Astronomers Have No Idea How Planets Form | Space News

About | Information | History | Online | Facts | Discovery

1. If you are going to run an experiment you do not run all the same model.
   *edited for spelling.
2. My Theory is Saturn is a metallic planetoid remnant from a supernova, a "Pinball" (magnetar?), and when Jupiter and Sun, "Ferciel - fiery sphere of light", were forming, this Pinball Saturn caused an electrical discharge from Jupiter, in essence stealing the gods thunder, resulting in Jupiter's current Brown Dwarf/ Failed Star state, perturbing Venus' orbit into the inner solar system, Venus entering the inner solar system potentially created asteroid belt, got too close and caused electrical discharge scar on Mars resulting in loss of atmosphere and weakened magnetic field, atmosphere traversed to closest object and caused biblical noahdic flood on Earth, while Venus is still stabilizing in its current orbit.
3. Alchemy - magnetic chemistry, including electro-, thermo-, and paramagnetism
4. https://m.facebook.com/2012brendan/albums/1133434996719167/
5. So the Earth really gave birth to our Moon.. .  .Rather how some of our solar system's moon's can be seen ejecting material out into space through violent eruptions.. .  .
6. http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Electric_Universe
7. if Mars was larger then earth, doe's anyone believe it would be almost forced to contain life ???
8. So youtube recommended me to watch fucking pseudo-science bs.
9. Even considering the standard model of accretion disk electromagnetic force should be considered the major force acting due to the proximity of matter in a plasma environment. So, gravitational model is wrong any way.
10. My Uncle is a retired engineer and has worked on projects from the SR-71, Lunar Rover and finishing out his career working on the orbital engines of the Space Shuttle. He has written a book which you can download for free on iPad and now iPhone which explains his theory on planet formation which he has been working on for the past 13 years.
    
    https://itunes.apple.com/us/book/formation-solar-system-21st/id683398265?mt=11
    
    Like this theory, he dismisses the long held belief of the accretion theory, and instead uses his background in cryogenics and propulsion to explain how the planets formed.
    
    Take a look, it's free.
11. The EU is closer to the truth than conventional science but falls short of the truth. Until science realizes that the universe was created supernaturally science will continue to be wrong.
12. Okay. I'm going to throw this speculation out there. It's something I have been contemplating recently. Is it possible that Stars give birth to planets, ejecting them from their bulk? After the planet has been ejected, does it take up residency as a "child" of the Mother Star? If Stars give birth to planets by projecting them from their surface, does this prove that Stars are sentient? Are stars living beings that give birth in much the same way humans do, by nurturing a separate mass and then projecting it into the Universe? Perhaps there is a reason why the gravitational dust accretion model does not work. 
    No one has ever caught a star ejecting a planet from its bulk. What would one look for to verify this theory? Do Stars give birth to planets?
    
    Stars and their planets are very far away, and our view of them is dim. If planets were being ejected from stars long ago, or at a vast distance away from us, it would be extremely difficult to catch these Stars in the act. Surely we would not know if it happened within our own solar system.  
13. 1% does not know what's going on. Come on, get up to speed. Don't be like most big bangers, get educated and then ask questions.
14. This got me thinking - do planets form by attracting matter through the gravity of a 'star' at their core? I'm familiar with the hollow earth theory which it itself speaks of an 'inner sun'. Perhaps a central core (star) is what determines the immediate outer core via the plasma that is the universe? I would then equate stars as focal points of consciousness. Thoughts anybody?
15. Crooked view. Even tried upside down, backwards and inside out, but blurriness only sharpened a little at times. Right at end, clarity really dropped off...
16. why only few hundred upvotes!!! 
    I don't understand. We are solidly discovering that we have been told fairy tales for a century or so, and no one bats an eye!
17. Just found this...
    https://public.nrao.edu/news/pressreleases/planet-formation-alma
    ..could that be an hoax or some type of phenomenon?
18. I would like to see the math behind this. All the things he talks about fits fine in the theory we have at the moment. He just neglects to inform of the countless ways for planets and stars being thrown out of solarsystems due to the chaos of the formation of the solarsystem. Or the "weird" orbits that also fits fine in the gravitational theory. We see alot of "hot jupiter" exo planets because these are the biggest and dim the light of its host star the most. But it does not take much for a planet to get out of orbit and start a collision course with its host star. This process can be stopped again at some point. But it still fits fine into the model we have today
19. This stuff rings true and blows my mind. 
20. thank you, great...