David Talbott: Exposing the Myths of "Settled Science" | NPA19
About | Information | History | Online | Facts | Discovery
Want to network with other like-minded individuals? Join us at EU2015 Conference: Paths of Discovery, June 25-29, Sheraton Phoenix Downtown. Start your journey here: https://www.thunderbolts.info/wp/2015/01/31/eu2015-home-page/ Is it possible that the foundational assumptions of the theoretical sciences all express a common misunderstanding? From cosmology, the "queen of the sciences," a core dogma of the 20th century filtered down through every discipline, constraining our ideas about galaxy and star formation and ultimately (from the same underlying assumptions) all of the space sciences, infecting our views of earth history and even our sense of what it means to be human. The core dogma was the idea that gravity alone, seen through the lens of general relativity, rules the cosmos. Dispelling this most common misconception has become the essential requirement for scientific progress, since all of the new evidence makes clear that we live in an Electric Universe. David Talbott presented this talk at the annual meeting of the Natural Philosophy Alliance, University of Maryland, July 10-13, 2013. Part Two of the talk will be given at the upcoming The Thunderbolts Project(TM) conference (Electric Universe 2014: All About Evidence) March 20-24, in Albuquerque, New Mexico. See www.thunderbolts.info for announcement in September 2013. Other Electric Universe presentations at the NPA20 conference included Wallace Thornhill's talk "The Interdisciplinary Story of the Electric Unvierse" at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xxaP91FdijU&feature=c4-overview&list=UUvHqXK_Hz79tjqRosK4tWYA Also posted from the NPA20 conference is the talk of Dr. Gerald Pollack, "The Fourth Phase of Water" at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q33Ky... Subscribe to Thunderbolts Update newsletter: http://eepurl.com/ETy41 Thunderbolts Project Home: http://www.thunderbolts.info Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/thunderboltsproject Picture of the Day: http://www.thunderbolts.info/wp/daily-tpod/ Electric Universe (Wal Thornhill): http://www.holoscience.com/wp/ Essential Guide to the Electric Universe: http://www.thunderbolts.info/wp/eg-contents/
Comments
-
TIME🌐🌏🌏👀👀👀👾🕝🕑🕐🕜🌠🌠🌠
-
a few points for you to ponder on the nucular Fusion group are not receiving a check from your organization yet therefore they don't believe you I promise this and the other point the waiting for you to die so they can steal your idea
-
Anybody with background in electronics and electricity can relate to this. It is like seeing and immediately knowing that all this makes real sense contrary to the explanations given by mainstream science, on a thermonuclear Sun and stars and the gravitational action of our universe. It is time that new thinking and explanations on older science arises, so that we can move ahead in real knowledge and wisdom. For now the human knowledge in astronomy is marking time and has come to an halt.
-
WOW!
-
I am absolutely convinced that electromagnetism plays a much more important role on planetary, solar, galactic, and cosmic scales than we currently understand or admit.
-
The problem that science never tackles is that our view of the universe and the so-called physical reality is through our consciousness and that changes over time and from culture to culture. In fact, we have recently gone through a consciousness evolution (the Maya were right) and even now we are now not seeing or experiencing 'the physical reality' the way we were before (probably as good an explanation as any for all the insanity and polarizing we are experiencing now).
-
CO2 drives global warming?
-
A constant flow of electricity on the sun causes the plasma. Where there are large areas of either positive or negative, there is no current flow and no or very little plasma.
-
If what he said is so, then what's powering the Sun?
-
Brilliant. I agree that math cannot be disconnected from the evidence. That leads to castles in the air and CAF, computer-aided fantasies.
-
If there are any who think that most of science is settled, watch this! Dave Talbott does a great job in showing the many points in science is not only not settled but sadly misinterpreted by scientist`s who are going by what they were taught, and not what makes sense, or is observable. Thank you thunderbolts and Dave Talbott for the work your doing! The students of the future owe all of you a great thanks.
-
The sience is settled, the sience is settled, is everything I hear in any argument I participate in regarding topics on "global warming" and the universe itself......beeing a craftsman it seems I am not alowed to educate myself outside main stream educational facilitys. Refering to this kind of information from EU, only results in mocking and ridiculing of my person.......if it is on youtube it must be nonsense seems to be the only fact ??
-
Ok, I have to ask, where does the rocky matter come from in the solar system? If the sun formed from a concentration of plasma, did it then throw off the heavier materials? The age of the earth is very nearly the age of the sun, so all of the material that the planets are made of seems to have been created at the same time, roughly, as the sun lit up or shortly thereafter. Is this true of all heavier material? Don't nova eject lots of material into the plasma stream that they are a part of? Would that material tend to clump up into masses and become, in some cases, the cores of new stars?
These are honest questions that this presentation brought to mind. Anyone who knows the subject feel free to help me here. :-) -
Is there a theory in the EU that the Earth was at one time the focal point of an electric system similar to the one powering the sun and retains a hot molten inertia as a legacy?
-
Great talk, as usual.
I thought I'd mention, though, that at 26:02, the presentation says, "FACT: 1999 the solar wind stopped altogether for two days," but this is a bit of an exaggeration. It's absolutely true that it decreased significantly -- in fact, it's still the greatest decrease on record, and it begs the question, "If there's constant fusion going on in the core and that the outer solar phenomena are the end results of said fusion, then why would that fusion have stopped or slowed so dramatically for a couple of days?" -- but it's not accurate to say that the solar wind "stopped altogether." Basically, I'm nitpicking here, since the central question remains the same, but with challenges to mainstream scientism, it's vital that such exaggerations be avoided as much as possible, because apologists for scientism will often utilize a logical fallacy (whose precise name escapes me at the moment) wherein they attack one minor point in an argument and then use that as a basis for ignoring the rest of the argument. It's a kind of misdirection tactic, not unlike those employed by magicians (and is it any wonder that a lot of magicians, mentalists, etc., become "debunkers" and use these sorts of tactics to obfuscate evidence for things that go outside of a purely material worldview?), and unfortunately, it works very well.
Anyway, thank you, David Talbott, for your investigative efforts! Some of it's mind-blowing and hard to get a grasp on, but it sure is an interesting ride! -
this is colossal
-
Maybe the burns because it is in a fixed possition. Its an electromagnetic hub for the rest of the solar system. Essentially the sun is to the solar system what the core of the earth is to us. Roman Korvinus.
-
How is it that a coronal blast can be redirected by solar winds when coming off the surface of the sun?
-
Beads on a string, basically Buddhist prayer beads
-
Can someone tell me what the object at 5:32 is please? Double tipped scepter like thing.
40m 50sLenght
945Rating