MacArthur Fellowship, commonly known as a "genius grant."
   
   Amazing. If a genius makes such nonsense claims, they must be true ??!!
7. if you subscribe to the matter x chance x time, then the only conclusion one can have is the is no meaning to life and morality and personal accountability is meaningless...and btw...science can not answer the most important qwestions...the whys...silly science.
8. This Neil Degrasse character is so insufferable. He talks of the origin of life as if he was in the planning committee himself. And its all lies because life did not 'evolve' but was created by an intelligence.
9. This is a lie! I've watched Family Guy, and I know life began when God and his roommate Chuggz were arm-wrestling when God borrowed Chuggz's lighter and lit his own fart
10. Science gives answer. Stop the fairytales holy book stuff. Only trust facts.
11. The imagination of atheitards full steam ahead .
12. God gave us life! Never forget that!
13. I'm not eight years old. I don't to have science presented in a Disney movie with childish special effects.... Stupid.....
14. What makes every snowflake to ever fall and ever to fall, hexagonal in shape.
     When a mineral deposit forms from materials losing depth and temperature below the surface of the Earth, how are some formed with such perfect symmetry etc?
     There is something making them do that. What is it?
15. "How Life Began", brought to you by the same junk science that predicted the polar icecaps would be melted by now.
16. If scientists cling to the view that life started naturally, yet cannot truly synthesize a living, dividing cell from abiotic molecules and compounds, they sadly wind up making an argument from incredulity.
    "I personally don't understand how life couldn't have arisen apart from natural processes, and while I have no evidence that life did start naturally, life is here today, so it must have started naturally."
17. oh boy , we think we wonder then we make it so
18. Shoutout to Ms. Banerjee's classroom. Its charlie~
19. I am here only because I have to complete a HW sheet based on this video.
20. What's that? You have about 300 years of scientific research that shows how life works? Well i have a 4000 year old book written by a guy in a cave and it says you're wrong!