ET Spaceship passing close by 2 astronauts working outside S

About | Information | History | Online | Facts | Discovery

1. but to be of some danger the objects that most commonly pass the ISS the closest have the same general trajectory
2. false, i never replied to your comment to start a chain, i replied because you made it sound as though you thought they used stay vector to shut them up simply because of a UFO. i corrected you and i will again, no shit anything is a potential danger, but if the trajectory of an object does not meet or match up with the ISS trajectory then it is of no danger unless the trajectory changes.
3. Whatever. You only replied to my original comment to engage in a pissing contest which doesn't work as intelligent discussion. My two points remain true - any moving object at that speed is a potential danger, and this object is not on the same trajectory or velocity. Naturally they are going to be concerned. And I've been following the space program very closely since the Mercury program, and picked up a little knowledge myself along the way. Last word on my part. You can piss away. 
4. no shit, when i say it is relatively close to the orbital trajectory of the ISS i would usually think that someone with common sense would consider that the object would have a close Apogee and Perigee to that of the ISS. you see dipshit i know for a fact that i know more about this subject than you since i have been studying Astronomy and Astronautics for greater than 9 years.
5. Obviously you don't know as much as you think. First, the object is not in the same orbital trajectory as the ISS, which is evident by the fact that it's travelling in a different direction in the video. If it were at the same altitude as well as travelling in the same direction, and if it's velocity was unaffected by either inside (propulsion) or outside force, it would appear to be stationary relative to the ISS. Since it's not, it's a potential danger.
6. seriously? most of the manmade objects put into orbit are traveling at the same velocity if the object is extremely close to the orbital trajectory of the ISS, its basic rocket science bro something i know more than enough about, if anything has a slower orbital trajectory then it would have a larger orbit thus being father from the planet and ISS, the ISS is in LEO or low earth orbit, so anything in LEO is traveling at the same general speed.
7. No, everything is travelling at different speeds unless attached somehow to the space station. It obviously big enough to kill them and destroy the ISS with just a bump.
8. you dont say? you act like i dont know this, everything in orbit around or near the trajectory of the ISS is traveling at 17,500mph. but if what they are looking for is out of reach and a safe distance away then it is meaningless.
9. They are travelling at a speed of 17,500 miles per hour. Nothing floating around in space is meaningless. 
10. ya because every second of every EVA is planned for the astronauts, there is no time to just stop and look around for something meaningless, they need to finish what they were planned to do, and proceed to the next objective of the mission.
11. um... wrong?
12. I remember this one. You see how the brightness is cycling up and down? Well it was because of a problem with the camera. The cameras were image intensified and here the gain is repeatedly cycling up and down. The object only becomes visible at a certain gain, but the astronauts' eyes have nowhere near the same light sensitivity and would struggle to see it. Human eyes and intensified cameras should not be compared folks.
13. I'm seeing that 911, Katrina, now this conversation and cover up that my government uses alot of tactics in this way ie: "deny, deny, deny," or "make the witness look crazy" so as to hide the "truth, which is very powerful" to keep us so relaxed... That way we don't know what hit us during the chaos & disorder ie: 911, Katrina, ET's. I am sure now.
14. 3 possibilities! Either, Theyre strictly told by the govt to ignore these kinds of things, the video is fake, or... he just really doesnt give a damn!
15. There's more audio to this where someone at NASA shuts them up by saying "Stay vector", which basically means "Get off that subject".
16. Mike! common man.. look again! I can see it from earth! to your left. 9 O'clock. Never mind Mike... just keep playing around with your sizzle stick.
17. Why would he say " I don't know what you're talking about" without even looking? And if he had looked in response to the question, he would have obviously said " I don't see anything" or else "yeah, I don't know what that thing is". Unless of course he's scared shitless by something and pre-programmed by NASATY to deny any UFO sightings on the spot. In any case it's pure out n' out NASA bullshit ( yet again)
18. I don't see what you're talking about! *classic*