002 Dr. Robert Sungenis 'Geocentrism / Geocentric Cosmology' Aug 11/2013

About | Information | History | Online | Facts | Discovery

1. Understanding gravity will only happen when science wakes up to the fact that the earth is flat and no one can prove we live on a globe. If you are unclear on that try measure the curvature.
2. It's Flat Like the Belly of a Whale , That little bit of cooling rain brightened everything up. Words of Wisdom , Try the excrement it's delicious :) QC
3. hey, jimmy. how have you been?
4. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lef8k1JeIZ8&feature=em-upload_owner
5. "Sungenis possesses no degrees in any scientific discipline. He has a B.A. in religion from George Washington University (1979) and an M.A. in theology from Westminster Theological Seminary (1982). He also claims an unaccredited Ph.D. in religious studies from Calamus International University, which describes itself as  a “non-traditional” institution registered in the Republic of Vanuatu, a small island in the south Pacific. Others have characterized it as a diploma mill."   
     
   "His academic advisor, Morris Berg, claims a Ph.D. in hypnotherapy from what he describes as a “non-traditional university” and specializes in past life regressions and neo-shamanic healing. Calamus was recently offering doctorates for as low as $1600, but one can still get a “Ph.D.” there for about $2000."   
     
   Sungenis also calls the moon landing a hoax, the Holocaust a lie, the Titanic sinking a false flag, that Jesus rode his pet Biblesaurus to the Last Supper and Sungenis has plagiarized others' work on numerous documented occasions.  
     
   Details at geocentrismdebunked.org
6. http://www.wissenschaft.de/archiv/-/journal_content/56/12054/2022626/Die-Achse-des-B%C3%B6sen/
   Die Achse des Bösen
   Unser Universum auf dem Prüfstand: Es gibt seltsame Anomalien im Temperaturmuster vom Restleuchten des Urknalls. Sind sie nur Zufall oder bringen sie das kosmologische Standardmodell in Gefahr?
   Unser Universum auf dem Prüfstand: Es gibt seltsame Anomalien im Temperaturmuster vom Restleuchten des Urknalls. Sind sie nur Zufall oder bringen sie das kosmologische Standardmodell in Gefahr?
7. So the annual presentation of the Society of Numbskulls is giving its presentation here? Oh lovely. Come then Doctor Sungensis!! Bowl me over. I'm expecting to have my world view shattered....
   
   
   ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzz.....
   
   Oh sorry I dozed off....is he finished yet?? No??? He's still going on????
   
   Oh blimey
8. He reiterates the point that many heliocentric believers have publicly stated - it all depends on your point of reference.  The only way to know for exactly sure, is to get totally outside the system and look in.  The only being we know of who can get outside the universe is God, and he gave us the details of how he made the earth before the sun, moon, and stars.
9. If our modern understanding of physics can't determine with certainty whether the heliocentric or geocentric models are correct, what good is it? What does this tell us about other areas of study such as evolution? Perhaps we are being lied to on a much larger scale than we could imagine? Here's some food for thought...
   
   "To know what you know, and to know what you do not know. That is true knowledge."
   -Confucius
   
   Logic was invented in ancient Greece circa 300 B.C. as a systematic method by which free Greeks could identify deliberate deception and/or errors in reasoning. Niether the Greeks nor, later, the Romans considered it wise to teach logic to common slaves, for obvious reasons. The teaching of classical logic was removed from the US public school system over 150 years ago for exactly the same reasons (check out John Gatto's book"Dumbing Us Down"' his "Ultimate History Lesson" on youtube, and "The Lost Tools of Learning" by Dorothy Sayers, google). The following is the essence of that ancient system of reasoning.
   
   Cogent (logical) reasoning, reasoning designed to strongly appeal to the intellect rather than the emotions, should meet three conditions:
   
   1. It should begin with justified premises (true propositions supported by solid evidence).
   2. It should contain all of the relevant information (the suppression of relevant counterargument/evidence can be a very effective method of deception).
   3. It should come to a valid conclusion (a conclusion which necessarily follows from the premises, is free of contradiction, and consistent with the facts).
   
   When an argument meets these three conditions it is said to be both valid and sound (both properly constructed and, having true premises, very likely to be true). When an argument does not meet these conditions it is said to be fallacious (faulty/deceptive reasoning).
   
   Now for a bit of rhetoric with the informal logical fallacy.
   
   Professor Madsen Pirie most aptly defines a logical fallacy as anything one can say or do that breaks down or subverts reason. The ancient Greeks identified over 200 different logical fallacies. Here are a few examples (better defined in the book ' The Trivium: The Liberal Arts of Logic, Grammar, and Rhetoric' by Sister Miriam Joseph PhD):
   
   1. Argumentum ad hominem is the appeal to ridicule
   2. Argumentum ad misericordiam is the appeal to pity.
   3. Argumentum ad verecundiam is  the appeal to authority.
   4. Argumentum ad ignorantiam is the appeal to the ignorance of your audience.
   5. Argumentum ad baculum is the appeal to force/threats.
   6. Argumentum ad populum is the appeal to the passions/prejudices of the people.
   Etc.
   
   Therefore, when testing any argument one should ask if the three conditions of cogent reasoning have been met and if logical fallacies have been used.
   
   Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth
   9/11 Missing Links
   Dr. Alan Sabrosky, former Director of Studies at the US Army War College
   
   All on YouTube
10. He said he would explain why the Michelson Gale experiment showed the earth moving between 3 and 8 km/s but he never did.
11. The guy they brought on at the end to ask questions was a complete and total idiot with no knowledge.
12. good video, very poor sound quality
13. When you are a nit wit your just stupide
    Now with the preliminary's said how is it that Dr. of religious studies know anything about cosmology it is like having a flee farmer with the intricate understanding of brain surgery.
    It always surprises me when religious dick heads come up with something hundreds of years old that have been debunked.
    If this mental case was not so serious I would have thought tis was a comedy show.
14. sorry but convex "geostationyism" cannot work. you can't correctly plot the planets sun and moon. you can't work how stars that are supposedly light years away are making a complete orbit in 24 hours, you can't place a literal heaven anywhere. the only answer is concave earth. watch how i plotted the orbit of the moon for starters in my latest video.
15. #Geocentricism  - be careful how you play that.
16. I like how the Twins Paradox disproves the Theory of Relativity.  
17. "The earth is hung, the sun has an ecliptic." the book of Job
18. i hope its not another lame Sagnac effect proving ether exist trash. if you can violate Einstein's special relativity so what? earth is still revolving around the sun.
19. Shalom to you
    All you need to ask yourself is 'In which direction is there less universe?' Same in every direction obviously which equals earth in centre equally obvious to anyone capable of logic.
20. http://www.fixedearth.com/sixty-seven-references.html