Astronomy Simplified (#1): Basics of Time and Distance

About | Information | History | Online | Facts | Discovery

1. Liked it
2. Thats gud
3. It would feel like answering the question 'Have you built a house?' by 'yes!', if you'd had only drawn a square on a piece of paper.
4. But than came along the 'quantum world'. As we knitted more particles, we realized this world came real out of the imaginary. This 'imaginary' world became real. In the macro world that would mean the sky's the limit, but that isn't the case. This quantum world has rules too. So we are constantly oberving on the verge of the imaginary. That would mean there could be a God, but it would be way too abusive to reality if you'd just jump over all of physics, straight to that God.
5. I understand exactly what you mean, I have the same problem with creationists. They seem to be anti-materialists, and don't believe what is being registered, but than they still pretend to 'be' here and talk to you like they 'are'. Whilst the essential for a creationist is 'not being', 'not registering', 'believing what ISN'T there', etc. To us it feels like a double standard.
6. IS THIS A GIRL OR A BOY? I AM CONFUSED........
7. Sorry but you sound seriously uninformed. I've seen classmates bullshit stuff so similar to this it makes me think that you are also. Also, you regard creationists as if we are aliens or something. Annoying! 
8. how do you even know time is a linear function? rediculous! man has no idea! were you their at creation? were you there at big bang? no! man does not even know how water works much less creation,, mysteries in front of us they cant explain much less 6000 years ago
9. @runawayloco Stars twinkle because of turbulence in the atmosphere of the Earth.
10. goor video!
11. you are hot
12. are you a dude or a chick? 
13. What planet do you know that emits it's own light? A planet always reflects light, cus if it emits light it stops being a planet, cus only suns can emit their own light.
14. The time for mankind to honor itself will soon come to and end, all you thought was impossible will be reality...
15. Why would I want to argue with a "creationist," or any fundamentalist for that matter? It would be like having a discussion with a drunk, talking in circles with no regard for logic or common sense - just a colossal waste of time!
16. First of all, U jump from "definition" to definition without defining anything, "Time is the succession of some events with others" so it is intuitive. and If Apes "evolved" into humans, how come there are still apes None of the creatures chose what physical attributes they will have next, Our creator has specified everyone and everything with their attributes. The snow leopard was giving his attributes to survive the environment he lives in. We do not have a choice in our existance,
17. I don't think you understand the concept of evolutionary theory very well. The neo Darwinist view is that we evolved from a common ancestor of modern living apes, not that we evolved from them directly. There is little physical evidence to support this. If you know of physical evidence, please let me know and I will contact Fred Spoors immediately and tell him I've met someone who can solve this transitional sequence that he has been working most of his life to confirm with little success.
18. Play is ok, but there comes a time to move from alphabet blogs and peekaboo to more complex toys and games.
19. Are you a troll or simply retarded?
20. "No evidence"? No. Very scant evidence? Yes. That "living fossils" exist is not evidence against evolution any more than the continued existence of apes means we did not evolve from apes.