Bursting Inflation Theory's Bubble

About | Information | History | Online | Facts | Discovery

1. It's simple we came from a singularity, the only thing that can create a singularity is a black hole, a black hole comes from a decaying star and can feed on more black holes and matter, our known universe was born from the big bang "singularity" this clearly indicates that at one period of time, posibble 23 billions of years ago we were part of another unknown universe which is very far away, and we only think that our big bang universe is the only one, but there could be more big bangs all over the universe, I predict that one day we would see a gigantic mass of galaxies approaching our known universe, and then we would realize that we are so much smaller than we thought and that the universe is really infinity. bubbles and parallel universes is not credible from my point of view, light is projected in all directions, if parallel universes were true we would see random things appearing and disappearing from no where.
2. Turok - spot on!
3. nope.Gravitational waves now been detected
4. Given the Space Spherical attributes. lets put this aside for a moment. Anytime an explosion happens small or big in space or not. At the outer portions of the expansion bubble you can see smaller Spherical gasses ,sparks or the outer shell moving rapidly outwards. Same thing happens in water. Then our cells that started as 1 then divided and kept on going, and at a given point rapidly speeds up before birthing. same thing just a different way of similarizing this. In addition, my question is the definition of a different Multiverse. as every person looks different but are indeed alike. the differences between multiverses may only be the same as ours. ex. every Galaxy etc is different. But they are in the same Universe that we reside in......
   If the Theory of Relativity pertains here then it must pertain everywhere else too. and not just in Space. And why is it still being called a Theory? Quote me if wrong on this next part. but isn't every Mathematics lie within The Theory of Relativity? and Time is Mathematical. I only ask because lots of Sci-guys are beginning to say i don't exist.
5. non physics major here, read Brian greenes book, I though that the inflation field remained in a high potential energy state as space expanded really really fast and then "fell down" resulting in the conversion of energy into radiation/matter and stopped the massive cosmic expansion?
6. why our physicist are gays
7. So we live in a planet that is round which is in a solar system that is round which is in a galaxy thats round and all galaxies are in a universe thats inside a round bubble. Surround by parallel bubble universes and all the bubble universe are all inside this other round bubble and another bubble, and another. So everything beyond is a infinite bubble within a bubble, withing a bubble, etc.
8. Then please help me. The CMBR proves inflation in five or more ways. Consider one: The CMBR represents a cosmos far too large to be 380,000 years old. It's so large that it can't communicate info, and that alone proves that the particles were moved apart faster than they could interact, etc. That's two I can spit out. But please enlighten me. I get his point that we have no "observational data" for something that began even before the big bang. But with gravity wave data from LIGO in 2014 we can see a billion-billion-billion-billionth of a second after the bang. He basically said we can't see back before we can see. That's always been the case. Theoretical physics is where data takes us, and then we get stumped again. I'll study Mr. Turok's peer-reviewed material. Peace.
9. He is right. Inflation is not a scientific theory
10. Well. After he said "failed to predict gravitational waves" we know this video is old. I am highly suspicious of Neil's close minded and scientifically conservative interpretation of the Universe,
11. Neil Turok's theory is ridiculous.
12. AMERICAN WHITE DECLARES A TAKEN AND OVERTHROWN TERRORIST DOOMS DAY BY SABATINO A HOLD OPPOCOOLYSSISOUSS OF THE GOVERNMENT THAT QUIT THERE BAD HABITS AND STILL HAVE AN ADDICTION FACTIOUS COMMUNISM INFER CONTAMINATION OF COLD CONFLICT PRESENTED IN SACRIFICE OR THEY DIE AN TANGLE OF SAFETY FOR TAX PAYERS LEGAL CONTRAVOURSSY OF LIBERTY OF THERE POCKETS WITH IN THE COUNTRY A PURSUIT TO EMPPED AN ATTEMPT OF TERRORIST CRIMINAL ENDANGERMENT UNITED SECRET AUTHORITY DEFENSE AND TASK FORCE OF LAND REGIONS PURSUIT IN MOODIEST APATHY OSSIFICATION DIPLOMACY INFER SACRIFICE TORRENT CONFIDENTIAL RESTRICTION OF MAJORITY CLASSIFICATION HUMAN BELIEF WHO IS IN CONTROL THE TRUTH NO BUDDY WAS
    THE OUTSTANDING LARCENY OF OVER TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS OF REVENUE NOT THEIRS AND OUTSTANDING STANDARD CONDITIONS AMERICAN GOVERNMENT A OFFICIAL ARMED MAFIA WHO KILLED SINERS SAYS THE AR-RESTRAINT OF IMPRIARR DISCOVERY WITH IN HUMAN CLASSIFICATION WITH EXPLOSIVES AS JUDGMENT AN CLAIM OFFER NO REMORSE OF FIREWORKS AND LIES OF SUCH ATTACK PRINCIPAL VENDETTA AND A LARGE NEED OF BREACH IN THERE DICIEST THAT VEBLEN WITH IN THERE SHOULDER TO SHOULDER MONEY THEY PROFIT YOU CANT BREAK THEM INFER DOUBLE STRENGTH THE VIOLATION THERE MISSION CAUSED AND THE HUGE ATTENTIONS ACUTE INFER SANITY DISTILLERY PERPETUATED CRIMINAL OPERATICALLY TERRORIST PRINCIPAL A NATION INVIGORATING BLEAK MOUSINESS DOUBLE WHAMMY CAUTION SLIPPERY WHEN WET WITH HELD GRAMMY SAID DELTA LOOKING TO A NEW ACTION STAR OF ANGRY PERSON HOW WOULD EXCUSE SECURITY TO SET THE JUSTICE COUNSEL INNOCENCE CONVICTION HELD IN THE IMPRIARR MENTION PLAIN MOTIONS DAMAGED AND HEART BROKEN AND ALONE TURNS TO ONE COUIOUITRAM PLIGHTING AUTHORITY DECOMMISSIONS IN AN REPRISAL MISSION AND THE PERPETUATE BL AIM OF DAMAGE CAUSED WEST COAST DYSENTERY LIVE ?DOMMANDING RENEWAL SIMPLISTICALLY RIPPED OFF POPULATION MANNOTIHOIIOLIAC LARCENY MINIOCOAL MIJORITY PINIEST
    DELTA ACTIVE PRELIMINARY ENEMY BREACH OF LAND REGION DISCOVERED AND POPULATIONS BUSINESS AND GOVERNMENT IMPORTANCE SIMPLY INFLATION JUST SIMPLY INFLATION TO COUNTRY AND GOVERNMENT
13. The finding of gravitational waves damages a part of his excellent argument.
14. it's a shame Alan Guth wasn't on the panel, that would have been interesting.
15. It is hard to not be cynical; to not question the motivations of scientists --  this is particularly true when we all know where funding comes from and what happens to those who stray from the official dogma of the Church of Standard Model Cosmology.
    If you don't believe that persecution of heretics occurs, just ask Halton Arp or
    Stephen J. Crothers
16. MOAR!!
17. I dont like Turok and his "theories". He always laughs about everything multiverse related, and then presents a semi-"non plausible" theory you cant prove. "Oh multiverse, inflation? Nonsense! A new universe is created within every new black hole!" which, in the end, is the same concept as the inflationary multiverse, and, same as the multiverse idea, it isn't falsifiable, where inflation still has the chance to be proven right, for example with gravitational waves. He did the same thing with his "clapping-universe" model...
18. Just because I'm not a scientist doesn't mean I cant bring up questions regarding
    Cosmology! Inflation may seem to work with the current standard model but it seems
    like a far fetched explanation. Einstein said the speed of light is the maximum
    velocity in the universe.. Prove otherwise! Quantum entanglement is not all that
    useful either. Science allows people to dispute ideas and should be freely discussed.
    If some of you think your understanding is more accurate, fine, but don't call me a
    you tube wanna be. I read about cosmology long before the internet!
19. I want the full version before I go to bed. :)
20. Inflation-of-the-gaps. And even Neil Turck is making Big Bang assumptions. The preconditions of the universe were not "nothing". Our de sitter space was preceded by anti-de sitter space, no need for Big Bang. The program has been uploaded.