Cosmology in Crisis Part 1

About | Information | History | Online | Facts | Discovery

1. A very concise video. Tells you all that you need in order to choose between big bangers and EU. Nature is simple and very elegant so I choose EU. Moreover, anyone acquainted with electricity and high energy electromagnetism knows deep inside that ours, is an electrical Universe. The new data retrieved by satélites is screaming to scientists but they are stubborn and keep on ignoring it.Kristian Birkland, Hannes Alfvén, Irving Langmuir, Nicola Tesla and others were the true pioneers and geniuses, and its a shame to look at this huge amount of modern brain power of the mainstream scientists, giving it all away and just ignoring what is obvious, just to be on the spotlights with big bangs, dark matter, dark energy, black holes, etc, all things that they say themselves, can´t be seen BUT EXIST (only in black boards filed with mathematics). Eyes open people. No fear. Be safe.
2. Sagan's cosmological religion is of the Devil and in the end Velikovsky will be vindicated and Sagan to be marginalized. And Tesla will be vindicated making Edison into no more than a clownish sideshow. By comparison Edison was retarded with respect to Tesla he was no more than a tinkering amateur who had to repeat experiments over and over and over. Tesla thought complex equations inside of his head without the benefit of using a blackboard. 
3. Keep your eye on the Thunderbolts Project and watch the evolution of astrophysics into an electromagnetic model of the universe. They are seeking funding to do the hardcore science and research to publish a peer reviewed paper. Watch how this single revelation will transform our society for the better. The current model is in line with all the lies and corruption that is so prevalent in the world today.
4. Exactly. Plasma Universe actually fits perfectly. Black Hole Theory is a joke. But, then again, as usual, we have people in power who control a religion. In this case secular science. 
5. Gravity is so feeble that, in my opinion, the nearest star, Proxima Centauri's gravity field has no effect on our solar system whatsoever. Gravity isn't what holds galaxies together and this has been known for decades. All observed spiral galaxies rotational velocities are such that stars should be being flung into empty space. Or another way to look at it, the galaxies shouldn't even exist because of this. EU goes much farther into explaining our observations of the visible universe!
6. Yes I see where the misunderstanding comes from. I, and I'm pretty sure rcamargofreitas, was referring to the total net charge in the universe. Just like atoms have separate charges on a small scale, the universe has separated charges and charges that flow. Just like atoms though on a larger scale, looking at the universe as a whole it has very close to a zero net charge. Glad that was cleared up.
7. I would say that the Universe is in equilibrium based on your explanation. You're not wrong, but electric currents do move in space. Space appears to be electrically neutral because it's in equilibrium. So, good response. I was thinking in terms of Universal Entropy as "electrically neutral" apparently. Thanks for the correction. 
8. I'm really late on this, but yes, it can be demonstrated that, for all practical purposes, that the universe is electrically neutral. This can be done by simple calculations of what would happen if, say, the sun had one ppb too many electrons. It would cause an enormous bang, far larger than that of a supernova. This can probably be applied to the universe as a whole. It's probably safe to say that any charge imbalance is an incredibly small one.
9. *sigh* Too many bookshelves, has no one heard of that magnificent piece of modern engineering called a television?
10. *sigh* Does no one have a voice anymore? -.-
11. How do you know that the Universe is electrically neutral? Have you tested it?
12. whats this lol
13. Uhm, why don't you just speak, rather than writting it out? If I wanted to read for 10 minutes, I'd visit a website.
14. All the pseudoscientists love Nikola Tesla. No one listen to this person. He/she doesn't know squat about the forces. 
15. 2:17 "EM forces are also longer ranged than gravitational forces in most instances..." Are we talking about the same universe here?
16. the site that linked me here has done plenty of science surf a bit you weill have your answers
17. @vlatin1 nice1 
18. @chylerreckeaolgodhul What has changed is that even evolutionary developement biologist are now challenging starting to challenge the neo modern evolutionary synthesis. If you want to learn more about revolutionary thinking in biology google "revolution in biology" and you can research many of the new revolutionary concepts in biology yourself.
19. @chylerreckeaolgodhul The ENCODE project has changed a large percentage of what we thought we knew about biology and the genome. There is now a split on the standard neo Darwinian structural DNA gene centered paradigm and the new epigenetic models that are now challenging the modern synthesis with overwhelming data. In some fields people are having to relearn all over again. Evolutionary development biology/ evo devo The extended synthesis Key words "The revolution in biology" 
20. @72bergmans Dude, I'm glad you did this so I don't have to. My condolences for the bit of life you had to waste debunking this crap; those are minutes you'll never get back.