Did A UFO Blow Up SpaceX? Watch The Slow Motion Footage

About | Information | History | Online | Facts | Discovery

1. Outer Space Does Not Exist.
2. Cette explosion est trop violente pour ce soit une simple fuite ! La dessus on est d'accord !!! ...
3. The lens flare reminds me of rockets being hit by a lazer say from a missile defense system. Those vids are too on utube.
   yep that initial ignition wasy way brighter than the fuel explosion
   because it may have been a high intensity lazer beam. Fired into the the
   third stage fuel filler while fuel was being delivered.
4. THis video has an error mssg that says u made an editing mistake deleting half the vid. Is this correct that u would not upl;oad a video with half of it blacked out?
5. facebook spy sat? great job ET!
6. The reported news of explosion during preparation of launching of space rocket at Cape Canaveral , Florida on 1 September 2016 looks to have obviously sent worry signals to NASA as also US. While the precise causes of the explosion are not known , it can be gathered that handling of fire during preparations could possibly have something to do with the explosion. In this connection , this Vedic astrology writer had , as early as last year on 15 October 2015 , sought to alert US by saying as – “ It looks that vulnerable regions whose name begins with any of letters L , C , N , T , U , could likely keep prepared at a short notice , particularly during last ten days of April or after in relation to fire , volcano eruption, and the like natural disasters. Use or storage of chemicals or radiation material or nuclear stuff may be done with utmost care”. This alert was a part of the article – “ Astrological Probable Alerts for US in Year 2016” - published last year on 15 October 2015 in online magazine thesop.org. A reading of the alert may suggest that while it is not exactly precise , still it has some hints which could probably have been imaginatively meaningful.
7. WATCH @ 10:40 https://youtu.be/6x71cHDTRKc BUCKY BALL EST. MACH 60
8. dear Mr Zuckerberg.......you've spent a lot of money trying to bring to Africa the enlightenment that the internet has brought to most of the people on the planet. don't you realise how much harder it is to manipulate people when they have access to truth and knowledge...........Other people have worked so hard to corrupt the governments in Africa, keep the people ignorant and cause chaos so that they can steal their resources........use their votes in the UN etc...etc......NOW YOU'RE TRYING TO RUIN IT ALL.........all that hard work gone..............what did you think they would do?????????        BUT PLEASE DONT GIVE UP..............AFRICA IS WORTH IT.............
9. there is no such thing as ufo s anything alien looking is a demon one of the many fallen angels, and you are being deceived by satan himself!
10. ★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★✰✯✯✯ Слава Великой России! ✯✯✯✰★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★
    🎆💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪😊😉😍😉😊💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪🎆
    👏✊✊✊✊✊✊✊✊✊✊✊✊✊✊✊✊✊✊✊✊✊✊✌✌✌✌✌✌😂✌✌✌✌✌✌✊✊✊✊✊✊✊✊✊✊✊✊✊✊✊✊✊✊✊✊✊✊✊✊✊👏
    ❤👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👌👌👌👌👌👌👌♕👑♕👌👌👌👌👌👌👌👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍❤
11. This video asks many questions, but it answers the question "whatever happened to Robot Jones". (also, the object in question is not a UFO, its a standard issue B1RD)
12. Build it again.. If that happens.. Well ..you know
13. your watching a bird fly past the camera between the camera and the rocket...you can see it flap its wings...the reason its going by so fast is because its closer to the camera than the rocket...you people need to unplug for a bit
14. Looks like a droid of the sort,I think UFO's are much bigger
15. UFO hahaha
16. Дибилы это муха!
17. So if it was something that came from another planet and cared about this crap and could blow this thing up BUT it had to fly over it to do it! Come onnnnnn...
18. A negative intentions are disabled by positive forces like Ashtar Command for our and their safety.
19. This link is slowed down to 1/250 speed same camera view shows two (2) objects.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HXqG-R8O39g
    This is a national security issue and needs to be treated with the highest priorities possible, not discarded as some fluke. A comprehensive investigation is in-order complete with regard to every detail no matter how minuscule.
    
    The camera is at a great distance and zoomed in. So a bird that fly's in-between would seem to be moving very fast. I do not think it is a bird or bug by the distance, speed, size, and way that it is flying. There are 16 frames that the "first" object is captured by the camera. At 0:37 the 12th frame that it is captured, the light form the blast reflects off the top right part of it. This flash of light shows that it is round and also shows that it is larger than a bird. Three frames later at 0:40 it looks as if it is behind the top left corner of the left tower. All 3 towers are at a less distance than the rocket so it appears to have flown between those towers and the rocket. Again giving it a larger than a bird appearance.
    
    @ 0:47 another "second" object comes from the lower left side of the screen and fly's behind the left tower, up to, and into the blast as if it had the same aim point as the blast. Then flies out of the blast area to continue the up and away angle. This would be consistent with a double tap or simultaneous attack from two different directions. These two Anomalies are above suspicion as they both occurred at the moment of the catastrophic blast.
    
    I would have to speculate since neither of the two Anomaly projectiles made physical contact with the rocket tends to rule out kinetic weapons. Perhaps the bright flash of light could be the source of ignition, exploiting a vulnerability while in the fueling process is more plausible. This was a coordinated effort accomplished by highly skilled people equipped with sophisticated state-of-the-art stand-off weapons. This is a national security issue, while many will speculate that it could be some kind of "in-side" job...
    
    These anomaly projectiles are not traveling super sonic keeping them from breaking the sound barrier and that is why the camera captured them as well as it did. The first one had a flat trajectory with no trail or sign of propulsion as it flew. The second one flew much like the first only the trajectory was higher and that angle indicates it's origination was not far from the launch pad.
    
    I would not know the radar coverage of a NASA facility (Q37) as the radar signatures would be of great interest. Both of those objects would either self-destruct or would need to be recovered if indeed they are a type of a weapon. Radar would assist in determining the point of origin and the end of their path. Maybe a clue could be found at those points...