Big Bang Theory

About | Information | History | Online | Facts | Discovery

1. Wrong, Peter! The Big Bang THEORY - it is ONLY a theory, not "fact" - was made up out of thin air by Lemaitre - a sold "Christian"(Catholic, no less). A Belgian PRIEST, yes. It is precisely because I use my God-given intelligence that I was forced to stop believing in the popular Big Bang paradigm. It does not hold up to even cursory scientific perusal. Jesus would agree. Jesus was very intelligent. He would have read the science and concluded that the Big Bang paradigm was invented to protect Catholic dogma from improvement.
2. Hi everyone, can anyone tell me if there is any actual evidence that proves black holes eats planets and stars? as I always see these images that just looks like its bending light but when they have done there pass all the stars still looks like they are all there?
   I would really appreciate some actual evidence and not just a theory?
3. This is also a fucking autistic person, he words it like a retard.
4. If this is indeed right, the BBT will fall Big... and it will hit with a Bang - they will still prevail. - just kidding!
5. You see, atheist are trying to make themselves have something, so they chose science. Now, however, they are tryin to make us think that science is not in the bible... But we have miracles, proof, proof we could know, proof we have personally have. If you are a Christian and never had a miracle, that means you have to be more searious about God.
6. THANK U FOR EXPOSING ZIO-SATANISTS, EMPIRE OF FRAUDSTERS, MASS MURDERERS, ASSASSINS OF CHILDREN & WOMEN, PICK POCKETS
7. The Big Bang Theory didn't "arise" from Hubble. It was invented by a Belgian Priest. I don't know what you're trying to do here, but please don't be lazy with the facts. I assume you're trying to throw away the big bang because you're a creationist, this unfortunately contradicts logic. A man wrote Genesis, but God alone gave you a logical brain. Use it. God is the intelligent creator; He invented science and discovery for us to use. It disappoints me when Christians throw reason in the garbage can, as it gives Christianity a bad name. I'm sorry, but this video is just doing more harm than good. Just read your comment section.
8. The guy points out that quasars are more redshifted than their host galaxies. But this is easily explainable- the light they emit loses energy as it emerges from the gravitational well of the black hole at the center of the quasar. That extra redshift effect occurs over the first several hours of the photon being emitted from the quasar. It is independent of the additional redshift that affects all light that traverses billions of light years on its way here.
9. If everything was held together by gravity, but then expanded. And Gravity was still present, why isn't the universe a super massive sun like what started the Big Bang. The universe should be one sun. They can't explain why we have individual Suns and galaxies... The Big Bang suggest we should be the universe before it began.
10. I totally agree. All of our conventional science is misleading. Designed deliberately this way to keep the general masses dumbed down, and away from the truth. Anyone who ever tried to expose conventional science or archaeology, or expose any truth for that matter, is suppressed, killed, publicly humiliated, ridiculed, bankrupt. They did exactly the same thing to Nikola Tesla. We are just now finding this out. Our science is based on bunch of theories. Same with the theory of evolution, Darwinian theory. Darwin was a eugenist. They deliberately made us think that this is a rat race of a life, survival of the fittest competition. Competition will be our end, it will lead to our extinction. Only cooperating, working together will help us. If the theory of evolution is correct, then why is it not called a fact? Why can't we find the missing link all of this time. We find dinosaur bones, that supposedly predate humanity. I'm sure we should have found a bunch of missing links by now. We are constantly rediscovering what our ancient ancestors already knew. What about the movie Forbidden Archeology. Many scientists and archaeologists, researches disprove conventional archaeology in this film. I believe that humanity existed millions of years. I don't know how the universe came into existence, but what I do know is that what we were taught is false. Electric Universe Theory presents new evidence. Vortex Based Mathematics, the torus is also another way to look at this. Hyper dimensional physics, quantum physics. I believe we are on the break of change. The old scientific standard model will come crashing down. Everybody subscribed to the conventional science, because they just follow the herd. You should follow your mind instead.
11. Scientists (and atheists alike) seem to unite under a covenant of 'Scientific Tunnel Vision', a psychologically self-imposed collection of blinkers, choosing to not examine more than what immediately meets the eye, thereby ignoring the realms of spiritual phenomenon - the only other possibility that exists... "what we can not measure we can not know; therefore what can not be measured is unworthy of our observation". Explaining God scientifically is as impossible as explaining psychic, metaphysical or spiritual phenomenon, even though they exist.
    When atheists are presented with critical, reasoned arguments, they often respond with personal insults, denial, distorted logic and reasoning sighting mass-media propaganda, or semantics, with excessive detail of complete speculation presented as truth..deviating from the critical point at hand and talking at cross purposes to evade it.. or resort to the child-like "unicorns & fairies" mantra, motivated seemingly by atheist hate. This is not a criticism. (sorry, you will be ignored)
    Reasoned argument 1/...There are 12 zodiac signs that dictate your 'core / general' personality character traits. Once the alignments of the planetary positions are calculated at time and location of birth, more acute personality traits are reliably and consistently determined to an incredibly accurate degree. That's as real and no less intangible as any other mystical phenomenon, yet it's ignored and palmed off as hogwash (for evidence test it online yourself.)
    2/ Evolution & mutation is only a process, with limits. The mechanism has no creative power. No mutation is possible with out genetic DNA instructions of coded information that supports it in the first place. So where did these organisms of molecular intelligence originate? Evolution explains nothing, except the concept of evolution with its potential. It is still only a theory and yet is being oversold as fact to evoke proof of no God, through mass-media, and swallowed!
    3/ Where there is design there must be a designer. True or False?
    4/ If the earth were knocked off its rotating axis around the sun by 2" ( so to speak) earth would either burn up or freeze (depending). True or false?...we're just lucky huh? How about the moon? with its gravitational pull on our oceans for nutrient / oxygen spreading currents for sea life to exist, and to stop water stagnation, to name just two (pure luck?)
    5/ Every aspect of nature has a purpose and function, designed perfectly to fulfil its roll. By definition that's the epitome of intelligent design. Human intelligence pails in comparison at best. So where did intelligence come from? consciousness? our senses? imagination? evil? psychic / spiritual phenomenon? emotions? perception of good, bad, right & wrong?...where did our conscience originate? more so...why?
    6/ The rise of the industrial revolution spawned the rise of 'western materialism'. Since then scientists and the media have been perpetually funded to discover new theories for media to feed the masses...perpetually. Why? funded by who? Once you control mainstream media you control everything society reads, hears, see's and thinks. Never have you, or will you, see a TV documentary or nature show, or any Mass-Media, supporting reasoned arguments 'for' God and Creation. Why? The arguments and public interest would be boundless, and yet nothing!
12. He says this debunks BBT but an astrophysicst could probably explain exactly why this guy's claims fails in mere seconds. This is why he's hiding out on the internet instead of submitting his "findings" to peer-review.
13. The big bang is the biggest load of rubbish since religion.
14. More crap from catholic vatican club... The astronomer who coined the term "Big Bang" actually intended to make fun of the theory! In the 1950s, British astrophysicist Sir Fred Hoyle 
    Monseigneur Georges Henri Joseph Édouard Lemaître; 17 July 1894 – 20 June 1966 was a Belgian Roman Catholic priest, astronomer and professor of physics at the French section of the Catholic University of Louvain.[1] He was the first known academic to propose the theory of the expansion of the universe... Lemaître also proposed what became known as the Big Bang theory of the origin of the Universe, which he called his "hypothesis of the primeval atom" or the "Cosmic Egg".[8]?
15. And let me guess, you have a replacement theory all lined up that includes a magical garden/talking snake?
    
    If his findings were shot down by other scientists, then it's probably because the findings were utter crap and had nothing to do with the scientists trying to censor him. There really are problems with the big bang, mostly proving what happened at the singularity and before, but not leading up to. There is no credible problem that I am aware of regarding red shift. Also, the guy narrating describes the big bang as an 'explosion', which is inaccurate and immediately costs him credibility points.
    
    Also, Cosmic Microwave Background radiation? Let me guess again, another 'scientist' who found 'holes' in it, but was censored?
16. 0:09 the theory doesn't state a point of "very dense matter". The theory states a near, if not infinite, infinite point of energy. You may know it as a "singularity". A point that defies the very laws of physics and breaks down matter, light, and time itself. In which anti-matter and matter were being created constantly and cancelling eachother out and at one moment BOOM there was more matter than anti-matter and thus caused a rapid expansion.
    0:28 From the timeline we've theorized for the big bang theory, the galaxies didn't start to group up. In fact they're drifting apart. They started close together and for the most part are now drifting away from each other.
    1:17 Hubble was not the one to make the first observations that the universe was expanding. It was first observed  and theorized that the expanding universe might be traced back to a single point by Georges Lemaître.
    1:25 What you're talking about, "wavelengths getting larger", was discovered by Christian Doppler. It's called the Doppler effect. (Even Einstein knew about redshift)
    2:15 We no longer use the redshift to date events of the universe. We use measurements of Background Radiation
    3:10 Quasars have a much larger redshift because of how much energy they produce. (notice if you have a dimmer switch on a light bulb, the less energy put in the more red it is, the more you put in the more white it appears. Energy output matters in this calculation)
    4:22 There is, in no sense, a way that this disproves the Big Bang Theory. There are several theories that use the Big Bang theory that don't believe that the universe is still expanding. Just because you don't believe it's expanding anymore doesn't mean the Big Bang is disproved.
    4:28 Now I'm not defending that, because it was very wrong to hide the research because not only does it keep everyone in the dark but lessons scientific growth, however if I had to guess at why that happened, I'd say that the peer review system is what blocked it. They figured it'd set back scientific thought in society if it got out. One bit of information that contradicted it would make everyone think the ENTIRE theory was debunked when, in reality, the theory may have needed to be corrected. But that's just my guess.
    6:08 See, there's that word. Fix. Correct.
    7:25 I have no rebuttal on that as I've never studdied it and I'm going to honorably say that it seems like a very good point
    8:00 The Super Cluster you're referring to is called The Sloan Great Wall Super Cluster of Galaxies. It's very much so possible and has no infringement on the Big Bang Theory. If anything, The Sloan Great Wall helped improve our understanding of the expanding universe by helping us rationalize "dark energy."
    9:49 good background knowledge for those who don't know anything about quasars
    
    All in all, you seem to not know much about the theory and what it states. It seems you've researched a lot of what refutes it but it's hard to refute something when you don't understand what it's refuting. You also have a lot of rewordings of the same thing over and over and never really did a basic concession refutation build. You're explaining a lot about how certain parts of it are wrong but never really explain how it proves it's wrong, of course, other than your quotes nearing the end of your video. however you did have 2 decent points which was the William Tifft's redshift chart and the explanation that the peer review system kept this quiet. However, I'm having a hard time taking your word for any of this information since you got so many of the basic principles wrong and couldn't create a powerful argument. Which leads into me saying I'm glad you completely cited your sources and gave credit to those who deserve it, not many people on the internet do that and it's nice to know some people still care. If anything, your video has not disproved the big bang theory, but proved that the redshift measurements are not accurate in every circumstance. So I not only dislike the video because I disagree, but because I did not enjoy the format, the argument, nor the lack of concessions in the video.
17. I will fall back on the same kind of  argument that every bible thumping (not reading) christian says when confronted with the absolute hold in your hand truth that contradicts the gospel. You can tell me any story you like but I will still not believe there is a god.
18. Believe what you like there will still be no god .
19. It's called a singularity dumbo and little mass I don't think so