Does God Exist? William Lane Craig vs Christopher Hitchens
About | Information | History | Online | Facts | Discovery
Does God Exist? William Lane Craig vs Christopher Hitchens (Record Date - 2009) WC makes two contentions: – there are no good arguments for atheism – there are good arguments for theism 1. cosmological argument – an actually infinite number of past events is impossible – number of past events must be finite – therefore universe has a beginning – the beginning of the universe is confirmed by science – universe began to exist from nothing 2. teleological argument – fine-tuned constants and ratios – constants not determined by laws of nature – also, there are arbitrary quantities – constants and quantities are in narrow range of life-permitting values – an example: if the weak force were different by 1 in 10 to the 100, then no life – there are 3 explanations: physical law or chance or design 3. moral argument – objective moral values are values that exist regardless of what humans think – objective values are not personal preferences – objective values are not evolved standards that cultures have depending on time and place 4. argument from resurrection miracle – resurrection implies miracle – miracle implies God – 3 minimal facts pass the historical tests (early attestation, eyewitness testimony, multiple attestation, etc.) – minimal fact 1: empty tomb – minimal fact 2: appearances – minimal fact 3: early belief in the resurrection – jewish theology prohibits a dying messiah – messiah is not supposed to die – jewish theology has a general resurrection of everybody, there is not supposed to be a resurrection of one person 5. properly basic belief in god – religious experience is properly basic – it’s just like the belief in the external world, grounded in experience – in the absence of defeaters, those experiences are valid Conclusion: What CH must do: – destroy all 5 of WC’s arguments – erect his own case in its place CH opening speech: 1. evolution disproves biological design argument – evolution disproves paley’s argument for a watchmaker 2. god wouldn’t have done it that way – god wouldn’t have waited that long before the incarnation – mass extinction and death before Jesus – god wouldn’t have allowed humans to have almost gone extinct a while back in africa – why insist that this wasteful and incompetent history of life is for us, that’s a bad design – the universe is so vast, why would god need so much space, that’s a bad design – there is too much destruction in the universe, like exploding stars – that’s a bad design – the heat death of the universe is a bad design – too many of the other planets don’t support life, that’s a bad design – the sun is going to become a red giant and incinerate us, that’s a bad design 3. hitchens’ burden of proof – there is no good reason that supports the existence of god – all arguments for god can be explained without god – atheists can’t prove there is no god – but they can prove there is no good argument for god 4. craig’s scientific arguments don’t go far enough, they only prove deism, not theism – the scientific arguments don’t prove prayer works – the scientific arguments don’t prove specific moral teachings of christianity 5. if the laws of physics are so great then miracles shouldn’t be allowed – good laws and miracles seem to be in contradiction 6. extraordinary claims need extraordinary evidence – none of craig’s evidence was extraordinary 7. science can change, so craig can’t use the progress of science – it’s too early for craig to use the big bang and fine-tuning – the big bang and fine-tuning evidences are too new – they could be overturned by the progress of science Response to the big bang and fine-tuning arguments: – was there pre-existing material? – who designed the designer? WC first rebuttal: Reiterates his 2 basic contentions CH agrees that there is no good argument for atheism – then all you’ve got is agnosticism – because CH did not claim to know there is no God – and he gave no arguments that there is no God CH’s argument that god is wasteful CH concluding speech HITCHENS YIELDS HIS ENTIRE CONCLUDING SPEECH! Some of the other William lane Craig Videos - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f_vO6H-iIvM https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qfbvr0ngsnA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qb1-F_UEtS4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xutukF93JwM https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oIBJ1wVqCeU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_NAOc6ctw1s Some of the other Christopher Hitchens Videos - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uqjfGFHes0w https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=crmBTgGbla4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sD0B-X9LJjs https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xl84z8JwTSA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mMraxhd9Z9Q https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jw3dDbc1BHE
Comments
-
I cannot believe that in 2016 there are still those who believe in God!
-
Hitchens, excuse my language, is a fucking idiot. This guy seriously didn't present any actual information or reasons that could hold down his case..all he kept doing was using some twisted anti-religious rhetoric..which I must say kept trying soo hard to turn this debate into religion vs whatever the heck he was trying to defend cause at the end there even he seemed like he didn't know wtf he actually believed in. And people look up to this guy?..smh.
-
Hitchens didn't even deserve to be considered as having an opinion. He was just yelling at the current false Vatican in Rome (1958-on going) instead of addressing the points of the debate. Should've been kicked out in 5 minutes for not making sense.
But yet, since we live in an atheist world, stupid liars of that kind are even respected by tollerant alleged “Christians” (probably a protestant heretic) like William Lane Craig. Which by the way won the debate with his legit points opposed to Hitchens' void.
This is why this world is of the Devil and Jesus promised to destroy and replace it. -
The Hitch starts at 26:12.
-
it's hard to keep listening to Hutchins when so much he said to begin was false. Including that the church taught we are at the center of the universe, making it sound like Andromeda is gonna destroy us when even bible prophecy doesn't go on for another 2 billion years, even say that God is angry, he's upset we are spiritual blind not that we sinned.
Hutchins has based his argument upon main stream INCORRECT biblical info -
Wow! Hitchens gave this dude an epic ass kicking, lol!
-
it's amazing how many people still identify as theists. Even after recognizing that their beliefs solely rely on faith.
Indoctrination is a bitch. -
He says not to take creation literally ,Ken Ham says to take it literally . Half christians dont believe in evolution just because of their holy book .
-
The pope always prays for this and that . For victims or earthquakes and flood yet nothing happens . If god exists and he doesnt answer prayers of the pope (who is his greatest follower ) then he surely wouldnt answer mine and if he doesnt answer mine then is there any reason to pray to him ? All of this assuming that he exists in the first place which is very very shady .
-
Hitchens is a good speaker but damn he uses a lot of big words and so fast that I have a hard time grasping everything he says .
-
Does God Exist?
Well, if he does we all (and most of all the religious fraternity) better watch out, for evident,
he is an extremely NASTY PIECE OF WORK . -
I spare you these 2 hours and skip to the answer for you:
nope -
you good enough to go to Heaven when you die? 10 out of 10 will die; you could die tonight! How many lies have you told in your life? Ever stolen? Ever looked at a person with lust? Ever used God's name in vain? If so, then God sees you as a lying, thieving, blasphemous, adulterer at heart and you must face God on judgment day; Revelation 21v8 says; "All liars will have their part in the lake of fire" no thief, adulterer or blasphemer will enter; you broke God's laws, but Jesus paid your fine; (IF) you repent and trust in Him alone, God will grant you everlasting life; (IF) you refuse, then you must pay your fine yourself in eternal torments...
-
Are you Loving enough to enter heaven? Have you always loved and obeyed God with all your heart, mind, soul, and strength? Have you always Loved your neighbor and enemies selflessly, thinking nothing of yourself? Have you always put God and others before yourself in every thought, word, and deed? Do you deny yourself and renounce everything that you are in order to esteem God above everyone & everything? Would you be willing to sacrifice your life that God may have all the glory even if you still were rejected and abandoned at the end? If this is not your heart; then you have not enough Love to be accepted into Heaven; "He that Loves not (selflessly) knows not God for God IS (sacrificial and selfless) Love"
-
Shit the bed. Craig's style is the oratorical equivalent of death by power point.
-
-
What a B.S this William Lane Craig is LOl This Chritian don't argue with thousand people died for century under this non scense religion he is talking like a Scientist LOL
god doesn't Exist period. it's a Man made to control People, and killing people. Chritopher Hitchens 100% right -
Very very logical arguments in the book I found recently about the existence of God/Creator. Really want people to try argue back to this because I feel like I'm forced to believe the existence of God after reading this.... https://www.amazon.co.uk/Proof-God-Sigru-Falki-ebook/dp/B01I3F1UOI/ref=sr_1_1?s=digital-text&ie=UTF8&qid=1473845952&sr=1-1&keywords=a+proof+of+god
-
hitchens looks amateurish
-
And WLC's position... If magic. then magic, because magic.
0m 0sLenght
128Rating