Blunders in Reasoning by Evolutionists - Dr. Jason Lisle - Origins
About | Information | History | Online | Facts | Discovery
Dr. Lisle gives a lesson in logic and the fallacies evolutionists make. | Dr. Lisle's Blog: http://www.jasonlisle.com | On ICR http://www.icr.org/jason_lisle/ | Origins Podcast - https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/origins/id421176606 | About Jason Lisle, Ph.D Dr. Jason Lisle is a Christian astrophysicist who writes and speaks on various topics relating to science and the defense of the Christian faith. He graduated summa cum laude from Ohio Wesleyan University where he double-majored in physics and astronomy and minored in mathematics. He then earned a master's degree and a Ph.D. in astrophysics at the University of Colorado in Boulder. Dr. Lisle specialized in solar astrophysics and has made a number of scientific discoveries regarding the solar photosphere, including the detection of giant cell boundaries using the SOHO spacecraft. He also does theoretical research and has contributed to the field of general relativity. Since completion of his research at the University of Colorado, Dr. Lisle began working in full-time apologetics ministry, specializing in the defense of Genesis. He has written a number of articles and books on the topic. His most well-known book, The Ultimate Proof of Creation, demonstrates that biblical creation is the only logical possibility for origins. Dr. Lisle wrote and directed the popular planetarium shows at the Creation Museum, including "The Created Cosmos." He now works (beginning in April, 2012) as director of research at the Institute for Creation Research.
Comments
-
Firstly, you need to define Evolution. Mutation and Natural Selection have of course been observed and tested - nobody disputes this, it is empirical science. Creationists reject the claim that these fundamental Darwinian mechanism's can account for the origin of life & one species evolving into another - this is not empirical science & we refute this type of evolution. Living cells are information systems & information does not originate by itself - just like my computer didn't create itself.
-
I like how evolutionist say life all started from a "simple cell" lol that forgot that before the cell atoms have to bond to form molecules then in turn molecules have to bond to form proteins then amino acids and so forth each with there own individual complexities lol and they call themselves scientists lol
-
potholer is an idiot...
-
Indeed YOU have to
-
At 10:38 Dr. Lisle makes the statement "Science comes out of the Christian world view anyway". Anyone care to elaborate on the reasoning behind that?
-
The guy explains how arguments work at the beginning and I think that I actually learned something, but after that the video just went off the deep end.
-
Well you have to willingly reduce your intellect to reject truth.
-
It's a pity that vid doesn't show speciation. It does nothing to dispel the false dichotomy between "micro" and "macro" evolution.
-
Evolution has not be proven (to my reasonably extensive knowledge). Now I fully expect your insults. The faith evolutionist have in their unprovable myth generally leads to anger, followed by insults.
-
Gets my vote for golden crocoduck
-
What does speciation have to do with anything? Of course God created the animal kinds with the genetic coding to produce great variations, and humans may call a wolf a different species than a golden retriever, but they are still dogs. They are the same kind.
-
Evolution has been proven multiple times, my personal favourite being this russian experiment that proves speciation beyond any shadow of a doubt: /watch?v=EoB0pdhxfZs&feature=youtu.be Evolution has never been disproven (to my reasonably extensive knowledge), & your very suggestion that it has demonstrates an ignorance of your chosen topic. Normally this would be through no fault of your own, but you obviously have internet access, so sadly this is not the case.
-
Your user name describes you perfectly. You're indeed a slave.
-
this is worth the golden crockoduck. potholer can you debunk it even if it does not win?
-
I give credits to this guy for debunking evolution more than I do to Kent Hovind!
-
Gravity is a well tested & observed theory, so much so that it is considered a law. Evolution is a failed hypothesis that has never been observed, but disproved in a million different ways.
-
It's really socially unacceptable now to not be trendy and to question anything.
-
Erm...I'm not even sure anyone knows this at all, but creationism was a scientific theory, when the turn of the century came round, they adopted Darwinism, and the Christians kinda just stuck with the one that Included god....but i guess no one cares anymore, it's a trend now to be gay and an atheist.
-
7:30 - This is one area where Dr. Lisle's descriptions seem to go very off-mark, in my opinion. The word "Theory" in "The Theory of Evolution" is used in the same way as it is with Atomic Theory, Germ Theory, and the Theory of Gravity (which is a different concept than the Law of Gravity).
26m 32sLenght
280Rating