Are the Dominoes Falling for Standard Cosmology? | Space News
About | Information | History | Online | Facts | Discovery
Science headlines today show signs that elements of the electric universe paradigm are becoming increasingly mainstream. With leaps in technology and data have come the definitive refutation of the notion of an electrically sterile universe. However, the basic premise of a cosmos dominated by the gravitational force remains the backbone of standard cosmology. In this episode, Bishop Nicholas Sykes describes and forecasts the perhaps inevitable paradigm shift towards electric universe concepts. SUPPORT US ON PATREON AND WATCH OUR INFLUENCE GROW: “Changing the world through understanding of the Electric Universe." https://www.patreon.com/tboltsproject Subscribe to Thunderbolts Update newsletter: http://eepurl.com/ETy41 The Thunderbolts Project Home: http://www.thunderbolts.info Essential Guide to the Electric Universe: http://www.thunderbolts.info/wp/eg-contents/ Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/thunderboltsproject Twitter: @tboltsproject Electric Universe by Wal Thornhill: http://www.holoscience.com/wp/ Electric Universe T-shirts and Gifts: http://stickmanonstone.com/ The ideas expressed in videos presented on The Thunderbolts Project YouTube Channel do not necessarily express the views of T-Bolts Group Inc or The Thunderbolts Project(TM).
Comments
-
Mankind's use of the power of God brings rise to the beast and the flames of Hell the power of God is the power of distribution and transformation we see it through the eye of knowledge
-
As the universe exists as an interplay of all four natural forces, I eagerly await a formal mathematical model of this hypothesis such that it may be compared against empirical data and make some testable predictions. (one of the reasons why String Theory has not been fully hashed out and accepted)
-
(((Too Big to Fail))) Excellent video, I've been waiting for someone else to "shut it down!!"
-
People totally fail to understand why light is c in every frame.
Look at the speedometer of your car. Imagine that 100 mph is the speed of light. As you increase in velocity your division marks change (clocks and rulers) proportionally to the energy added from your changes in velocity. Now rotate the dial so that the zero point follows the needle. Notice that 100 mph is still 100 mph and as unobtainable as it always was. Notice also according to your speedometer you are stationary regardless of your actual velocity through space, just as it does now regardless of earths actual velocity through space.
This is why the speed of light remains c regardless of velocity because the velocity component is already compensated for by the changes in our zero points. No two frames traveling at different velocities use the same zero points as their starting points. Until people realize our zero points change proportionally to energy added on the quantum level with changes in velocity, along with our clocks and rulers, the speed of c will never be understood.
One simply can never reach the speed of c using ones own measuring devices, because they change proportionally to energy added as do our zero points so that we will always appear as stationary and 100 mph will always be 100 mph and unobtainable. What your actual velocity in space may be is simply unknowable. -
I would like someone to explain all the inertial forces at work in that simulation of the planets revolving around the sun as it moves through space. I just do not believe that is how things work as I do not feel any inertial forces. i know that when I am driving my truck at 60 miles an hour I am in that truck's inertial frame because I feel those inertial forces with every bump and turn. Nothing of the sort happens as I stand on planet earth and gaze out at the electric universe.
-
It has taken a little time to 'warm up' or take to the Good Bishop. A certain man of the cloth made a mess of things long time ago and religion has not been in my sandbox for GKHLong now.
But this good bishop rocks; or at least he sure seems to know a lot about rocks.
Rock one good Nic.
Namaste and care,
mhikl -
The point made in this video is often my question to people firm in their belief in standard cosmology. I remember, especially, one very erudite and otherwise questioning individual earlier this year. While he was quick with an answer to other points I postulated in favour of EU theory, when I asked him to explain how orbits were maintained with such a slow speed limit as that of light he simply never replied to me. I do believe however, that he will still be trying to rationalise it at this very moment :)
-
Listen to Nassim Haramein !!!!
-
Einstein is explaining the physics of light time and gravity.... if something is found to exceed the speed of light it will never diminish the physics of relativity which has been tested and proven in every way as to become a fact...the universe is governed by nature and in time I think we will find it is really quite a simple place we will always leave behind arcane mentalities as nature continues to truly be illuminated as what governs everything so never let these dead end overthought ideas get you down we are all trying to learn truth and simply move forward it is what enables a correct and mindful evolution of knowladge
-
I think the "bail out" analogy is most apt.
Standard model astro-physicists have been "bailing out" the old model for too long, despite the bankruptcy of its "too big to fail" and out of date ideas. -
Einstein's Theories of relativity lead to Big Bang Theory whereas under Big Bang paradigm there is absolutely no possibility of existence of God for following reasons.
1. Philosophically for any existence; it has to be some substance (visible, invisible, perceivable or not perceivable) and this applies to God also. Substances occupy space but there is absolutely no space for God to exist at the time of Big Bang & before.
2. Four things come out of Big Bang namely space, time, matter & light/radiation. We cannot look for eternal God in space & time as both had the beginning; secondly humans are in a position to produce all types of light/radiation and something which humans can produce could not be the God and since matter is made up of electrons, protons & neutrons these too could not be the God.
However Theories of Relativity & Big Bang Theory including Cosmic Inflation have been mathematically, theoretically & experimentally proved as baseless in the published paper "Experimental & Theoretical Evidences of Fallacy of Space-time Concept and Actual State of Existence of the Physical Universe" which is available at the journal site at http://indjst.org/index.php/indjst/issue/view/2885. For further details refer https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/adopted-paradigm-physics-incorrect-shafiq-khan?trk=prof-post. -
Adopted paradigm of physics is incorrect has been proved through published papers in peer-reviewed journals. For details refer https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/adopted-paradigm-physics-incorrect-shafiq-khan?trk=prof-post.
-
odd that i find myself in agreement with a clergyman....
-
light travels through space and distance and time are relevant... gravity is a force that warps space and is not measured in any sort of a speed calculation... eight minutes ago is light traveling through space ..there is no such a thing as eight minutes ago in gravity quite a blunder sir
-
Love it, can't wait!!!
-
I swear he said "the standard muddle" at one point, and if he didn't, i'm stealing it anyway.
-
Who said "people need to forget relativity" .... Einstein. 🌌
-
100 years, 5 generation, 7 billion and still they believe e=mc2 as mass energy equivalence CORRECT MASS ENERGY EQUIVALENCE is E=M4/3Pi(C+G) cubed by Ferydoon Shirazi. The current model is based on political and economical. Political because Einstein instigated for America develop A-bomb and economical, because big businesses make lots of money on big white elephant project chasing rainbow. They know they are chasing elision which mean they will always have a job looking for it. You need to remember electron is only part of matter which interact with gravity. MG1
-
As far as I am aware the Suns position does not need to be communicated instantaneously to maintain a stable orbit of bodies. If the information was communicated instantaneously, should we not have settled into a perfectly circular orbit by now? While It might be worthwhile reevaluating how gravity acts, the delay of information transmitted between two bodies is essential to maintain the Universe we observe to exist.
Quantised orbit jumps and entanglement do not suggest that information is transmitted instantaneously across a distance. They are simply outcomes of the mathmatical framework used to observe / measure systems. I feel you are deceiving your audience by suggesting the electric force acts instantaneously.
I would like to point out the EU likes to bash mathemagicians or the reliance of science on math for predictive theory, it is worth noting the same math is what allows an electrical engineer to make accurate predictions about the given behavior of a system, and go so far as to suggest the electric force acts instantaneously. -
Good morning spot on. good question can we measure the speed of magnetic connection? Just taking a guess it's way faster than the speed of light. The big bang theory is bullshit !thanks and be well
8m 16sLenght
629Rating