Einstein's gravity explained

About | Information | History | Online | Facts | Discovery

1. He stops the ball before it drops still. let the ball keep going then.
2. If Gravity is interconnected with any other phenomenon it is Electromagnetism. If Newton was born after Coulomb, Newton himself could have explained the mechanism of gravity. 
   What I feel is, we have been deserted in a thick jungle of unnecessarily created theories and paradoxes paying for the penalty of being too conservative to follow centuries old vague analytical foot prints of late scientists. We have marched a far distance away from the Reality and something could be comprehended by human beings must be the Reality. Aren’t we struggling to solve all manmade paradoxes?
   Sir Isaac Newton was the greatest among practical scientists but he explained only the physical parameters of the phenomenon called Gravity. The phenomenon is not completely explained whereas the ‘Mechanism behind Gravity’, “how Gravity attracts things”, is not clearly explained. The scientists of the mediator period after Newton, have made it more complicated making a paradox out of gravity by their philosophic definitions which could never be proven practically or mathematically. 
   I firmly believe Scientists of the 21st century can solve this paradox unless they really want to conserve it as a paradox leaving for the future generations to solve. 
   
   A Physical Science Students of logical thinking and open mind should ask only two questions; 
   1. Why Gravity does only attract things and why it doesn't repel, just like in electro magnetism? 
   2. Why do Gravity attract only 'Atomic mass' and why not other masses such as light , heat, photon, electron & solar wind etc? 
   
   Before answering above questions we have to clarify what are the ‘Three Fundamental Space Matter in this world?' Solids, Liquids and Gasses must be the sure answer from a student of junior secondary level. But we know that they are only the three phases of the same ‘Atomic Matter’. Then what are electron's, light, heat and solar wind etc? Do not they possess a Mass? 
   Perhaps they are tougher and stronger than ‘Atomic Mass’. How about a lightning stroke which can break even a rock boulder in to pieces? A dynamic potential flow of electrons don’t respond at all for the so mighty force of Gravity. That is how this special category of Matter behaves and it has to be recognized as 'Energy Matter' in the world. ‘Solar wind’ too belongs to that category because it is made up of weakly charged energy particles emitted from Sun and if it responds for gravity, it could have accumulated around Sun without travelling so far towards us in the solar system.  
   Then what is the third category of Matter? It is the 'Space Medium Matter'. The space is densely filled with this invisible static matter and that has a Density and a Pressure too which can be derived  mathematically. (pl ref ‘Space Dynamics-V1/2009-for mathematical derivations).   Let’s then summarize the three fundamental space matter such as;
   1. Atomic Matter-(everybody knows it as internal rotary organizations where electron clouds are vigorously orbiting the nucleus)  
   2. Energy Matter-(line projection of energy particles- But we cannot identify them when speed is lost. Have you ever seen an electron at a stop?)
   3. Medium Matter-(densely packed particles of speed lost static Energy Matter).  
   
   Now only the Mechanism of Gravity can be analyzed because the different behavior of ‘Energy Waves’ and ‘Energy Rays’ could never be distinguished until the Space Medium is well defined. Energy rays such as light, heat X-ray etc. don’t need a medium to travel because they are line projection of energy particles like photons. 
   But waves such as, natural sounds, electromagnetic sound Radio (FM or AM), TV, Radar etc need a medium to travel. Natural sounds simply need atmospheric medium to transmit but other electromagnetic waves essentially need the free ‘Space Medium’ to transmit the signal. ‘Pressure’ is the most influential parameter of any medium for efficiency in transmitting energy waves.
   
   Gravity too is born due to a FM wave of high frequency and of the same speed of light. (pl ref ‘Space Dynamics-V2/2009-for frequency and speed analysis of the gravitational wave)
    
   Put a fly in to calm water and you would observe tiny waves generating round and round. That is how atomic masses produce gravitational waves in the space medium due to vibration. A single atom can be considered as a massive rotary organization in which electrons are orbiting vigorously round the nucleus. Students know any rotary machine in the world make a vibration. You would be astonished if you could hear the sound and vibration of the atoms in your own body. It has to be comprehended as a vigorously dynamic steel factory. 
   
   So an atom vibrates and a bigger collection of atoms makes a bigger vibration to transmit a stronger wave through the space medium. That is how gravitational waves are born but how on earth it can attract another mass isn’t that a magic? 
   
   When the waves strike upon any secondary atom in the field, the rotating electron cloud is a bit shifted closer to the nucleus from the direction at where the waves strike from. Thence the balance of Coulomb's electromagnetic force between negatively charged electron cloud and the positively charged nucleus is gone. The force from the side of wave strike becomes bigger because the distance to nucleus in that direction is decreased. The resultant unbalance force makes the atom move gradually towards the gravity source and Sir Isaac Newton (1643-1727) has explain rest of the phenomenon explicitly.   
   
   The other most important thing that scientists of the modern era have got to pay attention is the deviation of gravitational fields when the source is in motion. Dynamic behavior of gravitational fields has vaguely addressed by some theories but not acceptably explained yet up to the 21st century. Only the static gravitation was addressed in the Newtonian Mechanics. But just imagine, Sun is rotating and its gravitational field is not static at all. 
   
   Gravitational field is deviated when the gravity source is rotating and the ‘Theory of Gravity Deviation /2009’ explains how a lateral force component, recognized as ‘Orbital Motive Force’, is induced upon planets in the solar system to make them orbit in the same direction of Sun’s rotation. Precession of planets and all the other related paradoxes can be explained if the Scientists of the century are prepared to accept ‘Gravity Deviation’.(pl ref ‘Precession in Orbital Motion of Planets’/2013).   
   
   However ultimately the credit of ‘Gravity’ has to be shared between Newton and Coulomb as well because the Mechanism of a so mysterious magical force could never be explained by any of us unless the marvelous finding, ‘Electromagnetism’ was introduced to the world by Coulomb (1785). 
   
   Besides that “Mass of Matter” could never be explained by any of us unless the ‘Theory of Energy Conservation’ is produced by the great scientist Albert Einstein (1879-1955). It is my personal opinion that, such a brilliant concept ‘curvature of space dimension with time’ which describes the ‘Space Dynamics along the 4th Dimension’ should not have been used to explain Gravity.      
3. Einstein did error with this theory, Newtoon is much closer to the true. Gravity and time has nothing to do together.
4. i have question...this sheet is still 2d,  but space is 3d...so to demonstrate this you should put this object into  3d mass or something? would it still be the same effect? would it still bend ? please explain i want to understand but i dont :(
5. bushit. if space is  = nothing/emptiness . then what is the sun actually  bending ?  
6. and still space/time it's a confused statement, space means emptiness, space/time it's the fabric, call it energy or vibrations.  
7. Yeah.. but next I want to know, what pulls the big planets so they can bend the space time. Why does it bend. Why doesn't the space just be unbendable? And is there something under the space. How can it bend there. And how does the force work that makes the big planets actually bend the space??? I get, that in test, the vacuum is bend by that stick. But how does it happen in nature?
   
   How can the gravity make the planet bend the space, if bending of the space is what makes the whole gravity?? Its like chiken and egg problem. If gravity is basically the effect of bent space, then what force is the one that happens before the space is bent. What is the force that makes planet weight to bent space.
8. Yes but , Surely the result of this experiment will be the ball ending up in the middle? Which it would have done if he hadn't stopped it. Mars is much smaller than the Earth but further from the sun, I don't understand how it doesn't move further away?
9. Here is a new fresh idea in science that could hold some answers watch?v=Uwn5otNu0t0
10. How about this one about the goldfish interpretation. See it on youtube or vimeo
11. 0:52 It's only one layer of space and it gets bigger. Therefor it takes inmore room. Fill in every layer of space and you find that there isnt any roo for all the stretched out space by matter. Its simply wrong! See the Goldfish interpretation on youtube. It explaines it all.
12. Excellent
13. one of the few good videos on youtube
14. fool.
15. you just put this gravity model crap in a nut shell....they are morons that cant see the 3D picture and how it would not work...also they are using gravity in a model for gravity..stupid beyond belief .
16. why, are you planning to teach this rubbish to kids ?
17. This practical is fooled/failed by the person who is performing it himself. If you through the ball exact towards the center of the "sun" it will never revolve around it, it will always go on a straight path. You are intentionally throwing the ball in a different direction (offset from center) and thus the ball's path is curved towards the"sun". Why? because of sun's "GRAVITATIONAL " force. Not because of the fabrics's push.
18. Great video of a "membrane" type of gravity well. Wonder if this is a standard type of demonstration device and where it might be available? Does anybody out there possibly know?. 
19. NONE OF THE PLANETS OF THE SOLAR SYSTEM GOES UNDER THE SUN FOLLOWING THE HOLE CAUSED BY THE CUREVED SPACE TIME.
20. The curved space time is like a hole. Our planet earth never falls down in this hole and goes under the sun!!!!!!!!!!