Halton Arp and the Electric Universe | Space News

About | Information | History | Online | Facts | Discovery

1. A plasma focus looks like an iris..... 3:27
2. Arp's suggestion is in line with my 'The First Move Conundrum'
   
   Question: How does a body change from being at a state of rest to being in a state of motion in any given frame of reference?
   
   Considerations:
   Velocity equals distance over time.
   
   Acceleration equals change of velocity over time.
   
   Force equals mass times acceleration.
   
   To move a body from rest; distance the body has been moved from being at rest to being in motion has to be greater than zero but time to move from being at rest to being in motion must be equal to zero.
   
   Therefore in moving from At Rest to In Motion the acceleration equals infinity.
   
   Thus the Force required to move the body from a state of rest to a state of motion requires infinite acceleration therefore infinite force.
   
   Comment:
   Since the proposition that infinite force is required to move the body from rest to a state of motion does not conform with common experience the only alternative proposition that presents itself is that the mass of the body at rest is zero (thus requiring an infinitely small force to move it) and that as the body moves from a state of rest to the state of being in motion the mass of the body increases from zero to its observed mass over a subatomic distance (also over a very short time).
   
   Any better ideas?
   
   Thank you. Nigel Williams.
3. how galaxies are formed maybe how bio-matter was formed as well, its the exact same process but on a smaller scale
4. I can't help but feel modern cosmologist are like climate change scientists or modern economists. They're obsessed with mathematic computer models and ignore observation and reality. Why do establishment experts in any fields of study always seem to get things so wrong.
5. After listening carefully to Arp's explanation, I reckon he nailed it. Thankyou Mr Thornhill..
6. This theory is about to be acknowledged big time, finally. Its main propenents shall be remembered for all times and we most sincerely thank you for all your hard work and elucid explanations of cosmic phenomonon!!! 
7. This just further validates Walter Russell
8. Bodies are charged through their poles and radiate from their equators. Bodies appear to gain mass, because 'condensation' makes the invisible, visible.
9. RIP Halton Arp. Shame on the mainstream science media for failing to accurately report his true contribution to real science. 
10. The shape of infinity<2 at :35. Only half the Universe is shown, with the other half it would look like everything else in the Universe. Like quasars, nebulas, galaxies, e- orbitals probability patterns dz<2 and fz<2!
    Can you say "Dimensional"?
11. "... the youthfulness of newly created matter ..." Does the electric universe theory abide by the law of conservation of information? This particular part of the video confused me a little bit.
12. Thank-you for this video,very enlightening. The only question I have is that if the "Big Bang" did not happen,are the Scientists at C.E.R.N. just proving that a Big Bang can happen or have they created something else? What will happen when they try and split the supposed "Higgs Boson Particle"?
13. I am aware that this is not related to the video, but i find it important as well as intresting to the Electric Universe theory....
    I found this article on nasa.gov, it talks about a new cometary deep impact mission. This time they will use a harpoon instead of a impactor. I find it to be even more important in proving the electrical nature of comets than the Deep Impact Mission it self.
    Last time the electrical chock only damaged the impactor. Due to it beeing a harpoon linked to the proab it self this time, the electrical chock might pas, via a wire, on to the proab it self. If they do not protect vital technology and uses a voltage+ampere measuring device instead, it could be more than just a proof of the electric nature of comets. Then they might even get some samples back, but it wouldn't suprice me if they where to stuborn to do so.
    
    I might as well be wrong in my understanding of the electric comet, and if so it would be intresting to hear what you guys of the TBP have to say about it.
    Here is a link: http://www.nasa.gov/topics/solarsystem/features/comet-harpoon.html
14. I would like to share my opinion on this matter because I may hold some knowledge that may shed some light on these phenomena.  The red shift issue is not exactly an issue but rather an anomaly.  This concept of red shift pertains to the notion that we exist in a multidimensional universe based on a concept called cross collateral hybridization.  This means that we do not actually exist anywhere other than our own specific universe in relationship to our own specific surroundings.  This can we explained at a macro scale because we hold the keys to understanding how the universe works if we were to just watch how the planetary bodies react to one another.  The idea that red shift create our existence is not entirely true because if this were true, we would need a catalyst for exchanging energy between one planet to another.  I want to say that I know how this works in fact, but we must realize that we are dealing with a concept that must stretch our own understanding of how the universe operates in a multi dimensional format.  The electric universe model is entirely correct but the way the energy is transmitted is a bit different than expected.  I have a full model describing this and would love to share it with you all if you are interested.  
15. If you want to attend the memorial service for Dr. Halton Arp, here is the info from Marie-Helene Arp: memorial service on 31st January 2014 @ 13:30, Nordfriedhof, Ungererstrasse 130, 80805 Munich +49 89 370 039 820.  The information was submitted by an EU contributor.  Thank you!
16. The description of 'birth' brought me right to my 'womb' Exactly the same process!! We ARE The Universe.   Uni = One  Verse = Song "^_^"
17. Thank you 
18. FYI - "Seeing Red: Redshifts, Cosmology and Academic Science" is a mere $4.95 on Amazon!   I received my copy yesterday.   
19. Wow, this appears to support my theory that our earth puts on mass too. I think the earth emits mass from out of the center areas causing the planet to increase in size. I believe this may apply to many or all planets.
    More to the point, earth takes in energy and converts it to mass.
    This channel is about as good as it gets, a place where humans think!
20. Appreciate your work! Enjoy.