CREATION, HAWKING AND COSMOLOGY

@FlankerVT what created an axiom?there are truths that are there uncreated.

what created god? It just doesn't make sense that god always existed. Where did he come from? There is always a beginning. I don't think there is an exception with god. I agree that god came before the big bang. but what came before god? What created god?

@HeroesofApostasy Hahahaha...see I told you. Its more to it then that. check this out: "You did not choose me, but I chose you and appointed you to go and bear fruit—fruit that will last."-Jesus the Messiah. SO there you have it. you believe not because you haven't been chosen by God to believe. But If after reading this you begin to believe its because God chose you to.

@HeroesofApostasy Though you should live by faith. I will tell you of personal evidence. 1. I heard Jesus call my name. 2. I have seen his face. 3. I have seen the spirit of God. 4. Watch my video "testimony of the end 2". 5. I can feel God's presence. 6. I see God now and then. 7. I see angels and demons. 8. An angel spoke to me in Hebrew(voice of Thunder) he said translated "God is with you". There is much more. Even when I have told u this will you believe? No, cause faith is not by sight.

@rabbichaimmoshe I don't think that works. In order to make a decision you have to make a change from not deciding to deciding. So in order for him to decide to make the world he would have to change.

@Edella The are someone things I should response to, this being one of them. Jesus is the way the Truth and the Life.

@Dawitness11 " But no I say "believe first, then you will see." A truly frightening statement. Simply imaging someone applying this *logic* to a Holy Book that is not your own (let's say, the Qur'an) should highlight the problem with this statement for you: Just BELIEVE the Qur'an is the true Word of God, then you will see! Might you have a problem with that?

@HeroesofApostasy I am sure you have heard the saying "seeing is believing." But no I say "believe first, then you will see."

@HeroesofApostasy Among the Jews you are the worst. Moses was real they still talk about him today. There is nothing I can say to convince you other wise. Instead I will take it up with the king of kings and ask him to cause you to believe for the sake of your own soul.

@HeroesofApostasy No God is behind space. I really don't know how to desrcibe it but I can give me best explaintion. God's face looks down on all of his creation at once. There is a place behind the darkness of space, kind of like a space behind space. and there where he looks at all things. How do I know? because even to this day when I look up I see my salvation.

@HeroesofApostasy This is how you can recognize the Spirit of God: Every spirit that acknowledges that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is from God, but every spirit that does not acknowledge Jesus is not from God... The evidence that Jesus once was in the flesh is all over the world, billions of people to this day hold him as their Lord and savior. go down your street, look its a meeting place called a church. Do you believe that Moses existed?

@HeroesofApostasy i didn't say he was right.it's just his theory about relative time which is found in challenge that intriguies me.

@HeroesofApostasy such a literalist tsk tsk

@Edella all limited things that are in time have causes.that which is beyond time and is unchangeable is without cause. let us take a truth-if it requires no cause for its truth then it is relatively self actualizing it needs nothing else to validate it. what is therefore the ultimate axiom requires nothing else to cause it.rather it causes other ideas to exist which in turn causes other ideas until you get to the laws of the universe.

@HonestDiscussioner no-because causing changes does not change Him

wont you make a video about Jesus. the title should say "Was Jesus the Messiah?"

But if the beginner is outside of the system, then he is outside of time and also changeless. Your argument to refute hawking refutes your own argument as well.

" It is clear that an original being beyond any kind of limitation had to be the cause of all causes." Hi Rabbi. The above statement seems to be a variation on the Cosmological Argument. One objection to this argument (amongst many others) is that it is special pleading. Namely, it asserts without good reason (IMO) that everything except God needs a cause. Everything must have a cause, apart from the first perfect cause. But why should this be? Enjoyable video as always, Rabbi.

CREATION, HAWKING AND COSMOLOGY

About | Information | History | Online | Facts | Discovery

Comments