Flat Earth Debate ~ TheMorgile Responds to Globber's Arguments ~ 12/5/2016

About | Information | History | Online | Facts | Discovery

1. TheMorgile The drivel you are reading off your teleprompter around the 9:00 mark is, frankly, a bit beyond your understanding. Isn't it?
   Space is empty. It is indeed so empty that you can easily see stars hundreds of light years away. If space was full with any substantial matter, you could not see that far. But you can with the naked eye and if you use a telescope, you can see much, much further.
   The asteroid belt is - believe it or not - empty, too. There is not enough mass in there - at all! - to form an earth-sized planet.
2. great channel..been subbed for quite awhile..really appreciate your work morgile
3. How about water being attracted by water? Lol....
4. I have to thank you for all of the laughs your videos have given me. That somebody could be so completely idiotic is astounding.
5. you do not understand relative motion. the moon revolves around earth REGARDLESS of the sun. motion is relative. you're looking at it way out of context and just spitting out word salad. you just dont understand physics man. im sorry.
6. move on new subject ...unsubed
7. Fantastic video. Shared! Keep up the good work, brother! The earth is flat
8. Reading most comments here, no wonder why Trump was elected
9. this Mogile dude is fckn retarded..his logic is completely shot.he compared all other bodies in the universe to bowling pins in a bowlimg alley?ok lets go with that except there is no bowling alley...theres is ansolutely nothing except trillions and trillions of bowling pins....now what are you? lol
10. Morgile is unstoppable!
11. Even if the earth wasnt spinning and just traveling around the sun at 66k mph how would sand, water and us stay on it? it would be a flying rock. Imagine traveling in your car at 200 mph and you stepped out onto the roof!! How long do you think your going to stay on that roof?
12. rubbish
13. A more valid lable for us is "homoelectromagneticus"
14. Where is Bob Newhart when you need him.What he wouldn't give to narrate this work.😂
15. Imagine trying to introduce the heliocentric model, with particular regard with just the first ten minutes and the moon activity, to an audience in a theatre full of people aware of the reality of the plane. People in the audience would be having palpitations because of out of control laughter. There would be a need for red Cross people at every performance.
16. Gravity waves were not the FIRST proof of gravity. That's absurd, and not what I said or meant. You go out of your way to twist my arguments. They are just one more piece of evidence in a long chain of confirmations of gravity dating back about 500 years. It required advanced and enormously expensive equipment to discover the WAVES of gravity. Gravity was already a fact of course. And once again, the gravity waves were PREDICTED to exist 100 years before they could be detected - a great example of observation confirming theory.
17. Making predictions from consistent patterns, as some ancient civilizations were able to do, with some, but not all astronomical events, is NOT THE SAME thing as calculating obits with formulas of orbital mechanics. For example, we have not witnessed a single complete orbit of the dwarf planet Pluto, yet we can CALCULATE its future path accurately. New comets are sometimes discovered, and from observing their speed and direction, we can calculate exactly what day and time they will circle the sun and head back out to space. We know when near earth asteroids will make their closest approach to earth in the future, even if they have never been observed close to the earth. Patterns alone don't work for things like that.
18. 45:10 "Give me one example of mass being atttracted to mass, except the Cavendish experiment, because that's a pile of horseshit"
    
    So you want me to give examples, except for the actual scientifically proven examples because you have declared it is horseshit. Wow. Great way to argue there. Once again, your disbelief, misunderstanding, and confirmation bias, does not equal a refutation. It just shows your intellectual dishonesty. I really can't believe anyone takes you seriously when you say things like this. Have you disproven the Cavendish experiment?
    
    But as I have said before, in addition to the Cavendish experiment, you can watch the moons of Jupiter orbit the planet exactly as predicted by their masses and distances. So yes, there are really good demonstrations of the fact that gravity is a function of mass.
19. The stupidity of Gravity and the fact that it being one of the strongest forces in reality, in no way, shape or form can be measured or detected itself! Weight causes things to fall! People refuse to look at the facts of the Flat Earth out of the true fear of knowing that they will themselves fall into the category of those they now ridicule! Having to disregard all the theory and things they cannot understand in the Globe model for all the plain and super simple realities in the true Flat Earth model makes one very angry of the fact that they also have to disregard the go with the flow and me, me, me attitude and realize that they have been lied to on a great many plains!!
20. Lie,go in defense of Gravity claimed to have identified Gravitational waves from an incident occurring a Billion yrs ago when 2 black holes collided forming one gigantic black hole which is one theory trying to prove another! Complete lies and if any form of Gravity can be detected in waves, why can't any Gravity be detected or measured between Earth and the Moon!? It does not exist. Nor do black holes, well except for back in the day when Ali would make People laugh non stop and by constantly saying he was the greatest! Which was very true!